On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service

Transporting parcels on urban passenger rail transit is gaining growing interest as a response to the increasing demand and cost of urban parcel delivery. To analyze the welfare effects of different fare regimes when allowing parcel services on an urban rail transit, this paper models the optimal se...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaoda Xie, Xifu Wang, Daisuke Fukuda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2758
id doaj-500d2a71e6a54b72b083945073a32eda
record_format Article
spelling doaj-500d2a71e6a54b72b083945073a32eda2020-11-25T03:10:55ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502020-04-01122758275810.3390/su12072758On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight ServiceChaoda Xie0Xifu Wang1Daisuke Fukuda2School of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, ChinaSchool of Traffic and Transportation, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, ChinaSchool of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8552, JapanTransporting parcels on urban passenger rail transit is gaining growing interest as a response to the increasing demand and cost of urban parcel delivery. To analyze the welfare effects of different fare regimes when allowing parcel services on an urban rail transit, this paper models the optimal service problem where the transit operator chooses the number of trains and the departure intervals. By introducing a reduced form train timetable problem, the passenger train crowding model is extended to incorporate the effect of freight train scheduling. We show that the freight users are better off in the time-varying optimal fare regime, while passengers are worse off, and that the time-varying optimal fare regime calls for more trains than the optimal uniform fare regime. However, the reduction in passenger trains due to the introduction of freight service can eliminate the welfare gain from passenger time-varying fare. If the price elasticity of freight demand is relatively high, implementing road toll can generate welfare loss when rail transit is privately operated.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2758rail transitfreightpricingtimetableoptimal service
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chaoda Xie
Xifu Wang
Daisuke Fukuda
spellingShingle Chaoda Xie
Xifu Wang
Daisuke Fukuda
On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
Sustainability
rail transit
freight
pricing
timetable
optimal service
author_facet Chaoda Xie
Xifu Wang
Daisuke Fukuda
author_sort Chaoda Xie
title On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
title_short On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
title_full On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
title_fullStr On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
title_full_unstemmed On the Pricing of Urban Rail Transit with Track Sharing Freight Service
title_sort on the pricing of urban rail transit with track sharing freight service
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Transporting parcels on urban passenger rail transit is gaining growing interest as a response to the increasing demand and cost of urban parcel delivery. To analyze the welfare effects of different fare regimes when allowing parcel services on an urban rail transit, this paper models the optimal service problem where the transit operator chooses the number of trains and the departure intervals. By introducing a reduced form train timetable problem, the passenger train crowding model is extended to incorporate the effect of freight train scheduling. We show that the freight users are better off in the time-varying optimal fare regime, while passengers are worse off, and that the time-varying optimal fare regime calls for more trains than the optimal uniform fare regime. However, the reduction in passenger trains due to the introduction of freight service can eliminate the welfare gain from passenger time-varying fare. If the price elasticity of freight demand is relatively high, implementing road toll can generate welfare loss when rail transit is privately operated.
topic rail transit
freight
pricing
timetable
optimal service
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/7/2758
work_keys_str_mv AT chaodaxie onthepricingofurbanrailtransitwithtracksharingfreightservice
AT xifuwang onthepricingofurbanrailtransitwithtracksharingfreightservice
AT daisukefukuda onthepricingofurbanrailtransitwithtracksharingfreightservice
_version_ 1724656422672662528