Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories
This paper argues that a monolithic land-use planning “grand narrative” is not sufficiently flexible, but that the fragmentation into innumerable “small narratives” goes against any sense of the existence of an established domain of knowledge. Its aim is to ex...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Urban Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/2/3/93 |
id |
doaj-503158873f3149c79685244a6f419cf3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-503158873f3149c79685244a6f419cf32020-11-25T00:54:33ZengMDPI AGUrban Science2413-88512018-09-01239310.3390/urbansci2030093urbansci2030093Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning TheoriesAlexandros Ph. Lagopoulos0Department of Urban and Regional Planning and Development, School of Architecture, Faculty of Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, GreeceThis paper argues that a monolithic land-use planning “grand narrative” is not sufficiently flexible, but that the fragmentation into innumerable “small narratives” goes against any sense of the existence of an established domain of knowledge. Its aim is to explore the epistemological possibility for “middle ground” theories. The methodology adopted for this purpose is to take as a standard reference the methodological components of comprehensive/procedural planning and to measure against them the methodologies proposed by a corpus of other major land-use planning approaches. The outcome of this comparison is that for more than half a century, planning theories in the field of urban and regional planning have been revolving incessantly around the methodological components of the comprehensive model, which seem, at least at the present stage of our knowledge, to be the universal nucleus of the land-use planning enterprise. This paper indicates on this basis the prerequisites for the construction of middle-ground land-use planning theories and how we can pass from the formal contextual variants to real life contexts through the original articulation of planning theory with input from the findings of the actual planning systems.http://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/2/3/93land-use planning theoryland-use planning methodologymiddle-ground theoryurban and regional planning systemspositivismpostmodern/semiotic approaches to planning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos |
spellingShingle |
Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories Urban Science land-use planning theory land-use planning methodology middle-ground theory urban and regional planning systems positivism postmodern/semiotic approaches to planning |
author_facet |
Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos |
author_sort |
Alexandros Ph. Lagopoulos |
title |
Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories |
title_short |
Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories |
title_full |
Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories |
title_fullStr |
Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories |
title_full_unstemmed |
Land-Use Planning Methodology and Middle-Ground Planning Theories |
title_sort |
land-use planning methodology and middle-ground planning theories |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Urban Science |
issn |
2413-8851 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
This paper argues that a monolithic land-use planning “grand narrative” is not sufficiently flexible, but that the fragmentation into innumerable “small narratives” goes against any sense of the existence of an established domain of knowledge. Its aim is to explore the epistemological possibility for “middle ground” theories. The methodology adopted for this purpose is to take as a standard reference the methodological components of comprehensive/procedural planning and to measure against them the methodologies proposed by a corpus of other major land-use planning approaches. The outcome of this comparison is that for more than half a century, planning theories in the field of urban and regional planning have been revolving incessantly around the methodological components of the comprehensive model, which seem, at least at the present stage of our knowledge, to be the universal nucleus of the land-use planning enterprise. This paper indicates on this basis the prerequisites for the construction of middle-ground land-use planning theories and how we can pass from the formal contextual variants to real life contexts through the original articulation of planning theory with input from the findings of the actual planning systems. |
topic |
land-use planning theory land-use planning methodology middle-ground theory urban and regional planning systems positivism postmodern/semiotic approaches to planning |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2413-8851/2/3/93 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alexandrosphlagopoulos landuseplanningmethodologyandmiddlegroundplanningtheories |
_version_ |
1725233724967092224 |