A new burst evaluation index of coal–rock combination specimen considering rebound and damage effects of rock

• Main Authors: Dong-Xiao Zhang, Wei-Yao Guo, Chuan-Wei Zang, Xu-Fei Gong, Zhan-Hai Li, Yue Qiu, Wen-guo Chen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
• Series: Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
• Subjects: rock burst; coal–rock combination; bursting liability; index; energy
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1760945
• ISSN: 1947-5705; 1947-5713

Obtaining the bursting liability is essential for rock burst mitigation. To reasonably evaluate the bursting liability of coal in deep coal mining, a new modified bursting energy index considering rebound and damage effects of rock is proposed. Then, uniaxial compressive tests of gypsum–rock combination specimens with different rock types are conducted for researching the energy evolution and bursting liability. Third, the traditional bursting energy index KE and modified bursting energy index KED are compared. At last, the reasonability of KED is verified through PFC2D simulation. Results show: (1) When evaluating the bursting liability of coal–rock combination, the rebound and damage effects of rock must be considered. (2) The uniaxial compressive strength of gypsum–rock combination specimen nonlinearly increases with increasing rock strength, but the dynamic failure duration exponentially decreases. (3) KE and KED all increase linearly when the rock strength increases. (4) The slope of fitting curve of KED is smaller than that of KE, indicating that the bursting liability calculated by KE is strengthened. (5) PFC2D simulation shows that KED decreases with increasing number of drilling hole in the coal component. When using KED to evaluate the bursting liability of coal–rock combination, it is more reasonable and applicable.