A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.

We present a dynamical systems analysis of a decision-making mechanism inspired by collective choice in house-hunting honeybee swarms, revealing the crucial role of cross-inhibitory 'stop-signalling' in improving the decision-making capabilities. We show that strength of cross-inhibition i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Darren Pais, Patrick M Hogan, Thomas Schlegel, Nigel R Franks, Naomi E Leonard, James A R Marshall
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3759446?pdf=render
id doaj-504d8cfb479240aa845d06ed14a18cc4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-504d8cfb479240aa845d06ed14a18cc42020-11-24T21:49:12ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7321610.1371/journal.pone.0073216A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.Darren PaisPatrick M HoganThomas SchlegelNigel R FranksNaomi E LeonardJames A R MarshallWe present a dynamical systems analysis of a decision-making mechanism inspired by collective choice in house-hunting honeybee swarms, revealing the crucial role of cross-inhibitory 'stop-signalling' in improving the decision-making capabilities. We show that strength of cross-inhibition is a decision-parameter influencing how decisions depend both on the difference in value and on the mean value of the alternatives; this is in contrast to many previous mechanistic models of decision-making, which are typically sensitive to decision accuracy rather than the value of the option chosen. The strength of cross-inhibition determines when deadlock over similarly valued alternatives is maintained or broken, as a function of the mean value; thus, changes in cross-inhibition strength allow adaptive time-dependent decision-making strategies. Cross-inhibition also tunes the minimum difference between alternatives required for reliable discrimination, in a manner similar to Weber's law of just-noticeable difference. Finally, cross-inhibition tunes the speed-accuracy trade-off realised when differences in the values of the alternatives are sufficiently large to matter. We propose that the model, and the significant role of the values of the alternatives, may describe other decision-making systems, including intracellular regulatory circuits, and simple neural circuits, and may provide guidance in the design of decision-making algorithms for artificial systems, particularly those functioning without centralised control.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3759446?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Darren Pais
Patrick M Hogan
Thomas Schlegel
Nigel R Franks
Naomi E Leonard
James A R Marshall
spellingShingle Darren Pais
Patrick M Hogan
Thomas Schlegel
Nigel R Franks
Naomi E Leonard
James A R Marshall
A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Darren Pais
Patrick M Hogan
Thomas Schlegel
Nigel R Franks
Naomi E Leonard
James A R Marshall
author_sort Darren Pais
title A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
title_short A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
title_full A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
title_fullStr A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
title_full_unstemmed A mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
title_sort mechanism for value-sensitive decision-making.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description We present a dynamical systems analysis of a decision-making mechanism inspired by collective choice in house-hunting honeybee swarms, revealing the crucial role of cross-inhibitory 'stop-signalling' in improving the decision-making capabilities. We show that strength of cross-inhibition is a decision-parameter influencing how decisions depend both on the difference in value and on the mean value of the alternatives; this is in contrast to many previous mechanistic models of decision-making, which are typically sensitive to decision accuracy rather than the value of the option chosen. The strength of cross-inhibition determines when deadlock over similarly valued alternatives is maintained or broken, as a function of the mean value; thus, changes in cross-inhibition strength allow adaptive time-dependent decision-making strategies. Cross-inhibition also tunes the minimum difference between alternatives required for reliable discrimination, in a manner similar to Weber's law of just-noticeable difference. Finally, cross-inhibition tunes the speed-accuracy trade-off realised when differences in the values of the alternatives are sufficiently large to matter. We propose that the model, and the significant role of the values of the alternatives, may describe other decision-making systems, including intracellular regulatory circuits, and simple neural circuits, and may provide guidance in the design of decision-making algorithms for artificial systems, particularly those functioning without centralised control.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3759446?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT darrenpais amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT patrickmhogan amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT thomasschlegel amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT nigelrfranks amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT naomieleonard amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT jamesarmarshall amechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT darrenpais mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT patrickmhogan mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT thomasschlegel mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT nigelrfranks mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT naomieleonard mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
AT jamesarmarshall mechanismforvaluesensitivedecisionmaking
_version_ 1725888829098819584