VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD

The WIMS/PANTHER Embedded Supercell Method (ESM) provides a significant improvement in prediction accuracy for radial power distributions for PWR reactors compared to the standard “two-step” approach, without the need for a significant increase in computational resource. Recent papers at PHYSOR confer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bryce Paul, Hosking Glynn, Knight Martin, Lindley Ben, Powney David, Schneidesch Christophe, Slosse Nicolas, Taylor Tom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2021-01-01
Series:EPJ Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2021/01/epjconf_physor2020_02016.pdf
id doaj-506295ce623144dc9db91ed707f38566
record_format Article
spelling doaj-506295ce623144dc9db91ed707f385662021-08-02T17:50:15ZengEDP SciencesEPJ Web of Conferences2100-014X2021-01-012470201610.1051/epjconf/202124702016epjconf_physor2020_02016VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHODBryce Paul0Hosking Glynn1Knight Martin2Lindley Ben3Powney David4Schneidesch Christophe5Slosse Nicolas6Taylor Tom7EDF Energy Barnett WayWood Nuclear Queen Mother SquareEDF Energy Barnett WayWood Nuclear Queen Mother SquareWood Nuclear Queen Mother SquareTractebel Engineering S.A. Boulevard Simon Bolivar 34Tractebel Engineering S.A. Boulevard Simon Bolivar 34EDF Energy Barnett WayThe WIMS/PANTHER Embedded Supercell Method (ESM) provides a significant improvement in prediction accuracy for radial power distributions for PWR reactors compared to the standard “two-step” approach, without the need for a significant increase in computational resource. Recent papers at PHYSOR conferences have outlined the details of the method and demonstrated its operation, and the accuracy improvements possible, by means of benchmarking calculations. This paper applies the method to a 4-loop PWR in the U.K, and three PWRs (3-loop and 2-loop) in Belgium. Comparisons are made against measured data from the start-of-cycle physics testing performed for each cycle, and power-shape measurements collected during the cycle using a conventional “two-step” nodal reactor solution, and with the ESM. All results will be presented with the JEF2.2 nuclear data library, for ease of comparison between the methods and previously reported results, although the effects of more modern evaluations will be commented upon. The benchmark calculations referred to above studied a challenging MOX/UO2 benchmark core akin to an SMR. The four reactors studied here include conventional UO2 only core designs and cycles with UO2/MOX mixed cores. A variety of boron-and gadolinium-based burnable absorbers are also present. The data is used to show that the method both operates successfully for real reactor problems, and delivers improvements in the prediction accuracy of measured parameters.https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2021/01/epjconf_physor2020_02016.pdfwimspanthercorevalidationembedded
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bryce Paul
Hosking Glynn
Knight Martin
Lindley Ben
Powney David
Schneidesch Christophe
Slosse Nicolas
Taylor Tom
spellingShingle Bryce Paul
Hosking Glynn
Knight Martin
Lindley Ben
Powney David
Schneidesch Christophe
Slosse Nicolas
Taylor Tom
VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
EPJ Web of Conferences
wims
panther
core
validation
embedded
author_facet Bryce Paul
Hosking Glynn
Knight Martin
Lindley Ben
Powney David
Schneidesch Christophe
Slosse Nicolas
Taylor Tom
author_sort Bryce Paul
title VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
title_short VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
title_full VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
title_fullStr VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
title_full_unstemmed VALIDATION OF THE WIMS/PANTHER EMBEDDED SUPERCELL METHOD
title_sort validation of the wims/panther embedded supercell method
publisher EDP Sciences
series EPJ Web of Conferences
issn 2100-014X
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The WIMS/PANTHER Embedded Supercell Method (ESM) provides a significant improvement in prediction accuracy for radial power distributions for PWR reactors compared to the standard “two-step” approach, without the need for a significant increase in computational resource. Recent papers at PHYSOR conferences have outlined the details of the method and demonstrated its operation, and the accuracy improvements possible, by means of benchmarking calculations. This paper applies the method to a 4-loop PWR in the U.K, and three PWRs (3-loop and 2-loop) in Belgium. Comparisons are made against measured data from the start-of-cycle physics testing performed for each cycle, and power-shape measurements collected during the cycle using a conventional “two-step” nodal reactor solution, and with the ESM. All results will be presented with the JEF2.2 nuclear data library, for ease of comparison between the methods and previously reported results, although the effects of more modern evaluations will be commented upon. The benchmark calculations referred to above studied a challenging MOX/UO2 benchmark core akin to an SMR. The four reactors studied here include conventional UO2 only core designs and cycles with UO2/MOX mixed cores. A variety of boron-and gadolinium-based burnable absorbers are also present. The data is used to show that the method both operates successfully for real reactor problems, and delivers improvements in the prediction accuracy of measured parameters.
topic wims
panther
core
validation
embedded
url https://www.epj-conferences.org/articles/epjconf/pdf/2021/01/epjconf_physor2020_02016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT brycepaul validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT hoskingglynn validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT knightmartin validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT lindleyben validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT powneydavid validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT schneideschchristophe validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT slossenicolas validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
AT taylortom validationofthewimspantherembeddedsupercellmethod
_version_ 1721228768496844800