The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals

Abstract Background Despite intentions to increase user participation in the development of health services, the concept of participation and how it unfolds within studies with a participatory design has rarely been addressed. Objective The aim of this study was to describe how user participation ma...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sebastian Lindblom, Maria Flink, Marie Elf, Ann Charlotte Laska, Lena von Koch, Charlotte Ytterberg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-06-01
Series:Health Expectations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13233
id doaj-506bbe6b10cd4b298b967534e18044f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-506bbe6b10cd4b298b967534e18044f62021-06-26T18:56:09ZengWileyHealth Expectations1369-65131369-76252021-06-0124390591610.1111/hex.13233The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionalsSebastian Lindblom0Maria Flink1Marie Elf2Ann Charlotte Laska3Lena von Koch4Charlotte Ytterberg5Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Huddinge SwedenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Huddinge SwedenSchool of Education, Health and Social Studies Dalarna University Falun SwedenDepartment of Clinical Sciences Danderyd Hospital Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Huddinge SwedenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society Karolinska Institutet Huddinge SwedenAbstract Background Despite intentions to increase user participation in the development of health services, the concept of participation and how it unfolds within studies with a participatory design has rarely been addressed. Objective The aim of this study was to describe how user participation manifests itself within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals, including potential enablers or barriers. Methods This study was conducted in the context of a co‐design process of a new person‐centred transition from a hospital to continued rehabilitation in the home involving three patients with stroke, one significant other and 11 professionals. Data were collected by observations during the workshops, semi‐structured interviews and questionnaires. Results Four categories: ‘Composition of individuals for an adaptive climate’; ‘The balancing of roles and power’; ‘Different perspectives as common ground for a shared understanding’; and ‘Facilitating an unpredictable and ever‐adaptive process’, with all together nine subcategories, resulted from the analysis. Participation varied between individuals, groups and steps within the process, and on the topic of discussions and the motivation to contribute. Discussion/Conclusion Participation is not something that is realized by only applying participatory design methodology. Participation manifests itself through the interaction of the participants and their skills to handle different perspectives, roles and assignments. Participation is enabled by individual, group and facilitating aspects. Co‐design processes should allow for varying levels of participation among the participants and throughout the process. Patient or public contribution Patients, significant others and health‐care professionals participated as co‐designers of a care transition model between hospital and home.https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13233design thinkinghealth services researchinvolvementparticipatory designpatient participationqualitative research
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sebastian Lindblom
Maria Flink
Marie Elf
Ann Charlotte Laska
Lena von Koch
Charlotte Ytterberg
spellingShingle Sebastian Lindblom
Maria Flink
Marie Elf
Ann Charlotte Laska
Lena von Koch
Charlotte Ytterberg
The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
Health Expectations
design thinking
health services research
involvement
participatory design
patient participation
qualitative research
author_facet Sebastian Lindblom
Maria Flink
Marie Elf
Ann Charlotte Laska
Lena von Koch
Charlotte Ytterberg
author_sort Sebastian Lindblom
title The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
title_short The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
title_full The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
title_fullStr The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
title_full_unstemmed The manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
title_sort manifestation of participation within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals
publisher Wiley
series Health Expectations
issn 1369-6513
1369-7625
publishDate 2021-06-01
description Abstract Background Despite intentions to increase user participation in the development of health services, the concept of participation and how it unfolds within studies with a participatory design has rarely been addressed. Objective The aim of this study was to describe how user participation manifests itself within a co‐design process involving patients, significant others and health‐care professionals, including potential enablers or barriers. Methods This study was conducted in the context of a co‐design process of a new person‐centred transition from a hospital to continued rehabilitation in the home involving three patients with stroke, one significant other and 11 professionals. Data were collected by observations during the workshops, semi‐structured interviews and questionnaires. Results Four categories: ‘Composition of individuals for an adaptive climate’; ‘The balancing of roles and power’; ‘Different perspectives as common ground for a shared understanding’; and ‘Facilitating an unpredictable and ever‐adaptive process’, with all together nine subcategories, resulted from the analysis. Participation varied between individuals, groups and steps within the process, and on the topic of discussions and the motivation to contribute. Discussion/Conclusion Participation is not something that is realized by only applying participatory design methodology. Participation manifests itself through the interaction of the participants and their skills to handle different perspectives, roles and assignments. Participation is enabled by individual, group and facilitating aspects. Co‐design processes should allow for varying levels of participation among the participants and throughout the process. Patient or public contribution Patients, significant others and health‐care professionals participated as co‐designers of a care transition model between hospital and home.
topic design thinking
health services research
involvement
participatory design
patient participation
qualitative research
url https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13233
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastianlindblom themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT mariaflink themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT marieelf themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT anncharlottelaska themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT lenavonkoch themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT charlotteytterberg themanifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT sebastianlindblom manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT mariaflink manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT marieelf manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT anncharlottelaska manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT lenavonkoch manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
AT charlotteytterberg manifestationofparticipationwithinacodesignprocessinvolvingpatientssignificantothersandhealthcareprofessionals
_version_ 1721358741877555200