Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija

QUANTITATIVE LITERARY STUDIES AND INTERPRETATION The analysis of the author’s own past research has shown that digital tools do not have a significant role in contributing to new interpretations of the Slovene literary canon. However, when shifting the subject of interpretation from a single work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hladnik, Miran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Philological Society 2021-04-01
Series:Umjetnost Riječi
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hrcak.srce.hr/256324
id doaj-5088e5fa7e6849989f15fa9b7034edf7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5088e5fa7e6849989f15fa9b7034edf72021-07-02T15:07:32ZengCroatian Philological SocietyUmjetnost Riječi0503-15831849-16932021-04-01643-4285300https://doi.org/10.22210/ur.2020.064.3_4/05Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacijaHladnik, Miran0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-376XFilozofski fakultet Sveučilišta u LjubljaniQUANTITATIVE LITERARY STUDIES AND INTERPRETATION The analysis of the author’s own past research has shown that digital tools do not have a significant role in contributing to new interpretations of the Slovene literary canon. However, when shifting the subject of interpretation from a single work to authorial opera, genre corpora, literary period or the entire national literature, it becomes clear how quantitative methods, stimulated by digitalisation of the cul-tural past, literary databases and digital tools play a vital role. Interpretations that consider the richness of data, generated by digital culture, are more trustworthy than the former ones.The price we pay for that is the refusal of clear encyclopaedic definitions and de-scriptions. Literary past, observed through the digital humanities’ perspective has a fuzzy development because the central phaenomena gradually fade in the multitude of rival or peripheral phenomena. Slovene literature is not represented by prominent authors and their famous works any more, it does not comply with dictation of the great national myth, i.e., the construction of the nation from the spirit of literature. Rather, it is considered as a random fact, a matter of serendipity. It is represented as the entire literary production on the Slovene territory, in Slovene as well as other languages. Due to special circumstances, it is different from the neighbouring literatures and it triggers new, nation-specific definitions of literary phenomena.New interpretations of Slovene literature are not only indebted to the use of digital tools, but also to the consequence of changes within the literary system itself. In its beginnings, Slovene literature was dedicated to the constitution and emancipation of the nation, while now it also legitimately fulfils other human needs and functions: cultural recreation, women and social minorities’ emancipation and mobilisation, escapism, self-reflection, self-therapy, testing of the alternative models of social behaviour, etc.https://hrcak.srce.hr/256324slovene literary historydigital humanitiesquantitative methodsinterpretation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hladnik, Miran
spellingShingle Hladnik, Miran
Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
Umjetnost Riječi
slovene literary history
digital humanities
quantitative methods
interpretation
author_facet Hladnik, Miran
author_sort Hladnik, Miran
title Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
title_short Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
title_full Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
title_fullStr Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
title_full_unstemmed Kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
title_sort kvantitativna znanost o književnosti i interpretacija
publisher Croatian Philological Society
series Umjetnost Riječi
issn 0503-1583
1849-1693
publishDate 2021-04-01
description QUANTITATIVE LITERARY STUDIES AND INTERPRETATION The analysis of the author’s own past research has shown that digital tools do not have a significant role in contributing to new interpretations of the Slovene literary canon. However, when shifting the subject of interpretation from a single work to authorial opera, genre corpora, literary period or the entire national literature, it becomes clear how quantitative methods, stimulated by digitalisation of the cul-tural past, literary databases and digital tools play a vital role. Interpretations that consider the richness of data, generated by digital culture, are more trustworthy than the former ones.The price we pay for that is the refusal of clear encyclopaedic definitions and de-scriptions. Literary past, observed through the digital humanities’ perspective has a fuzzy development because the central phaenomena gradually fade in the multitude of rival or peripheral phenomena. Slovene literature is not represented by prominent authors and their famous works any more, it does not comply with dictation of the great national myth, i.e., the construction of the nation from the spirit of literature. Rather, it is considered as a random fact, a matter of serendipity. It is represented as the entire literary production on the Slovene territory, in Slovene as well as other languages. Due to special circumstances, it is different from the neighbouring literatures and it triggers new, nation-specific definitions of literary phenomena.New interpretations of Slovene literature are not only indebted to the use of digital tools, but also to the consequence of changes within the literary system itself. In its beginnings, Slovene literature was dedicated to the constitution and emancipation of the nation, while now it also legitimately fulfils other human needs and functions: cultural recreation, women and social minorities’ emancipation and mobilisation, escapism, self-reflection, self-therapy, testing of the alternative models of social behaviour, etc.
topic slovene literary history
digital humanities
quantitative methods
interpretation
url https://hrcak.srce.hr/256324
work_keys_str_mv AT hladnikmiran kvantitativnaznanostoknjizevnostiiinterpretacija
_version_ 1721327450942603264