Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has adopted assessment systems and drug registration procedures to respond to the needs for rapid patient access to therapies, such as Conditional Marketing Approval (CMA) and Under Exceptional Circumstances approval (UEC). The Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Federico Villa, Claudio Jommi, Armando Genazzani, Sara Antignani, Simona Montilla, Mario Melazzini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AboutScience Srl 2018-08-01
Series:Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2284240318792447
id doaj-50aa302b9b3740eb97e248fe576f99f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50aa302b9b3740eb97e248fe576f99f42020-11-25T01:18:43ZengAboutScience SrlGlobal & Regional Health Technology Assessment2283-57332018-08-01201810.1177/2284240318792447Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFAFederico Villa0Claudio Jommi1Armando Genazzani2Sara Antignani3Simona Montilla4Mario Melazzini5Universiti degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, ItalyUniversiti degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, ItalyUniversiti degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”, ItalyAgenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Roma, ItalyAgenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Roma, ItalyAgenzia Italiana del Farmaco, Roma, ItalyThe European Medicines Agency (EMA) has adopted assessment systems and drug registration procedures to respond to the needs for rapid patient access to therapies, such as Conditional Marketing Approval (CMA) and Under Exceptional Circumstances approval (UEC). The Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has introduced tools for governing prescriptive behaviour in order to promote appropriateness and correct use of drugs and to manage the uncertainty of financial impact, including Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs). The MEAs are conditional access agreements to the market for new drugs aimed at managing the uncertainty on the clinical and economic effects of the drugs themselves. The aim of this study is to analyse, through the use of the information systems of the AIFA and the institutional website of the EMA, how the drugs authorised by EMA with CMA or UEC have been managed on the access side to the Italian NHS. This in order to understand how the uncertainty deriving from the authorisation processes was subsequently reflected on the reimbursement processes to be borne by the NHS. From the analyses carried out, it emerges that 64% of the drugs approved with CMA were admitted to reimbursement and 68% of those approved with the UEC procedure. Furthermore, it can be noted that approval with CMA is predictive for the application of a financial-based or outcome-based MEA (61%), with the application of a monitoring register, unlike the drugs approved UEC for which no conditional reimbursement arrangements have been applied at the patient level. Furthermore, by carrying out a comparative analysis of the time of access to market following negotiation, from the positive opinion of the CHMP to the decision published in the Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, it emerged that the drugs approved by the UEC procedure take on average more time (897 days) to arrive at the price and reimbursement (P&R) compared to CMA drugs (636 days). Considering instead only the period from the request for P&R to the determination of P&R for the same group of drugs, the process seems to be on average faster for the drugs classified as UEC than for those with CMA (329 vs. 510 days).https://doi.org/10.1177/2284240318792447
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Federico Villa
Claudio Jommi
Armando Genazzani
Sara Antignani
Simona Montilla
Mario Melazzini
spellingShingle Federico Villa
Claudio Jommi
Armando Genazzani
Sara Antignani
Simona Montilla
Mario Melazzini
Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
author_facet Federico Villa
Claudio Jommi
Armando Genazzani
Sara Antignani
Simona Montilla
Mario Melazzini
author_sort Federico Villa
title Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
title_short Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
title_full Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
title_fullStr Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
title_full_unstemmed Accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di EMA agli accordi negoziali particolari di AIFA
title_sort accesso precoce al mercato: dalle approvazioni condizionate di ema agli accordi negoziali particolari di aifa
publisher AboutScience Srl
series Global & Regional Health Technology Assessment
issn 2283-5733
publishDate 2018-08-01
description The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has adopted assessment systems and drug registration procedures to respond to the needs for rapid patient access to therapies, such as Conditional Marketing Approval (CMA) and Under Exceptional Circumstances approval (UEC). The Italian Medicine Agency (AIFA) has introduced tools for governing prescriptive behaviour in order to promote appropriateness and correct use of drugs and to manage the uncertainty of financial impact, including Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs). The MEAs are conditional access agreements to the market for new drugs aimed at managing the uncertainty on the clinical and economic effects of the drugs themselves. The aim of this study is to analyse, through the use of the information systems of the AIFA and the institutional website of the EMA, how the drugs authorised by EMA with CMA or UEC have been managed on the access side to the Italian NHS. This in order to understand how the uncertainty deriving from the authorisation processes was subsequently reflected on the reimbursement processes to be borne by the NHS. From the analyses carried out, it emerges that 64% of the drugs approved with CMA were admitted to reimbursement and 68% of those approved with the UEC procedure. Furthermore, it can be noted that approval with CMA is predictive for the application of a financial-based or outcome-based MEA (61%), with the application of a monitoring register, unlike the drugs approved UEC for which no conditional reimbursement arrangements have been applied at the patient level. Furthermore, by carrying out a comparative analysis of the time of access to market following negotiation, from the positive opinion of the CHMP to the decision published in the Official Gazette of the Italian Republic, it emerged that the drugs approved by the UEC procedure take on average more time (897 days) to arrive at the price and reimbursement (P&R) compared to CMA drugs (636 days). Considering instead only the period from the request for P&R to the determination of P&R for the same group of drugs, the process seems to be on average faster for the drugs classified as UEC than for those with CMA (329 vs. 510 days).
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2284240318792447
work_keys_str_mv AT federicovilla accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
AT claudiojommi accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
AT armandogenazzani accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
AT saraantignani accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
AT simonamontilla accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
AT mariomelazzini accessoprecocealmercatodalleapprovazionicondizionatediemaagliaccordinegozialiparticolaridiaifa
_version_ 1725140892634841088