Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction

Background Different types of growth and yield models provide essential information for making informed decisions on how to manage forests. Whole-stand models often provide well-behaved outputs at the stand level, but lack information on stand structures. Detailed information from individual-tree m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quang V Cao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2014-10-01
Series:Forest Ecosystems
Online Access:http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/18
id doaj-50b30b7663134c569bf78528702447de
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50b30b7663134c569bf78528702447de2020-11-25T01:14:04ZengSpringerOpenForest Ecosystems2095-63552197-56202014-10-01110.1186/s40663-014-0018-zLinking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield predictionQuang V Cao0School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803, LA, USA Background Different types of growth and yield models provide essential information for making informed decisions on how to manage forests. Whole-stand models often provide well-behaved outputs at the stand level, but lack information on stand structures. Detailed information from individual-tree models and size-class models typically suffers from accumulation of errors. The disaggregation method, in assuming that predictions from a whole-stand model are reliable, partitions these outputs to individual trees. On the other hand, the combination method seeks to improve stand-level predictions from both whole-stand and individual-tree models by combining them. Methods Data from 100 plots randomly selected from the Southwide Seed Source Study of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were used to evaluate the unadjusted individual-tree model against the disaggregation and combination methods. Results Compared to the whole-stand model, the combination method did not show improvements in predicting stand attributes in this study. The combination method also did not perform as well as the disaggregation method in tree-level predictions. The disaggregation method provided the best predictions of tree- and stand-level survival and growth. Conclusions The disaggregation approach provides a link between individual-tree models and whole-stand models, and should be considered as a better alternative to the unadjusted tree model.http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/18
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Quang V Cao
spellingShingle Quang V Cao
Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
Forest Ecosystems
author_facet Quang V Cao
author_sort Quang V Cao
title Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
title_short Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
title_full Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
title_fullStr Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
title_full_unstemmed Linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
title_sort linking individual-tree and whole-stand models for forest growth and yield prediction
publisher SpringerOpen
series Forest Ecosystems
issn 2095-6355
2197-5620
publishDate 2014-10-01
description Background Different types of growth and yield models provide essential information for making informed decisions on how to manage forests. Whole-stand models often provide well-behaved outputs at the stand level, but lack information on stand structures. Detailed information from individual-tree models and size-class models typically suffers from accumulation of errors. The disaggregation method, in assuming that predictions from a whole-stand model are reliable, partitions these outputs to individual trees. On the other hand, the combination method seeks to improve stand-level predictions from both whole-stand and individual-tree models by combining them. Methods Data from 100 plots randomly selected from the Southwide Seed Source Study of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) were used to evaluate the unadjusted individual-tree model against the disaggregation and combination methods. Results Compared to the whole-stand model, the combination method did not show improvements in predicting stand attributes in this study. The combination method also did not perform as well as the disaggregation method in tree-level predictions. The disaggregation method provided the best predictions of tree- and stand-level survival and growth. Conclusions The disaggregation approach provides a link between individual-tree models and whole-stand models, and should be considered as a better alternative to the unadjusted tree model.
url http://www.forestecosyst.com/content/1/1/18
work_keys_str_mv AT quangvcao linkingindividualtreeandwholestandmodelsforforestgrowthandyieldprediction
_version_ 1725159087955509248