Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, <it>Chlamydia </it>screening implementation programme in the Netherlands

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementing <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>screening in the Netherlands has been a point of debate for several years. The National Health Council advised against implementing nationwide screening until additional data co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Koekenbier Rik H, Hoebe Christian JPA, de Feijter Eva M, Brouwers Elfi EHG, van den Broek Ingrid VF, Fennema Johannes SA, van Bergen Jan EAM, Op de Coul Eline LM, van Ravesteijn Sander M, Götz Hannelore M
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-10-01
Series:BMC Infectious Diseases
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/293
Description
Summary:<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Implementing <it>Chlamydia trachomatis </it>screening in the Netherlands has been a point of debate for several years. The National Health Council advised against implementing nationwide screening until additional data collected from a pilot project in 2003 suggested that screening by risk profiles could be effective. A continuous increase in infections recorded in the national surveillance database affirmed the need for a more active approach. Here, we describe the rationale, design, and implementation of a <it>Chlamydia </it>screening demonstration programme.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A systematic, selective, internet-based <it>Chlamydia </it>screening programme started in April 2008. Letters are sent annually to all 16 to 29-year-old residents of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, and selected municipalities of South Limburg. The letters invite sexually active persons to login to <url>http://www.chlamydiatest.nl</url> with a personal code and to request a test kit. In the lower prevalence area of South Limburg, test kits can only be requested if the internet-based risk assessment exceeds a predefined value.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>We sent invitations to 261,025 people in the first round. One-fifth of the invitees requested a test kit, of whom 80% sent in a sample for testing. The overall positivity rate was 4.2%.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>This programme advances <it>Chlamydia </it>control activities in the Netherlands. Insight into the feasibility, effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and impact of this large-scale screening programme will determine whether the programme will be implemented nationally.</p>
ISSN:1471-2334