Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness

The elusive nature and the function of art occupy a highly contested territory within aesthetic philosophy since its inception. The present article also engages with the question of the nature and the function of art, though in a more narrowed and specific domain. The claim that is going to be tackl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abolfazl Mohammadi
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian University 2019-09-01
Series:The Polish Journal of Aesthetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/documents/138618288/143854005/PJA-54-mohammadi.pdf/6186efdf-2b32-4ead-8925-6abe3e86660e
id doaj-50cf932fd80748e190b2f84a9037ae49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50cf932fd80748e190b2f84a9037ae492021-01-07T19:33:45ZdeuInstitute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian UniversityThe Polish Journal of Aesthetics2544-82422544-82422019-09-01543/2019476410.19205/54.19.3Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of ConsciousnessAbolfazl Mohammadi0University of TeheranThe elusive nature and the function of art occupy a highly contested territory within aesthetic philosophy since its inception. The present article also engages with the question of the nature and the function of art, though in a more narrowed and specific domain. The claim that is going to be tackled here is whether improvisation in art, in general, makes a statement against empirical science? To corroborate this claim I will look at specific artworks that offer a way of considering the function of art as something that can stand in opposition to empirical science and as something that therefore can offer an alternative understanding of consciousness. The main question is, “where does improvisation stand against the radical evolutionary positivist objectivization of consciousness?” To answer, we look at the emancipatory role of art that challenges the empiricism of modern science via investigating several artworks as signposts. We examine different types of improvisation by analyzing Joe Wight’s Darkest Hour (2017) and by drawing on the concept of autopoiesis, we define autopoietic improvisation as free improvisation. Then we draw on Charlie Brooker’s Black Mirror show (2011–present) to indicate that the idea of how indelible techno-totalitarianism, which envisages a dystopian future for mankind via the refinement and regulation of consciousness, offers a limited view of consciousness. Techno-totalitarianism stands as a key term to be defined and analyzed here as it is precisely the mechanism against and through which I will shape a new discourse of improvisation. Techno-totalitarianism is the state of digital rationalization and instrumentation of neuroscience in the regulation of human desire, choice, and behavior such as regulation and self-regulation are no longer distinguishable. We also discuss how finding a theory of everything and complete formula for consciousness means cutting new alleyways to utter annihilation of human will, improvisation or freedom in general.https://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/documents/138618288/143854005/PJA-54-mohammadi.pdf/6186efdf-2b32-4ead-8925-6abe3e86660eanti-representational artneuroscienceimprovisationself-objectivizationtechnototalitarianismautopoiesisconsciousness
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abolfazl Mohammadi
spellingShingle Abolfazl Mohammadi
Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
The Polish Journal of Aesthetics
anti-representational art
neuroscience
improvisation
self-objectivization
technototalitarianism
autopoiesis
consciousness
author_facet Abolfazl Mohammadi
author_sort Abolfazl Mohammadi
title Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
title_short Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
title_full Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
title_fullStr Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
title_full_unstemmed Autopoietic Free Improvisation vs. Technototalitarian Regulation of Consciousness
title_sort autopoietic free improvisation vs. technototalitarian regulation of consciousness
publisher Institute of Philosophy of the Jagiellonian University
series The Polish Journal of Aesthetics
issn 2544-8242
2544-8242
publishDate 2019-09-01
description The elusive nature and the function of art occupy a highly contested territory within aesthetic philosophy since its inception. The present article also engages with the question of the nature and the function of art, though in a more narrowed and specific domain. The claim that is going to be tackled here is whether improvisation in art, in general, makes a statement against empirical science? To corroborate this claim I will look at specific artworks that offer a way of considering the function of art as something that can stand in opposition to empirical science and as something that therefore can offer an alternative understanding of consciousness. The main question is, “where does improvisation stand against the radical evolutionary positivist objectivization of consciousness?” To answer, we look at the emancipatory role of art that challenges the empiricism of modern science via investigating several artworks as signposts. We examine different types of improvisation by analyzing Joe Wight’s Darkest Hour (2017) and by drawing on the concept of autopoiesis, we define autopoietic improvisation as free improvisation. Then we draw on Charlie Brooker’s Black Mirror show (2011–present) to indicate that the idea of how indelible techno-totalitarianism, which envisages a dystopian future for mankind via the refinement and regulation of consciousness, offers a limited view of consciousness. Techno-totalitarianism stands as a key term to be defined and analyzed here as it is precisely the mechanism against and through which I will shape a new discourse of improvisation. Techno-totalitarianism is the state of digital rationalization and instrumentation of neuroscience in the regulation of human desire, choice, and behavior such as regulation and self-regulation are no longer distinguishable. We also discuss how finding a theory of everything and complete formula for consciousness means cutting new alleyways to utter annihilation of human will, improvisation or freedom in general.
topic anti-representational art
neuroscience
improvisation
self-objectivization
technototalitarianism
autopoiesis
consciousness
url https://pjaesthetics.uj.edu.pl/documents/138618288/143854005/PJA-54-mohammadi.pdf/6186efdf-2b32-4ead-8925-6abe3e86660e
work_keys_str_mv AT abolfazlmohammadi autopoieticfreeimprovisationvstechnototalitarianregulationofconsciousness
_version_ 1724345939505709056