Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods

Methods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jaroslaw Bilinski, Mikolaj Dziurzynski, Pawel Grzesiowski, Edyta Podsiadly, Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel, Tomasz Dzieciatkowski, Lukasz Dziewit, Grzegorz W. Basak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2036
id doaj-50cf965778b544e0b455127b4697adb0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50cf965778b544e0b455127b4697adb02020-11-25T02:49:20ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832020-06-0192036203610.3390/jcm9072036Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary MethodsJaroslaw Bilinski0Mikolaj Dziurzynski1Pawel Grzesiowski2Edyta Podsiadly3Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel4Tomasz Dzieciatkowski5Lukasz Dziewit6Grzegorz W. Basak7Department of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 02-096, Warsaw, PolandFoundation for the Infection Prevention Institute, 02-991 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-310 Rzeszów, PolandDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics and Clinical Immunology of Developmental Age, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandChair and Department of Medical Microbiology, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, 02-096, Warsaw, PolandDepartment of Hematology, Oncology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, PolandMethods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the proper selection of fecal donors and to find “super-donor” indicators. Ten consecutive stools donated by each of three donors were used for the experiments (30 stools in total). The experiments assessed bacterial viability measured by flow cytometry, stool culturing on different media and in various conditions, and NGS (90 samples in total). There were no statistically significant differences between live and dead cell numbers; however, we found a group of cells classified as not-dead-not-alive, which may be possibly important in selection of “good” donors. Donor C, being a regular stool donor, was characterized by the largest number of cultivable species (64). Cultivable core microbiota (shared by all donors) was composed of only 16 species. ANCOM analysis of NGS data highlighted particular genera to be more abundant in one donor vs. the others. There was a correlation between the not-dead-not-alive group found in flow cytometry and <i>Anaeroplasma</i> found by NGS, and we could distinguish a regular stool donor from the others. In this work, we showed that combining various methods of microbiota assessment gives more information than each method separately.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2036fecal microbiota transplantationfeces donorfecal microbiotaflow cytometryviability of bacterianext-generation sequencing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jaroslaw Bilinski
Mikolaj Dziurzynski
Pawel Grzesiowski
Edyta Podsiadly
Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel
Tomasz Dzieciatkowski
Lukasz Dziewit
Grzegorz W. Basak
spellingShingle Jaroslaw Bilinski
Mikolaj Dziurzynski
Pawel Grzesiowski
Edyta Podsiadly
Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel
Tomasz Dzieciatkowski
Lukasz Dziewit
Grzegorz W. Basak
Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
Journal of Clinical Medicine
fecal microbiota transplantation
feces donor
fecal microbiota
flow cytometry
viability of bacteria
next-generation sequencing
author_facet Jaroslaw Bilinski
Mikolaj Dziurzynski
Pawel Grzesiowski
Edyta Podsiadly
Anna Stelmaszczyk-Emmel
Tomasz Dzieciatkowski
Lukasz Dziewit
Grzegorz W. Basak
author_sort Jaroslaw Bilinski
title Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_short Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_full Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_fullStr Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_full_unstemmed Multimodal Approach to Assessment of Fecal Microbiota Donors based on Three Complementary Methods
title_sort multimodal approach to assessment of fecal microbiota donors based on three complementary methods
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Methods of stool assessment are mostly focused on next-generation sequencing (NGS) or classical culturing, but only rarely both. We conducted a series of experiments using a multi-method approach to trace the stability of gut microbiota in various donors over time, to find the best method for the proper selection of fecal donors and to find “super-donor” indicators. Ten consecutive stools donated by each of three donors were used for the experiments (30 stools in total). The experiments assessed bacterial viability measured by flow cytometry, stool culturing on different media and in various conditions, and NGS (90 samples in total). There were no statistically significant differences between live and dead cell numbers; however, we found a group of cells classified as not-dead-not-alive, which may be possibly important in selection of “good” donors. Donor C, being a regular stool donor, was characterized by the largest number of cultivable species (64). Cultivable core microbiota (shared by all donors) was composed of only 16 species. ANCOM analysis of NGS data highlighted particular genera to be more abundant in one donor vs. the others. There was a correlation between the not-dead-not-alive group found in flow cytometry and <i>Anaeroplasma</i> found by NGS, and we could distinguish a regular stool donor from the others. In this work, we showed that combining various methods of microbiota assessment gives more information than each method separately.
topic fecal microbiota transplantation
feces donor
fecal microbiota
flow cytometry
viability of bacteria
next-generation sequencing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/7/2036
work_keys_str_mv AT jaroslawbilinski multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT mikolajdziurzynski multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT pawelgrzesiowski multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT edytapodsiadly multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT annastelmaszczykemmel multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT tomaszdzieciatkowski multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT lukaszdziewit multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
AT grzegorzwbasak multimodalapproachtoassessmentoffecalmicrobiotadonorsbasedonthreecomplementarymethods
_version_ 1724744091078492160