The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2010-05-01
|
Series: | Korean Journal of Anesthesiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdf |
id |
doaj-50d0b090d2084bc1863e3c50fbb80afe |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-50d0b090d2084bc1863e3c50fbb80afe2020-11-25T03:39:17ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632010-05-0158545045710.4097/kjae.2010.58.5.4506900The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesiaYun Mi Choi0Su Man Cha1Hyun Kang2Chong Wha Baek3Yong Hun Jung4Young Cheol Woo5Jin Yun Kim6Gill Hoi Koo7Sun Gyoo Park8Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a SLIPA group (n = 30). Ease of use, first insertion success rate, hemodynamic responses to insertion, ventilatory efficiency and positioning confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy were assessed. Lung mechanics data were collected with side stream spirometry at 10 minutes after insertion. We also compared the incidence of blood stain, incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and other complications.ResultsFirst attempt success rates were 93.3% and 73.3%, and mean insertion time was 7.3 sec and 10.5 sec in PLMA and SLIPA. There was a significant rise in all of hemodynamic response from the pre-insertion value at one minute following insertion of SLIPA. But, insertion of PLMA was no significant rise in hemodynamic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maximum sealing pressure, gas leakage, lung mechanics data, gastric distension, postoperative sore throat and other complication between the two groups. Blood stain were noted on the surface of the device in 40% (n = 12) in the SLIPA vs. 6.7% (n = 2) in the PLMA.ConclusionsThe SLIPA is a useful alternative to the PLMA and have comparable efficacy and complication rates. If we acquire the skill to use, SLIPA may be considered as primary SGA devices during surgery under general anesthesia.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdfairwayanesthesiaplmaslipasupraglottic airway |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yun Mi Choi Su Man Cha Hyun Kang Chong Wha Baek Yong Hun Jung Young Cheol Woo Jin Yun Kim Gill Hoi Koo Sun Gyoo Park |
spellingShingle |
Yun Mi Choi Su Man Cha Hyun Kang Chong Wha Baek Yong Hun Jung Young Cheol Woo Jin Yun Kim Gill Hoi Koo Sun Gyoo Park The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia Korean Journal of Anesthesiology airway anesthesia plma slipa supraglottic airway |
author_facet |
Yun Mi Choi Su Man Cha Hyun Kang Chong Wha Baek Yong Hun Jung Young Cheol Woo Jin Yun Kim Gill Hoi Koo Sun Gyoo Park |
author_sort |
Yun Mi Choi |
title |
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia |
title_short |
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia |
title_full |
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia |
title_fullStr |
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia |
title_sort |
clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (slipa™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway proseal™ during general anesthesia |
publisher |
Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
series |
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology |
issn |
2005-6419 2005-7563 |
publishDate |
2010-05-01 |
description |
BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a SLIPA group (n = 30). Ease of use, first insertion success rate, hemodynamic responses to insertion, ventilatory efficiency and positioning confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy were assessed. Lung mechanics data were collected with side stream spirometry at 10 minutes after insertion. We also compared the incidence of blood stain, incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and other complications.ResultsFirst attempt success rates were 93.3% and 73.3%, and mean insertion time was 7.3 sec and 10.5 sec in PLMA and SLIPA. There was a significant rise in all of hemodynamic response from the pre-insertion value at one minute following insertion of SLIPA. But, insertion of PLMA was no significant rise in hemodynamic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maximum sealing pressure, gas leakage, lung mechanics data, gastric distension, postoperative sore throat and other complication between the two groups. Blood stain were noted on the surface of the device in 40% (n = 12) in the SLIPA vs. 6.7% (n = 2) in the PLMA.ConclusionsThe SLIPA is a useful alternative to the PLMA and have comparable efficacy and complication rates. If we acquire the skill to use, SLIPA may be considered as primary SGA devices during surgery under general anesthesia. |
topic |
airway anesthesia plma slipa supraglottic airway |
url |
http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yunmichoi theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT sumancha theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT hyunkang theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT chongwhabaek theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT yonghunjung theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT youngcheolwoo theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT jinyunkim theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT gillhoikoo theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT sungyoopark theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT yunmichoi clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT sumancha clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT hyunkang clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT chongwhabaek clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT yonghunjung clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT youngcheolwoo clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT jinyunkim clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT gillhoikoo clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia AT sungyoopark clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia |
_version_ |
1724539849813262336 |