The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yun Mi Choi, Su Man Cha, Hyun Kang, Chong Wha Baek, Yong Hun Jung, Young Cheol Woo, Jin Yun Kim, Gill Hoi Koo, Sun Gyoo Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2010-05-01
Series:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdf
id doaj-50d0b090d2084bc1863e3c50fbb80afe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-50d0b090d2084bc1863e3c50fbb80afe2020-11-25T03:39:17ZengKorean Society of AnesthesiologistsKorean Journal of Anesthesiology2005-64192005-75632010-05-0158545045710.4097/kjae.2010.58.5.4506900The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesiaYun Mi Choi0Su Man Cha1Hyun Kang2Chong Wha Baek3Yong Hun Jung4Young Cheol Woo5Jin Yun Kim6Gill Hoi Koo7Sun Gyoo Park8Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a SLIPA group (n = 30). Ease of use, first insertion success rate, hemodynamic responses to insertion, ventilatory efficiency and positioning confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy were assessed. Lung mechanics data were collected with side stream spirometry at 10 minutes after insertion. We also compared the incidence of blood stain, incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and other complications.ResultsFirst attempt success rates were 93.3% and 73.3%, and mean insertion time was 7.3 sec and 10.5 sec in PLMA and SLIPA. There was a significant rise in all of hemodynamic response from the pre-insertion value at one minute following insertion of SLIPA. But, insertion of PLMA was no significant rise in hemodynamic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maximum sealing pressure, gas leakage, lung mechanics data, gastric distension, postoperative sore throat and other complication between the two groups. Blood stain were noted on the surface of the device in 40% (n = 12) in the SLIPA vs. 6.7% (n = 2) in the PLMA.ConclusionsThe SLIPA is a useful alternative to the PLMA and have comparable efficacy and complication rates. If we acquire the skill to use, SLIPA may be considered as primary SGA devices during surgery under general anesthesia.http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdfairwayanesthesiaplmaslipasupraglottic airway
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yun Mi Choi
Su Man Cha
Hyun Kang
Chong Wha Baek
Yong Hun Jung
Young Cheol Woo
Jin Yun Kim
Gill Hoi Koo
Sun Gyoo Park
spellingShingle Yun Mi Choi
Su Man Cha
Hyun Kang
Chong Wha Baek
Yong Hun Jung
Young Cheol Woo
Jin Yun Kim
Gill Hoi Koo
Sun Gyoo Park
The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
airway
anesthesia
plma
slipa
supraglottic airway
author_facet Yun Mi Choi
Su Man Cha
Hyun Kang
Chong Wha Baek
Yong Hun Jung
Young Cheol Woo
Jin Yun Kim
Gill Hoi Koo
Sun Gyoo Park
author_sort Yun Mi Choi
title The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
title_short The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
title_full The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
title_fullStr The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ during general anesthesia
title_sort clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (slipa™) compared with the laryngeal mask airway proseal™ during general anesthesia
publisher Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
series Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 2005-6419
2005-7563
publishDate 2010-05-01
description BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA), a new supraglottic airway device (SGA), with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal™ (PLMA) during general anesthesia.MethodsSixty patients were randomly allocated to two groups; a PLMA group (n = 30) or a SLIPA group (n = 30). Ease of use, first insertion success rate, hemodynamic responses to insertion, ventilatory efficiency and positioning confirmed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy were assessed. Lung mechanics data were collected with side stream spirometry at 10 minutes after insertion. We also compared the incidence of blood stain, incidence and severity of postoperative sore throat and other complications.ResultsFirst attempt success rates were 93.3% and 73.3%, and mean insertion time was 7.3 sec and 10.5 sec in PLMA and SLIPA. There was a significant rise in all of hemodynamic response from the pre-insertion value at one minute following insertion of SLIPA. But, insertion of PLMA was no significant rise in hemodynamic response. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean maximum sealing pressure, gas leakage, lung mechanics data, gastric distension, postoperative sore throat and other complication between the two groups. Blood stain were noted on the surface of the device in 40% (n = 12) in the SLIPA vs. 6.7% (n = 2) in the PLMA.ConclusionsThe SLIPA is a useful alternative to the PLMA and have comparable efficacy and complication rates. If we acquire the skill to use, SLIPA may be considered as primary SGA devices during surgery under general anesthesia.
topic airway
anesthesia
plma
slipa
supraglottic airway
url http://ekja.org/upload/pdf/kjae-58-450.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT yunmichoi theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT sumancha theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT hyunkang theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT chongwhabaek theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT yonghunjung theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT youngcheolwoo theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT jinyunkim theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT gillhoikoo theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT sungyoopark theclinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT yunmichoi clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT sumancha clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT hyunkang clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT chongwhabaek clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT yonghunjung clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT youngcheolwoo clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT jinyunkim clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT gillhoikoo clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
AT sungyoopark clinicaleffectivenessofthestreamlinedlinerofpharyngealairwayslipacomparedwiththelaryngealmaskairwayprosealduringgeneralanesthesia
_version_ 1724539849813262336