Deep Space Network Scheduling via Mixed-Integer Linear Programming

NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) is a globally-spanning communications network responsible for supporting the interplanetary spacecraft missions of NASA and other international users. The DSN is a highly utilized asset, and the large demand for its’ services makes the assignment...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alex Sabol, Ryan Alimo, Farhad Kamangar, Ramtin Madani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2021-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9373338/
Description
Summary:NASA’s Deep Space Network (DSN) is a globally-spanning communications network responsible for supporting the interplanetary spacecraft missions of NASA and other international users. The DSN is a highly utilized asset, and the large demand for its’ services makes the assignment of DSN resources a daunting computational problem. In this paper we study the DSN scheduling problem, which is the problem of assigning the DSN’s limited resources to its users within a given time horizon. The DSN scheduling problem is oversubscribed, meaning that only a subset of the activities can be scheduled, and network operators must decide which activities to exclude from the schedule. We first formulate this challenging scheduling task as a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) optimization problem. Next, we develop a sequential algorithm which solves the resulting MILP formulation to produce valid schedules for large-scale instances of the DSN scheduling problem. We use real world DSN data from week 44 of 2016 in order to evaluate our algorithm’s performance. We find that given a fixed run time, our algorithm outperforms a simple implementation of our MILP model, generating a feasible schedule in which 17% more activities are scheduled by the algorithm than by the simple implementation. We design a non-MILP based heuristic to further validate our results. We find that our algorithm also outperforms this heuristic, scheduling 8% more activities and 20% more tracking time than the best results achieved by the non-MILP implementation.
ISSN:2169-3536