On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term

Introduction. Socio-philosophical research of the patterns of conflict being in modern discourse needs to be clarified from the perspective of ontology. The conflict specificity of closed society from an ideological perspective makes it possible to discover the ontological foundations of self-confli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: B. V. Kabylinskii
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University 2020-10-01
Series:Дискурс
Subjects:
Online Access:https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/338
id doaj-5115b0b7a38647d98e4699d251147924
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5115b0b7a38647d98e4699d2511479242021-07-28T13:10:55ZengSaint Petersburg Electrotechnical UniversityДискурс2412-85622658-77772020-10-0164394510.32603/2412-8562-2020-6-4-39-45336On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” TermB. V. Kabylinskii0Financial Academy, Nur-SultanIntroduction. Socio-philosophical research of the patterns of conflict being in modern discourse needs to be clarified from the perspective of ontology. The conflict specificity of closed society from an ideological perspective makes it possible to discover the ontological foundations of self-conflict-being. For the purpose of empirical reinforcement of conflict research, the relationship between conflict and ideology needs to be discovered in specific cases. North Korean sociocultural realities are among the most visible forms of closed society in modern discourse and provide wide opportunities for understanding the conflict reality modeled by ideological instruments of influence on mass consciousness.Methodology and sources. Methodologically, the work is based on philosophical texts on the themes of patterns, modeling, scientific instrumentation, the phenomenology of Husserl and Heidegger.Results and discussion. The pattern is understood as a systematic repetition of elements in conflict reality that occurs with ontological necessity, regardless of the variable features of being-in-conflict. The integration of patterns into the epistemological grid allows us to achieve a more symmetrical arrangement of elements in the system of philosophical knowledge of the conflict. The author analyzes patterns in space and time taking into account the axiological component in a conflict angle.Conclusion. The philosophical specificity of the conflict pattern consists in the ontological fixation of the perverted nature of Self and Other in relation to the initial stay in mutual harmony. In this regard, the epistemology of conflict acquires the opportunity to qualitatively update the structure of knowledge about the methods of difference between the existential mechanisms of existence of the Self and the Other. Therefore, characteristic distortions of harmonious moduses of i-in-conflict can be found in the corresponding patterns.https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/338patternconflictdiscourseconflict reality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author B. V. Kabylinskii
spellingShingle B. V. Kabylinskii
On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
Дискурс
pattern
conflict
discourse
conflict reality
author_facet B. V. Kabylinskii
author_sort B. V. Kabylinskii
title On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
title_short On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
title_full On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
title_fullStr On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
title_full_unstemmed On the Philosophic Meaning of the “Conflict Pattern” Term
title_sort on the philosophic meaning of the “conflict pattern” term
publisher Saint Petersburg Electrotechnical University
series Дискурс
issn 2412-8562
2658-7777
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Introduction. Socio-philosophical research of the patterns of conflict being in modern discourse needs to be clarified from the perspective of ontology. The conflict specificity of closed society from an ideological perspective makes it possible to discover the ontological foundations of self-conflict-being. For the purpose of empirical reinforcement of conflict research, the relationship between conflict and ideology needs to be discovered in specific cases. North Korean sociocultural realities are among the most visible forms of closed society in modern discourse and provide wide opportunities for understanding the conflict reality modeled by ideological instruments of influence on mass consciousness.Methodology and sources. Methodologically, the work is based on philosophical texts on the themes of patterns, modeling, scientific instrumentation, the phenomenology of Husserl and Heidegger.Results and discussion. The pattern is understood as a systematic repetition of elements in conflict reality that occurs with ontological necessity, regardless of the variable features of being-in-conflict. The integration of patterns into the epistemological grid allows us to achieve a more symmetrical arrangement of elements in the system of philosophical knowledge of the conflict. The author analyzes patterns in space and time taking into account the axiological component in a conflict angle.Conclusion. The philosophical specificity of the conflict pattern consists in the ontological fixation of the perverted nature of Self and Other in relation to the initial stay in mutual harmony. In this regard, the epistemology of conflict acquires the opportunity to qualitatively update the structure of knowledge about the methods of difference between the existential mechanisms of existence of the Self and the Other. Therefore, characteristic distortions of harmonious moduses of i-in-conflict can be found in the corresponding patterns.
topic pattern
conflict
discourse
conflict reality
url https://discourse.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/338
work_keys_str_mv AT bvkabylinskii onthephilosophicmeaningoftheconflictpatternterm
_version_ 1721276374751117312