A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels

A methodology for assessing the sustainability of hydrogen production using solid fuels is introduced, in which three sustainability dimensions (ecological, sociological and technological) are considered along with ten indicators for each dimension. Values for each indicator are assigned on a 10-poi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam, Bale V. Reddy, Marc A. Rosen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2010-05-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/6/1472/
id doaj-51260e658eb5493b9f3436aa8ac8c277
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51260e658eb5493b9f3436aa8ac8c2772020-11-24T23:24:43ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502010-05-01261472149110.3390/su2061472A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid FuelsNirmal V. GnanapragasamBale V. ReddyMarc A. RosenA methodology for assessing the sustainability of hydrogen production using solid fuels is introduced, in which three sustainability dimensions (ecological, sociological and technological) are considered along with ten indicators for each dimension. Values for each indicator are assigned on a 10-point scale based on a high of 1 and a low of 0, depending on the characteristic of the criteria associated with each element or process, utilizing data reported in the literature. An illustrative example is presented to compare two solid fuels for hydrogen production: coal and biomass. The results suggest that qualitative sustainability indicators can be reasonably defined based on evaluations of system feasibility, and that adequate flexibility and comprehensiveness is provided through the use of ten indicators for each of the dimensions for every process or element involved in hydrogen production using solid fuels. Also, the assessment index values suggest that biomasses have better sustainability than coals, and that it may be advantageous to use coals in combination with biomass to increase their ecological and social sustainability. The sustainability assessment methodology can be made increasingly quantitative, and is likely extendable to other energy systems, but additional research and development is needed to lead to a more fully developed approach. http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/6/1472/sustainabilitysolid fuelscoalbiomasshydrogen energyhydrogen production
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam
Bale V. Reddy
Marc A. Rosen
spellingShingle Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam
Bale V. Reddy
Marc A. Rosen
A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
Sustainability
sustainability
solid fuels
coal
biomass
hydrogen energy
hydrogen production
author_facet Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam
Bale V. Reddy
Marc A. Rosen
author_sort Nirmal V. Gnanapragasam
title A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
title_short A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
title_full A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
title_fullStr A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
title_full_unstemmed A Methodology for Assessing the Sustainability of Hydrogen Production from Solid Fuels
title_sort methodology for assessing the sustainability of hydrogen production from solid fuels
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2010-05-01
description A methodology for assessing the sustainability of hydrogen production using solid fuels is introduced, in which three sustainability dimensions (ecological, sociological and technological) are considered along with ten indicators for each dimension. Values for each indicator are assigned on a 10-point scale based on a high of 1 and a low of 0, depending on the characteristic of the criteria associated with each element or process, utilizing data reported in the literature. An illustrative example is presented to compare two solid fuels for hydrogen production: coal and biomass. The results suggest that qualitative sustainability indicators can be reasonably defined based on evaluations of system feasibility, and that adequate flexibility and comprehensiveness is provided through the use of ten indicators for each of the dimensions for every process or element involved in hydrogen production using solid fuels. Also, the assessment index values suggest that biomasses have better sustainability than coals, and that it may be advantageous to use coals in combination with biomass to increase their ecological and social sustainability. The sustainability assessment methodology can be made increasingly quantitative, and is likely extendable to other energy systems, but additional research and development is needed to lead to a more fully developed approach.
topic sustainability
solid fuels
coal
biomass
hydrogen energy
hydrogen production
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/6/1472/
work_keys_str_mv AT nirmalvgnanapragasam amethodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
AT balevreddy amethodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
AT marcarosen amethodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
AT nirmalvgnanapragasam methodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
AT balevreddy methodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
AT marcarosen methodologyforassessingthesustainabilityofhydrogenproductionfromsolidfuels
_version_ 1725559211662770176