Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+

Abstract For the long standing low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ , we propose an unquenched picture. Our calculation explicitly shows that the mass of the $$\Lambda _c(2P,3/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,3/2-) state can be lowered down to be consistent with the experimental data of $$\Lambda _c(2940...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Si-Qiang Luo, Bing Chen, Zhan-Wei Liu, Xiang Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2020-04-01
Series:European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7874-1
id doaj-5126bdf0f4074874a98db45c2f77a9e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5126bdf0f4074874a98db45c2f77a9e22020-11-25T02:19:14ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields1434-60441434-60522020-04-018041610.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7874-1Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+Si-Qiang Luo0Bing Chen1Zhan-Wei Liu2Xiang Liu3School of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou UniversitySchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Anhui Science and Technology UniversitySchool of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou UniversitySchool of Physical Science and Technology, Lanzhou UniversityAbstract For the long standing low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ , we propose an unquenched picture. Our calculation explicitly shows that the mass of the $$\Lambda _c(2P,3/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,3/2-) state can be lowered down to be consistent with the experimental data of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ by introducing the $$D^*N$$ D∗N channel contribution. It means that the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ can be solved. What is more important is that we predict a mass inversion relation for the 2P $$\Lambda _{c}^+$$ Λc+ states, i.e., the $$\Lambda _c(2P,1/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,1/2-) state is higher than the $$\Lambda _c(2P,3/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,3/2-) , which is totally different from the result of conventional quenched quark model. It provides a criterion to test such an unquenched scenario for $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ . We expect the future experimental progress from the LHCb and Belle II.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7874-1
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Si-Qiang Luo
Bing Chen
Zhan-Wei Liu
Xiang Liu
spellingShingle Si-Qiang Luo
Bing Chen
Zhan-Wei Liu
Xiang Liu
Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
author_facet Si-Qiang Luo
Bing Chen
Zhan-Wei Liu
Xiang Liu
author_sort Si-Qiang Luo
title Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
title_short Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
title_full Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
title_fullStr Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
title_full_unstemmed Resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+
title_sort resolving the low mass puzzle of $$\lambda _c(2940)^+$$ λc(2940)+
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Physical Journal C: Particles and Fields
issn 1434-6044
1434-6052
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Abstract For the long standing low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ , we propose an unquenched picture. Our calculation explicitly shows that the mass of the $$\Lambda _c(2P,3/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,3/2-) state can be lowered down to be consistent with the experimental data of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ by introducing the $$D^*N$$ D∗N channel contribution. It means that the low mass puzzle of $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ can be solved. What is more important is that we predict a mass inversion relation for the 2P $$\Lambda _{c}^+$$ Λc+ states, i.e., the $$\Lambda _c(2P,1/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,1/2-) state is higher than the $$\Lambda _c(2P,3/2^-)$$ Λc(2P,3/2-) , which is totally different from the result of conventional quenched quark model. It provides a criterion to test such an unquenched scenario for $$\Lambda _c(2940)^+$$ Λc(2940)+ . We expect the future experimental progress from the LHCb and Belle II.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7874-1
work_keys_str_mv AT siqiangluo resolvingthelowmasspuzzleoflambdac2940lc2940
AT bingchen resolvingthelowmasspuzzleoflambdac2940lc2940
AT zhanweiliu resolvingthelowmasspuzzleoflambdac2940lc2940
AT xiangliu resolvingthelowmasspuzzleoflambdac2940lc2940
_version_ 1724877444712759296