Salary survey methods: Comparability problems

Most organizations regard the accurate determination of prevailing labour market rates as being of primary importance to decisions regarding the setting of competitive wage and salary levels. The techniques involved in establishing these rates are fraught with problems, mainly revolving around effor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: R. J. Snelgar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AOSIS 1986-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Business Management
Online Access:https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1052
id doaj-512f7590d467446d9a3ba5f8b1b63a79
record_format Article
spelling doaj-512f7590d467446d9a3ba5f8b1b63a792021-04-02T14:35:55ZengAOSISSouth African Journal of Business Management2078-55852078-59761986-09-0117316917310.4102/sajbm.v17i3.1052769Salary survey methods: Comparability problemsR. J. Snelgar0Department of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, University of Port ElizabethMost organizations regard the accurate determination of prevailing labour market rates as being of primary importance to decisions regarding the setting of competitive wage and salary levels. The techniques involved in establishing these rates are fraught with problems, mainly revolving around efforts at obtaining comparability. Justification has been provided for organizations using tailor-made survey approaches in preference to professional or 'commercial' surveys, as this allows reduction to a minimum of such comparability problems as those associated with job description responsibilities, and compensation mix. This study reveals the extent to which a single pay structure received differing adjustments as a result of analysis of data obtained from a tailor-made survey approach as opposed to that obtained from a 'commercial' survey. Results indicate significant differences in adjustments over a three-year survey period, attributable essentially to the wide range of comparability difficulties associated with use of 'commercial' survey data.https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1052
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author R. J. Snelgar
spellingShingle R. J. Snelgar
Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
South African Journal of Business Management
author_facet R. J. Snelgar
author_sort R. J. Snelgar
title Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
title_short Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
title_full Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
title_fullStr Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
title_full_unstemmed Salary survey methods: Comparability problems
title_sort salary survey methods: comparability problems
publisher AOSIS
series South African Journal of Business Management
issn 2078-5585
2078-5976
publishDate 1986-09-01
description Most organizations regard the accurate determination of prevailing labour market rates as being of primary importance to decisions regarding the setting of competitive wage and salary levels. The techniques involved in establishing these rates are fraught with problems, mainly revolving around efforts at obtaining comparability. Justification has been provided for organizations using tailor-made survey approaches in preference to professional or 'commercial' surveys, as this allows reduction to a minimum of such comparability problems as those associated with job description responsibilities, and compensation mix. This study reveals the extent to which a single pay structure received differing adjustments as a result of analysis of data obtained from a tailor-made survey approach as opposed to that obtained from a 'commercial' survey. Results indicate significant differences in adjustments over a three-year survey period, attributable essentially to the wide range of comparability difficulties associated with use of 'commercial' survey data.
url https://sajbm.org/index.php/sajbm/article/view/1052
work_keys_str_mv AT rjsnelgar salarysurveymethodscomparabilityproblems
_version_ 1721561854328700928