Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
Introduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination hospital. We...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California
2015-10-01
|
Series: | Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
Online Access: | http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz |
id |
doaj-517dab26db624efaa466867f3196807e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-517dab26db624efaa466867f3196807e2020-11-24T22:46:15ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182015-10-0116574374610.5811/westjem.2015.7.26179Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center HospitalsNikolay Dimitrov0William Koenig1Nichole Bosson2Sarah Song3Jeffrey L. Saver4William J. Mack5Nerses Sanossian6University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaLos Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency, Los Angeles, CaliforniaLos Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency, Los Angeles, CaliforniaRush University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, Illinois University of California, Los Angeles Stroke Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaIntroduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination hospital. We surveyed all counties in the state of California for presence and characteristics of their prehospital stroke routing protocols. Methods: Each county’s local emergency medical services agency (LEMSA) was queried for the presence of a stroke routing protocol. We reviewed these protocols for method of stroke identification and criteria for patient transport to a stroke center. Results: Thirty-three LEMSAs serve 58 counties in California with populations ranging from 1,175 to nearly 10 million. Fifteen LEMSAs (45%) had stroke routing protocols, covering 23 counties (40%) and 68% of the state population. Counties with protocols had higher population density (1,500 vs. 140 persons per square mile). In the six counties without designated stroke centers, patients meeting criteria were transported out of county. Stroke identification in the field was achieved using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Screen in 72%, Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen in 7% and a county-specific protocol in 22%. Conclusion: California EMS prehospital acute stroke routing protocols cover 68% of the state population and vary in characteristics including activation by symptom onset time and destination facility features, reflecting matching of system design to local geographic resources.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nikolay Dimitrov William Koenig Nichole Bosson Sarah Song Jeffrey L. Saver William J. Mack Nerses Sanossian |
spellingShingle |
Nikolay Dimitrov William Koenig Nichole Bosson Sarah Song Jeffrey L. Saver William J. Mack Nerses Sanossian Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
author_facet |
Nikolay Dimitrov William Koenig Nichole Bosson Sarah Song Jeffrey L. Saver William J. Mack Nerses Sanossian |
author_sort |
Nikolay Dimitrov |
title |
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals |
title_short |
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals |
title_full |
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals |
title_fullStr |
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals |
title_sort |
variability in criteria for emergency medical services routing of acute stroke patients to designated stroke center hospitals |
publisher |
eScholarship Publishing, University of California |
series |
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine |
issn |
1936-900X 1936-9018 |
publishDate |
2015-10-01 |
description |
Introduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated
stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented
at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination
hospital. We surveyed all counties in the state of California for presence and characteristics of their
prehospital stroke routing protocols.
Methods: Each county’s local emergency medical services agency (LEMSA) was queried for the
presence of a stroke routing protocol. We reviewed these protocols for method of stroke identification
and criteria for patient transport to a stroke center.
Results: Thirty-three LEMSAs serve 58 counties in California with populations ranging from 1,175
to nearly 10 million. Fifteen LEMSAs (45%) had stroke routing protocols, covering 23 counties (40%)
and 68% of the state population. Counties with protocols had higher population density (1,500
vs. 140 persons per square mile). In the six counties without designated stroke centers, patients
meeting criteria were transported out of county. Stroke identification in the field was achieved using
the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Screen in 72%, Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen in 7% and
a county-specific protocol in 22%.
Conclusion: California EMS prehospital acute stroke routing protocols cover 68% of the state
population and vary in characteristics including activation by symptom onset time and destination
facility features, reflecting matching of system design to local geographic resources. |
url |
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nikolaydimitrov variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT williamkoenig variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT nicholebosson variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT sarahsong variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT jeffreylsaver variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT williamjmack variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals AT nersessanossian variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals |
_version_ |
1725685581044776960 |