Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals

Introduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination hospital. We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikolay Dimitrov, William Koenig, Nichole Bosson, Sarah Song, Jeffrey L. Saver, William J. Mack, Nerses Sanossian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2015-10-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz
id doaj-517dab26db624efaa466867f3196807e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-517dab26db624efaa466867f3196807e2020-11-24T22:46:15ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182015-10-0116574374610.5811/westjem.2015.7.26179Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center HospitalsNikolay Dimitrov0William Koenig1Nichole Bosson2Sarah Song3Jeffrey L. Saver4William J. Mack5Nerses Sanossian6University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaLos Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency, Los Angeles, CaliforniaLos Angeles County Emergency Medical Services Agency, Los Angeles, CaliforniaRush University, Department of Neurology, Chicago, Illinois University of California, Los Angeles Stroke Center, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaUniversity of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CaliforniaIntroduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination hospital. We surveyed all counties in the state of California for presence and characteristics of their prehospital stroke routing protocols. Methods: Each county’s local emergency medical services agency (LEMSA) was queried for the presence of a stroke routing protocol. We reviewed these protocols for method of stroke identification and criteria for patient transport to a stroke center. Results: Thirty-three LEMSAs serve 58 counties in California with populations ranging from 1,175 to nearly 10 million. Fifteen LEMSAs (45%) had stroke routing protocols, covering 23 counties (40%) and 68% of the state population. Counties with protocols had higher population density (1,500 vs. 140 persons per square mile). In the six counties without designated stroke centers, patients meeting criteria were transported out of county. Stroke identification in the field was achieved using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Screen in 72%, Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen in 7% and a county-specific protocol in 22%. Conclusion: California EMS prehospital acute stroke routing protocols cover 68% of the state population and vary in characteristics including activation by symptom onset time and destination facility features, reflecting matching of system design to local geographic resources.http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nikolay Dimitrov
William Koenig
Nichole Bosson
Sarah Song
Jeffrey L. Saver
William J. Mack
Nerses Sanossian
spellingShingle Nikolay Dimitrov
William Koenig
Nichole Bosson
Sarah Song
Jeffrey L. Saver
William J. Mack
Nerses Sanossian
Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
author_facet Nikolay Dimitrov
William Koenig
Nichole Bosson
Sarah Song
Jeffrey L. Saver
William J. Mack
Nerses Sanossian
author_sort Nikolay Dimitrov
title Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
title_short Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
title_full Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
title_fullStr Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Criteria for Emergency Medical Services Routing of Acute Stroke Patients to Designated Stroke Center Hospitals
title_sort variability in criteria for emergency medical services routing of acute stroke patients to designated stroke center hospitals
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
publishDate 2015-10-01
description Introduction: Comprehensive stroke systems of care include routing to the nearest designated stroke center hospital, bypassing non-designated hospitals. Routing protocols are implemented at the state or county level and vary in qualification criteria and determination of destination hospital. We surveyed all counties in the state of California for presence and characteristics of their prehospital stroke routing protocols. Methods: Each county’s local emergency medical services agency (LEMSA) was queried for the presence of a stroke routing protocol. We reviewed these protocols for method of stroke identification and criteria for patient transport to a stroke center. Results: Thirty-three LEMSAs serve 58 counties in California with populations ranging from 1,175 to nearly 10 million. Fifteen LEMSAs (45%) had stroke routing protocols, covering 23 counties (40%) and 68% of the state population. Counties with protocols had higher population density (1,500 vs. 140 persons per square mile). In the six counties without designated stroke centers, patients meeting criteria were transported out of county. Stroke identification in the field was achieved using the Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Screen in 72%, Los Angeles Prehospital Stroke Screen in 7% and a county-specific protocol in 22%. Conclusion: California EMS prehospital acute stroke routing protocols cover 68% of the state population and vary in characteristics including activation by symptom onset time and destination facility features, reflecting matching of system design to local geographic resources.
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/08p4f1fz
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaydimitrov variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT williamkoenig variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT nicholebosson variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT sarahsong variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT jeffreylsaver variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT williamjmack variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
AT nersessanossian variabilityincriteriaforemergencymedicalservicesroutingofacutestrokepatientstodesignatedstrokecenterhospitals
_version_ 1725685581044776960