Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia

Background: To compare binocular functions in amblyopic and non-amblyopic anisometropes and to investigate the possible associated factors for amblyopia development such as type of refractive error and initial age of refractive error correction. Materials and Methods: Prospectively anisometropic sub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huban Atilla, Necile Erkam
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2011-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2011;volume=59;issue=3;spage=215;epage=216;aulast=Atilla
id doaj-518adb268e02443bb592acca12a8d1da
record_format Article
spelling doaj-518adb268e02443bb592acca12a8d1da2020-11-24T21:20:05ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892011-01-0159321521610.4103/0301-4738.81035Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopiaHuban AtillaNecile ErkamBackground: To compare binocular functions in amblyopic and non-amblyopic anisometropes and to investigate the possible associated factors for amblyopia development such as type of refractive error and initial age of refractive error correction. Materials and Methods: Prospectively anisometropic subjects with (n=42) and without amblyopia (n=33) were included in the study. Full ophthalmological examination including binocularity and motility was performed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the ages at the time of initial refractive error correction ( p0 =0.946). All of the anisometropes (100%) had fusion with Worth 4-dot test and Bagolini glasses. However 81% of amblyopic subjects had fusion with Worth 4 dot test and 88.1% had normal response with Bagolini glasses. Median stereopsis was 60 sec of arc in anisometropic subjects and 400 sec of arc in amblyopes. Conclusion: Our data support that, binocular functions are well developed in anisometropes without amblyopia and initial age at correction of refractive error has no primary effect on development of amblyopia.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2011;volume=59;issue=3;spage=215;epage=216;aulast=AtillaAhmed glaucoma valvehypotonypost-penetrating-keratoplasty glaucomatube extrusionscleral patchRanibizumabbevacizumabchoroidal neovascular membraneage-related macular degenerationintravitreal injectioncentral macular thicknessbest corrected visual acuityIntravitreal injectionmethotrexatepharmacokineticsContrast sensitivitydiabetesglarepupil cycle timeAnemiadiabetic retinopathymicroalbuminuriaseverityObjective Structured Clinical ExaminationophthalmologyundergraduateAnisometropiaanisometropic amblyopiafusionstereopsis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huban Atilla
Necile Erkam
spellingShingle Huban Atilla
Necile Erkam
Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Ahmed glaucoma valve
hypotony
post-penetrating-keratoplasty glaucoma
tube extrusion
scleral patch
Ranibizumab
bevacizumab
choroidal neovascular membrane
age-related macular degeneration
intravitreal injection
central macular thickness
best corrected visual acuity
Intravitreal injection
methotrexate
pharmacokinetics
Contrast sensitivity
diabetes
glare
pupil cycle time
Anemia
diabetic retinopathy
microalbuminuria
severity
Objective Structured Clinical Examination
ophthalmology
undergraduate
Anisometropia
anisometropic amblyopia
fusion
stereopsis
author_facet Huban Atilla
Necile Erkam
author_sort Huban Atilla
title Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
title_short Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
title_full Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
title_fullStr Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
title_sort comparison of anisometropes with and without amblyopia
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Background: To compare binocular functions in amblyopic and non-amblyopic anisometropes and to investigate the possible associated factors for amblyopia development such as type of refractive error and initial age of refractive error correction. Materials and Methods: Prospectively anisometropic subjects with (n=42) and without amblyopia (n=33) were included in the study. Full ophthalmological examination including binocularity and motility was performed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the ages at the time of initial refractive error correction ( p0 =0.946). All of the anisometropes (100%) had fusion with Worth 4-dot test and Bagolini glasses. However 81% of amblyopic subjects had fusion with Worth 4 dot test and 88.1% had normal response with Bagolini glasses. Median stereopsis was 60 sec of arc in anisometropic subjects and 400 sec of arc in amblyopes. Conclusion: Our data support that, binocular functions are well developed in anisometropes without amblyopia and initial age at correction of refractive error has no primary effect on development of amblyopia.
topic Ahmed glaucoma valve
hypotony
post-penetrating-keratoplasty glaucoma
tube extrusion
scleral patch
Ranibizumab
bevacizumab
choroidal neovascular membrane
age-related macular degeneration
intravitreal injection
central macular thickness
best corrected visual acuity
Intravitreal injection
methotrexate
pharmacokinetics
Contrast sensitivity
diabetes
glare
pupil cycle time
Anemia
diabetic retinopathy
microalbuminuria
severity
Objective Structured Clinical Examination
ophthalmology
undergraduate
Anisometropia
anisometropic amblyopia
fusion
stereopsis
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2011;volume=59;issue=3;spage=215;epage=216;aulast=Atilla
work_keys_str_mv AT hubanatilla comparisonofanisometropeswithandwithoutamblyopia
AT necileerkam comparisonofanisometropeswithandwithoutamblyopia
_version_ 1726003952187604992