Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region

The nature of the limitations to the right to strike in essential and public services in the nine sub-regional countries of Southern Africa – South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe – is examined in this contribution. While all of these countries...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rochelle le Roux, Tamara Cohen
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2016-05-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1161/1103
id doaj-51a02c408ee643dfaaeb70ee30a461e8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51a02c408ee643dfaaeb70ee30a461e82020-11-25T03:04:36ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812016-05-0119125http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1161Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC RegionRochelle le Roux0Tamara Cohen1University of Cape TownUniversity of KwaZulu-NatalThe nature of the limitations to the right to strike in essential and public services in the nine sub-regional countries of Southern Africa – South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe – is examined in this contribution. While all of these countries share common influences and face common challenges, there appears to be a vast disparity in the approaches taken to the right to strike in public and essential services in the region. A brief overview of the demographics and labour markets in the countries under discussion is sketched, the salient features of the ILO's approach to strike in essential and public services is highlighted, and a broad overview of the contrasting and disparate approaches to essential and public services in the region is provided. The focus is, however, on the legislative approach taken to essential service employees in South Africa. It is concluded that – with the exception of South Africa and Namibia – the limitations to the right to strike of public sector employees exceed those endorsed by international conventions, and the broad definition of essential services generally relied upon effectivelyhttp://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1161/1103Right to strikeSADC regionessential servicespublic services
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rochelle le Roux
Tamara Cohen
spellingShingle Rochelle le Roux
Tamara Cohen
Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Right to strike
SADC region
essential services
public services
author_facet Rochelle le Roux
Tamara Cohen
author_sort Rochelle le Roux
title Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
title_short Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
title_full Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
title_fullStr Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Limitations to the Right to Strike in Essential and Public Services in the SADC Region
title_sort understanding the limitations to the right to strike in essential and public services in the sadc region
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2016-05-01
description The nature of the limitations to the right to strike in essential and public services in the nine sub-regional countries of Southern Africa – South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia and Zimbabwe – is examined in this contribution. While all of these countries share common influences and face common challenges, there appears to be a vast disparity in the approaches taken to the right to strike in public and essential services in the region. A brief overview of the demographics and labour markets in the countries under discussion is sketched, the salient features of the ILO's approach to strike in essential and public services is highlighted, and a broad overview of the contrasting and disparate approaches to essential and public services in the region is provided. The focus is, however, on the legislative approach taken to essential service employees in South Africa. It is concluded that – with the exception of South Africa and Namibia – the limitations to the right to strike of public sector employees exceed those endorsed by international conventions, and the broad definition of essential services generally relied upon effectively
topic Right to strike
SADC region
essential services
public services
url http://journals.assaf.org.za/per/article/view/1161/1103
work_keys_str_mv AT rochelleleroux understandingthelimitationstotherighttostrikeinessentialandpublicservicesinthesadcregion
AT tamaracohen understandingthelimitationstotherighttostrikeinessentialandpublicservicesinthesadcregion
_version_ 1724680873018654720