Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.

The shoulder relies heavily on coordinated muscle activity for normal function owing to its limited osseous constraint. However, previous studies have failed to examine the sophisticated interrelationship between all muscles. It is essential for these normal relationships to be defined as a basis fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David H Hawkes, Omid A Khaiyat, Anthony J Howard, Graham J Kemp, Simon P Frostick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211800
id doaj-51ac437f8adf4e66bac7f198ec71dc5b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51ac437f8adf4e66bac7f198ec71dc5b2021-03-19T05:31:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01142e021180010.1371/journal.pone.0211800Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.David H HawkesOmid A KhaiyatAnthony J HowardGraham J KempSimon P FrostickThe shoulder relies heavily on coordinated muscle activity for normal function owing to its limited osseous constraint. However, previous studies have failed to examine the sophisticated interrelationship between all muscles. It is essential for these normal relationships to be defined as a basis for understanding pathology. Therefore, the primary aim of the study was to investigate shoulder inter-muscular coordination during different planes of shoulder elevation. Twenty healthy subjects were included. Electromyography was recorded from 14 shoulder girdle muscles as subjects performed shoulder flexion, scapula plane elevation, abduction and extension. Cross-correlation was used to examine the coordination between different muscles and muscle groups. Significantly higher coordination existed between the rotator cuff and deltoid muscle groups during the initial (Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) = 0.79) and final (PCC = 0.74) stages of shoulder elevation compared to the mid-range (PCC = 0.34) (p = 0.020-0.035). Coordination between the deltoid and a functional adducting group comprising the latissimus dorsi and teres major was particularly high (PCC = 0.89) during early shoulder elevation. The destabilising force of the deltoid, during the initial stage of shoulder elevation, is balanced by the coordinated activity of the rotator cuff, latissimus dorsi and teres major. Stability requirements are lower during the mid-range of elevation. At the end-range of movement the demand for muscular stability again increases and higher coordination is seen between the deltoid and rotator cuff muscle groups. It is proposed that by appreciating the sophistication of normal shoulder function targeted evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for conditions such as subacromial impingement syndrome or shoulder instability can be developed.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211800
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David H Hawkes
Omid A Khaiyat
Anthony J Howard
Graham J Kemp
Simon P Frostick
spellingShingle David H Hawkes
Omid A Khaiyat
Anthony J Howard
Graham J Kemp
Simon P Frostick
Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet David H Hawkes
Omid A Khaiyat
Anthony J Howard
Graham J Kemp
Simon P Frostick
author_sort David H Hawkes
title Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
title_short Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
title_full Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
title_fullStr Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: An EMG study.
title_sort patterns of muscle coordination during dynamic glenohumeral joint elevation: an emg study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The shoulder relies heavily on coordinated muscle activity for normal function owing to its limited osseous constraint. However, previous studies have failed to examine the sophisticated interrelationship between all muscles. It is essential for these normal relationships to be defined as a basis for understanding pathology. Therefore, the primary aim of the study was to investigate shoulder inter-muscular coordination during different planes of shoulder elevation. Twenty healthy subjects were included. Electromyography was recorded from 14 shoulder girdle muscles as subjects performed shoulder flexion, scapula plane elevation, abduction and extension. Cross-correlation was used to examine the coordination between different muscles and muscle groups. Significantly higher coordination existed between the rotator cuff and deltoid muscle groups during the initial (Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC) = 0.79) and final (PCC = 0.74) stages of shoulder elevation compared to the mid-range (PCC = 0.34) (p = 0.020-0.035). Coordination between the deltoid and a functional adducting group comprising the latissimus dorsi and teres major was particularly high (PCC = 0.89) during early shoulder elevation. The destabilising force of the deltoid, during the initial stage of shoulder elevation, is balanced by the coordinated activity of the rotator cuff, latissimus dorsi and teres major. Stability requirements are lower during the mid-range of elevation. At the end-range of movement the demand for muscular stability again increases and higher coordination is seen between the deltoid and rotator cuff muscle groups. It is proposed that by appreciating the sophistication of normal shoulder function targeted evidence-based rehabilitation strategies for conditions such as subacromial impingement syndrome or shoulder instability can be developed.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211800
work_keys_str_mv AT davidhhawkes patternsofmusclecoordinationduringdynamicglenohumeraljointelevationanemgstudy
AT omidakhaiyat patternsofmusclecoordinationduringdynamicglenohumeraljointelevationanemgstudy
AT anthonyjhoward patternsofmusclecoordinationduringdynamicglenohumeraljointelevationanemgstudy
AT grahamjkemp patternsofmusclecoordinationduringdynamicglenohumeraljointelevationanemgstudy
AT simonpfrostick patternsofmusclecoordinationduringdynamicglenohumeraljointelevationanemgstudy
_version_ 1714778224072851456