Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii

Since its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert G. Hollingsworth, Luis F. Aristizábal, Suzanne Shriner, Gabriel M. Mascarin, Rafael de Andrade Moral, Steven P. Arthurs
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022/full
id doaj-51fe328d087140c59e879b6181643b73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-51fe328d087140c59e879b6181643b732020-11-25T02:28:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems2571-581X2020-03-01410.3389/fsufs.2020.00022509773Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in HawaiiRobert G. Hollingsworth0Luis F. Aristizábal1Suzanne Shriner2Gabriel M. Mascarin3Rafael de Andrade Moral4Steven P. Arthurs5USDA-ARS, Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Pacific Basin Agricultural Research Center, Hilo, HI, United StatesCoffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council, SHAC, Hilo, HI, United StatesCoffee Growers and Synergistic Hawaii Agriculture Council, SHAC, Hilo, HI, United StatesLaboratory of Environmental Microbiology, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Embrapa Environment, Jaguariúna, BrazilDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Maynooth University, Maynooth, IrelandBioBee USA, Altamonte Springs, FL, United StatesSince its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka‘u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4–5 vs. 7–11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022/fullbiological controlHypothenemus hampeimycoinsecticideCoffea arabicacoffee farms
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert G. Hollingsworth
Luis F. Aristizábal
Suzanne Shriner
Gabriel M. Mascarin
Rafael de Andrade Moral
Steven P. Arthurs
spellingShingle Robert G. Hollingsworth
Luis F. Aristizábal
Suzanne Shriner
Gabriel M. Mascarin
Rafael de Andrade Moral
Steven P. Arthurs
Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
biological control
Hypothenemus hampei
mycoinsecticide
Coffea arabica
coffee farms
author_facet Robert G. Hollingsworth
Luis F. Aristizábal
Suzanne Shriner
Gabriel M. Mascarin
Rafael de Andrade Moral
Steven P. Arthurs
author_sort Robert G. Hollingsworth
title Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
title_short Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
title_full Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
title_fullStr Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating Beauveria bassiana Into an Integrated Pest Management Plan for Coffee Berry Borer in Hawaii
title_sort incorporating beauveria bassiana into an integrated pest management plan for coffee berry borer in hawaii
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
issn 2571-581X
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Since its recent establishment in Hawaii, the coffee berry borer (CBB), Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), threatens yields, quality, and price of coffee production. A limited number of insecticides (primarily Beauveria bassiana) are used to control CBB with minimal disruption in this agroecosystem. We evaluated two insecticide spray strategies across eight coffee farms in the Kona and Ka‘u districts of Hawaii Island. Coffee growers sprayed insecticides approximately monthly (calendar basis) or else in response to CBB field monitoring data (threshold based). Overall, farms adopting spray thresholds performed more insecticide applications early in the season (May to July), but significantly fewer overall, when compared with calendar-based strategies (i.e., 4–5 vs. 7–11 seasonal sprays, respectively). Generalized linear models assessing the variability in CBB infestation rates, berry penetration, and infection by B. bassiana indicated that threshold-based sprays provided equivalent CBB control compared with calendar ones. When corrected for yield, there were economic savings for threshold- vs. calendar-based spray programs (i.e., cost 5.4 vs. 11.8% of gross yield). Total defects in processed coffee after harvest were statistically similar between the two spray regimes, i.e., 8.5 ± 1.0% and 10.4 ± 1.7%, respectively. We hypothesize that B. bassiana applied early in the season is more effective, since the fungus targets initial CBB infestations when the prolonged location of founder females in the outer berry endosperm favors its infection. Our study suggests that spray timing for CBB based on field monitoring data can reduce costs; however, additional measures, such as field and post-harvest sanitation, are necessary to achieve sustainable CBB control in the Islands.
topic biological control
Hypothenemus hampei
mycoinsecticide
Coffea arabica
coffee farms
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fsufs.2020.00022/full
work_keys_str_mv AT robertghollingsworth incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
AT luisfaristizabal incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
AT suzanneshriner incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
AT gabrielmmascarin incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
AT rafaeldeandrademoral incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
AT stevenparthurs incorporatingbeauveriabassianaintoanintegratedpestmanagementplanforcoffeeberryborerinhawaii
_version_ 1724837240054480896