Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR

In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and pr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benjamin Brede, Alvaro Lau, Harm M. Bartholomeus, Lammert Kooistra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
UAV
ALS
TLS
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2371
id doaj-5225a55b1d7d42829ff0853807f18732
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5225a55b1d7d42829ff0853807f187322020-11-24T21:10:35ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202017-10-011710237110.3390/s17102371s17102371Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDARBenjamin Brede0Alvaro Lau1Harm M. Bartholomeus2Lammert Kooistra3Laboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg, 36708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg, 36708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg, 36708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsLaboratory of Geo-Information Science and Remote Sensing, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg, 36708 PB Wageningen, The NetherlandsIn recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and produces relatively low point density, while TLS is labour intense and time demanding. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne laser scanning can be the way in between. In this study, we present first results and experiences with the RIEGL RiCOPTER with VUX ® -1UAV ALS system and compare it with the well tested RIEGL VZ-400 TLS system. We scanned the same forest plots with both systems over the course of two days. We derived Digital Terrain Model (DTMs), Digital Surface Model (DSMs) and finally Canopy Height Model (CHMs) from the resulting point clouds. ALS CHMs were on average 11.5 c m higher in five plots with different canopy conditions. This showed that TLS could not always detect the top of canopy. Moreover, we extracted trunk segments of 58 trees for ALS and TLS simultaneously, of which 39 could be used to model Diameter at Breast Height (DBH). ALS DBH showed a high agreement with TLS DBH with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and root mean square error of 4.24 c m . We conclude that RiCOPTER has the potential to perform comparable to TLS for estimating forest canopy height and DBH under the studied forest conditions. Further research should be directed to testing UAV-borne LiDAR for explicit 3D modelling of whole trees to estimate tree volume and subsequently Above-Ground Biomass (AGB).https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2371UAVLiDARALSTLSforest inventory
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Benjamin Brede
Alvaro Lau
Harm M. Bartholomeus
Lammert Kooistra
spellingShingle Benjamin Brede
Alvaro Lau
Harm M. Bartholomeus
Lammert Kooistra
Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
Sensors
UAV
LiDAR
ALS
TLS
forest inventory
author_facet Benjamin Brede
Alvaro Lau
Harm M. Bartholomeus
Lammert Kooistra
author_sort Benjamin Brede
title Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_short Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_full Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_fullStr Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_full_unstemmed Comparing RIEGL RiCOPTER UAV LiDAR Derived Canopy Height and DBH with Terrestrial LiDAR
title_sort comparing riegl ricopter uav lidar derived canopy height and dbh with terrestrial lidar
publisher MDPI AG
series Sensors
issn 1424-8220
publishDate 2017-10-01
description In recent years, LIght Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) and especially Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) systems have shown the potential to revolutionise forest structural characterisation by providing unprecedented 3D data. However, manned Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS) requires costly campaigns and produces relatively low point density, while TLS is labour intense and time demanding. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne laser scanning can be the way in between. In this study, we present first results and experiences with the RIEGL RiCOPTER with VUX ® -1UAV ALS system and compare it with the well tested RIEGL VZ-400 TLS system. We scanned the same forest plots with both systems over the course of two days. We derived Digital Terrain Model (DTMs), Digital Surface Model (DSMs) and finally Canopy Height Model (CHMs) from the resulting point clouds. ALS CHMs were on average 11.5 c m higher in five plots with different canopy conditions. This showed that TLS could not always detect the top of canopy. Moreover, we extracted trunk segments of 58 trees for ALS and TLS simultaneously, of which 39 could be used to model Diameter at Breast Height (DBH). ALS DBH showed a high agreement with TLS DBH with a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and root mean square error of 4.24 c m . We conclude that RiCOPTER has the potential to perform comparable to TLS for estimating forest canopy height and DBH under the studied forest conditions. Further research should be directed to testing UAV-borne LiDAR for explicit 3D modelling of whole trees to estimate tree volume and subsequently Above-Ground Biomass (AGB).
topic UAV
LiDAR
ALS
TLS
forest inventory
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/17/10/2371
work_keys_str_mv AT benjaminbrede comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT alvarolau comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT harmmbartholomeus comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
AT lammertkooistra comparingrieglricopteruavlidarderivedcanopyheightanddbhwithterrestriallidar
_version_ 1716755966145331200