Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects

Severe non-control Bronchial Asthma (BA) is a sufficient social problem with decreasing of quality of life, high index of disability and death. New biological drug — dupilumab — would improve the situation.Materials and methods. Markov’s model has been used for efficacy comparison of dupilumab and o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. S. Salasyuk, M. Yu. Frolov, I. N. Barykina
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Izdatelstvo OKI 2019-10-01
Series:Качественная клиническая практика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/448
id doaj-5273a6eb313e4bd8a3d27af02bf6558d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5273a6eb313e4bd8a3d27af02bf6558d2020-11-25T03:33:33ZrusIzdatelstvo OKIКачественная клиническая практика2588-05192618-84732019-10-0102152410.24411/2588-0519-2019-10069441Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspectsA. S. Salasyuk0M. Yu. Frolov1I. N. Barykina2FGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical UniversityFGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical UniversityFGBOU VO Volgograd State Medical UniversitySevere non-control Bronchial Asthma (BA) is a sufficient social problem with decreasing of quality of life, high index of disability and death. New biological drug — dupilumab — would improve the situation.Materials and methods. Markov’s model has been used for efficacy comparison of dupilumab and omalizumab with cycles between remissions and exacerbations of BA with interval as 4 weeks. Target population was 287naive patients per year which can be treated with dupilumab instead omalizumab. Non-direct comparison has shown that clinical efficacy of dupilumab was higher vs omalizaumab (prevention of 4,2 and 2,4 exacerbations/year accordingly, p<0,05). Horizon of budget impact analysis (BIA) was 3 years, and discounting rate was 5 %. Only direct costs were used (drugs’ costs, expenditures due to hospitalizations and out-patients department treatment).Results. Cost of dupilumab was 1 013 012 RUR/patient/year, that less on 182,2 thsd RUR than in omalizaumab case (16,04 %). Dupilumab can reduce expenditures in frames of Governmental Guarantees Program on 58,3 mln. RUR for the first year, and 162,2 mln. RUR during 3 —years horizon (16,13 % saving). Direct costs reduction with dupilumab can explain by less expenditures on the cours of therapy as well as decreasing cost of hospitalization and out-patients cure.Conclusion. Hypothesis about possibilities of dupilumab inclusion into reimbursement programs has been confirmed from clinical-economic point of view.https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/448bronchial asthmadupilumabomalizumabhealth-technology assessment
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A. S. Salasyuk
M. Yu. Frolov
I. N. Barykina
spellingShingle A. S. Salasyuk
M. Yu. Frolov
I. N. Barykina
Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
Качественная клиническая практика
bronchial asthma
dupilumab
omalizumab
health-technology assessment
author_facet A. S. Salasyuk
M. Yu. Frolov
I. N. Barykina
author_sort A. S. Salasyuk
title Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
title_short Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
title_full Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
title_fullStr Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
title_full_unstemmed Dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
title_sort dupilumab in the treatment of severe non-control broncial asthma — economic aspects
publisher Izdatelstvo OKI
series Качественная клиническая практика
issn 2588-0519
2618-8473
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Severe non-control Bronchial Asthma (BA) is a sufficient social problem with decreasing of quality of life, high index of disability and death. New biological drug — dupilumab — would improve the situation.Materials and methods. Markov’s model has been used for efficacy comparison of dupilumab and omalizumab with cycles between remissions and exacerbations of BA with interval as 4 weeks. Target population was 287naive patients per year which can be treated with dupilumab instead omalizumab. Non-direct comparison has shown that clinical efficacy of dupilumab was higher vs omalizaumab (prevention of 4,2 and 2,4 exacerbations/year accordingly, p<0,05). Horizon of budget impact analysis (BIA) was 3 years, and discounting rate was 5 %. Only direct costs were used (drugs’ costs, expenditures due to hospitalizations and out-patients department treatment).Results. Cost of dupilumab was 1 013 012 RUR/patient/year, that less on 182,2 thsd RUR than in omalizaumab case (16,04 %). Dupilumab can reduce expenditures in frames of Governmental Guarantees Program on 58,3 mln. RUR for the first year, and 162,2 mln. RUR during 3 —years horizon (16,13 % saving). Direct costs reduction with dupilumab can explain by less expenditures on the cours of therapy as well as decreasing cost of hospitalization and out-patients cure.Conclusion. Hypothesis about possibilities of dupilumab inclusion into reimbursement programs has been confirmed from clinical-economic point of view.
topic bronchial asthma
dupilumab
omalizumab
health-technology assessment
url https://www.clinvest.ru/jour/article/view/448
work_keys_str_mv AT assalasyuk dupilumabinthetreatmentofseverenoncontrolbroncialasthmaeconomicaspects
AT myufrolov dupilumabinthetreatmentofseverenoncontrolbroncialasthmaeconomicaspects
AT inbarykina dupilumabinthetreatmentofseverenoncontrolbroncialasthmaeconomicaspects
_version_ 1724563047670874112