A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation
Indirect reciprocity is one of the basic mechanisms to sustain mutual cooperation, by which beneficial acts are returned, not by the recipient, but by third parties. This mechanism relies on the ability of individuals to know the past actions of others, and to assess those actions. There are many di...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-02-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Physics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2018.00014/full |
id |
doaj-5278e0da72d84b82ab6992712aec7c41 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5278e0da72d84b82ab6992712aec7c412020-11-25T00:37:38ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Physics2296-424X2018-02-01610.3389/fphy.2018.00014316301A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of CooperationSatoshi Uchida0Hitoshi Yamamoto1Isamu Okada2Tatsuya Sasaki3Tatsuya Sasaki4Research Center for Ethi-Culture Studies, RINRI Institute, Tokyo, JapanFaculty of Business Administration, Rissho University, Tokyo, JapanFaculty of Business Administration, Soka University, Tokyo, JapanFaculty of Mathematics, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaF-Power Inc., Tokyo, JapanIndirect reciprocity is one of the basic mechanisms to sustain mutual cooperation, by which beneficial acts are returned, not by the recipient, but by third parties. This mechanism relies on the ability of individuals to know the past actions of others, and to assess those actions. There are many different systems of assessing others, which can be interpreted as rudimentary social norms (i.e., views on what is “good” or “bad”). In this paper, impacts of different adaptive architectures, i.e., ways for individuals to adapt to environments, on indirect reciprocity are investigated. We examine two representative architectures: one based on replicator dynamics and the other on genetic algorithm. Different from the replicator dynamics, the genetic algorithm requires describing the mixture of all possible norms in the norm space under consideration. Therefore, we also propose an analytic method to study norm ecosystems in which all possible second order social norms potentially exist and compete. The analysis reveals that the different adaptive architectures show different paths to the evolution of cooperation. Especially we find that so called Stern-Judging, one of the best studied norms in the literature, exhibits distinct behaviors in both architectures. On one hand, in the replicator dynamics, Stern-Judging remains alive and gets a majority steadily when the population reaches a cooperative state. On the other hand, in the genetic algorithm, it gets a majority only temporarily and becomes extinct in the end.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2018.00014/fullevolutionary game theoryevolution of cooperationindirect reciprocitysocial normsecosystemsadaptive systems |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Satoshi Uchida Hitoshi Yamamoto Isamu Okada Tatsuya Sasaki Tatsuya Sasaki |
spellingShingle |
Satoshi Uchida Hitoshi Yamamoto Isamu Okada Tatsuya Sasaki Tatsuya Sasaki A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation Frontiers in Physics evolutionary game theory evolution of cooperation indirect reciprocity social norms ecosystems adaptive systems |
author_facet |
Satoshi Uchida Hitoshi Yamamoto Isamu Okada Tatsuya Sasaki Tatsuya Sasaki |
author_sort |
Satoshi Uchida |
title |
A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation |
title_short |
A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation |
title_full |
A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation |
title_fullStr |
A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Theoretical Approach to Norm Ecosystems: Two Adaptive Architectures of Indirect Reciprocity Show Different Paths to the Evolution of Cooperation |
title_sort |
theoretical approach to norm ecosystems: two adaptive architectures of indirect reciprocity show different paths to the evolution of cooperation |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Physics |
issn |
2296-424X |
publishDate |
2018-02-01 |
description |
Indirect reciprocity is one of the basic mechanisms to sustain mutual cooperation, by which beneficial acts are returned, not by the recipient, but by third parties. This mechanism relies on the ability of individuals to know the past actions of others, and to assess those actions. There are many different systems of assessing others, which can be interpreted as rudimentary social norms (i.e., views on what is “good” or “bad”). In this paper, impacts of different adaptive architectures, i.e., ways for individuals to adapt to environments, on indirect reciprocity are investigated. We examine two representative architectures: one based on replicator dynamics and the other on genetic algorithm. Different from the replicator dynamics, the genetic algorithm requires describing the mixture of all possible norms in the norm space under consideration. Therefore, we also propose an analytic method to study norm ecosystems in which all possible second order social norms potentially exist and compete. The analysis reveals that the different adaptive architectures show different paths to the evolution of cooperation. Especially we find that so called Stern-Judging, one of the best studied norms in the literature, exhibits distinct behaviors in both architectures. On one hand, in the replicator dynamics, Stern-Judging remains alive and gets a majority steadily when the population reaches a cooperative state. On the other hand, in the genetic algorithm, it gets a majority only temporarily and becomes extinct in the end. |
topic |
evolutionary game theory evolution of cooperation indirect reciprocity social norms ecosystems adaptive systems |
url |
http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphy.2018.00014/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT satoshiuchida atheoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT hitoshiyamamoto atheoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT isamuokada atheoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT tatsuyasasaki atheoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT tatsuyasasaki atheoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT satoshiuchida theoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT hitoshiyamamoto theoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT isamuokada theoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT tatsuyasasaki theoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation AT tatsuyasasaki theoreticalapproachtonormecosystemstwoadaptivearchitecturesofindirectreciprocityshowdifferentpathstotheevolutionofcooperation |
_version_ |
1725300263785332736 |