The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Background. This study was designed to determine whether or not gait training based on the use of treadmill with visual biofeedback and body weight support (BWS) would produce better effects in patients with subacute stroke compared to BWS treadmill training with no visual biofeedback. Materials and...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2018-01-01
|
Series: | BioMed Research International |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3812602 |
id |
doaj-52a356e71a864138b7b976e8df6fb82b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-52a356e71a864138b7b976e8df6fb82b2020-11-25T01:00:55ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412018-01-01201810.1155/2018/38126023812602The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled TrialMariusz Drużbicki0Grzegorz Przysada1Agnieszka Guzik2Agnieszka Brzozowska-Magoń3Krzysztof Kołodziej4Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda5Joanna Majewska6Andrzej Kwolek7Institute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandInstitute of Physiotherapy, University of Rzeszów, Warszawska 26a, Rzeszów, PolandBackground. This study was designed to determine whether or not gait training based on the use of treadmill with visual biofeedback and body weight support (BWS) would produce better effects in patients with subacute stroke compared to BWS treadmill training with no visual biofeedback. Materials and Methods. 30 patients with subacute stroke were randomly assigned to do body weight supported treadmill training with visual biofeedback (BB group) or BWS treadmill training without visual biofeedback. Their gait was assessed with a 3D system (spatiotemporal gait parameters and symmetry index) and by means of 2-minute walk test (2 MWT), 10-metre walk test (10 MWT), and Timed Up & Go test. Subjects in both groups participated in 15 treadmill training sessions (30 minutes each). Results. The participants from both groups achieved a statistically significant improvement in spatiotemporal gait parameters, walking speed, endurance, and mobility. The average change in the BB group after the end of the programme did not differ significantly compared to the change in the control group. The change in the symmetry index value of stance phase in the BB group was 0.03 (0.02) and in the control group was 0.02 (0.02). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.902). The statistically significantly higher improvement in the BB group was found in the range of walking speed (p=0.003) and endurance (p=0.012), but the difference between groups was of low clinical significance. Conclusions. The findings do not confirm that BWS treadmill training with the function of visual biofeedback leads to significantly greater improvement in gait compared to BWS treadmill training with no visual biofeedback at an early stage after stroke. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: ACTRN12616001283460.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3812602 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mariusz Drużbicki Grzegorz Przysada Agnieszka Guzik Agnieszka Brzozowska-Magoń Krzysztof Kołodziej Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda Joanna Majewska Andrzej Kwolek |
spellingShingle |
Mariusz Drużbicki Grzegorz Przysada Agnieszka Guzik Agnieszka Brzozowska-Magoń Krzysztof Kołodziej Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda Joanna Majewska Andrzej Kwolek The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial BioMed Research International |
author_facet |
Mariusz Drużbicki Grzegorz Przysada Agnieszka Guzik Agnieszka Brzozowska-Magoń Krzysztof Kołodziej Andzelina Wolan-Nieroda Joanna Majewska Andrzej Kwolek |
author_sort |
Mariusz Drużbicki |
title |
The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short |
The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full |
The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr |
The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Efficacy of Gait Training Using a Body Weight Support Treadmill and Visual Biofeedback in Patients with Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort |
efficacy of gait training using a body weight support treadmill and visual biofeedback in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
BioMed Research International |
issn |
2314-6133 2314-6141 |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Background. This study was designed to determine whether or not gait training based on the use of treadmill with visual biofeedback and body weight support (BWS) would produce better effects in patients with subacute stroke compared to BWS treadmill training with no visual biofeedback. Materials and Methods. 30 patients with subacute stroke were randomly assigned to do body weight supported treadmill training with visual biofeedback (BB group) or BWS treadmill training without visual biofeedback. Their gait was assessed with a 3D system (spatiotemporal gait parameters and symmetry index) and by means of 2-minute walk test (2 MWT), 10-metre walk test (10 MWT), and Timed Up & Go test. Subjects in both groups participated in 15 treadmill training sessions (30 minutes each). Results. The participants from both groups achieved a statistically significant improvement in spatiotemporal gait parameters, walking speed, endurance, and mobility. The average change in the BB group after the end of the programme did not differ significantly compared to the change in the control group. The change in the symmetry index value of stance phase in the BB group was 0.03 (0.02) and in the control group was 0.02 (0.02). The difference was not statistically significant (p=0.902). The statistically significantly higher improvement in the BB group was found in the range of walking speed (p=0.003) and endurance (p=0.012), but the difference between groups was of low clinical significance. Conclusions. The findings do not confirm that BWS treadmill training with the function of visual biofeedback leads to significantly greater improvement in gait compared to BWS treadmill training with no visual biofeedback at an early stage after stroke. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: ACTRN12616001283460. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3812602 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariuszdruzbicki theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grzegorzprzysada theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT agnieszkaguzik theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT agnieszkabrzozowskamagon theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krzysztofkołodziej theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andzelinawolannieroda theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT joannamajewska theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andrzejkwolek theefficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mariuszdruzbicki efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT grzegorzprzysada efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT agnieszkaguzik efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT agnieszkabrzozowskamagon efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT krzysztofkołodziej efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andzelinawolannieroda efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT joannamajewska efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT andrzejkwolek efficacyofgaittrainingusingabodyweightsupporttreadmillandvisualbiofeedbackinpatientswithsubacutestrokearandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1725211984365879296 |