Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to share human biological samples, associated data and results across disease-specific and population-based human research biobanks is becoming increasingly important for research into disease development and translation....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Knoppers Bartha, Tassé Anne, Budin-Ljøsne Isabelle, Harris Jennifer R
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-10-01
Series:BMC Medical Genomics
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/4/69
id doaj-52b3e8d9d718439887778999d591e0df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52b3e8d9d718439887778999d591e0df2021-04-02T07:49:11ZengBMCBMC Medical Genomics1755-87942011-10-01416910.1186/1755-8794-4-69Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?Knoppers BarthaTassé AnneBudin-Ljøsne IsabelleHarris Jennifer R<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to share human biological samples, associated data and results across disease-specific and population-based human research biobanks is becoming increasingly important for research into disease development and translation. Although informed consent often does not anticipate such cross-domain sharing, it is important to examine its plausibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of bridging consent between disease-specific and population-based research. Comparative analyses of 1) current ethical and legal frameworks governing consent and 2) informed consent models found in disease-specific and population-based research were conducted.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ethical and legal frameworks governing consent dissuade cross-domain data sharing. Paradoxically, analysis of consent models for disease-specific and population-based research reveals such a high degree of similarity that bridging consent could be possible if additional information regarding bridging was incorporated into consent forms. We submit that bridging of consent could be supported if current trends endorsing a new interpretation of consent are adopted. To illustrate this we sketch potential bridging consent scenarios.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>A bridging consent, respectful of the spirit of initial consent, is feasible and would require only small changes to the content of consents currently being used. Under a bridging consent approach, the initial data and samples collection can serve an identified research project as well as contribute to the creation of a resource for a range of other projects.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/4/69
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Knoppers Bartha
Tassé Anne
Budin-Ljøsne Isabelle
Harris Jennifer R
spellingShingle Knoppers Bartha
Tassé Anne
Budin-Ljøsne Isabelle
Harris Jennifer R
Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
BMC Medical Genomics
author_facet Knoppers Bartha
Tassé Anne
Budin-Ljøsne Isabelle
Harris Jennifer R
author_sort Knoppers Bartha
title Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
title_short Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
title_full Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
title_fullStr Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
title_full_unstemmed Bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
title_sort bridging consent: from toll bridges to lift bridges?
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Genomics
issn 1755-8794
publishDate 2011-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The ability to share human biological samples, associated data and results across disease-specific and population-based human research biobanks is becoming increasingly important for research into disease development and translation. Although informed consent often does not anticipate such cross-domain sharing, it is important to examine its plausibility. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of bridging consent between disease-specific and population-based research. Comparative analyses of 1) current ethical and legal frameworks governing consent and 2) informed consent models found in disease-specific and population-based research were conducted.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>Ethical and legal frameworks governing consent dissuade cross-domain data sharing. Paradoxically, analysis of consent models for disease-specific and population-based research reveals such a high degree of similarity that bridging consent could be possible if additional information regarding bridging was incorporated into consent forms. We submit that bridging of consent could be supported if current trends endorsing a new interpretation of consent are adopted. To illustrate this we sketch potential bridging consent scenarios.</p> <p>Summary</p> <p>A bridging consent, respectful of the spirit of initial consent, is feasible and would require only small changes to the content of consents currently being used. Under a bridging consent approach, the initial data and samples collection can serve an identified research project as well as contribute to the creation of a resource for a range of other projects.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1755-8794/4/69
work_keys_str_mv AT knoppersbartha bridgingconsentfromtollbridgestoliftbridges
AT tasseanne bridgingconsentfromtollbridgestoliftbridges
AT budinljøsneisabelle bridgingconsentfromtollbridgestoliftbridges
AT harrisjenniferr bridgingconsentfromtollbridgestoliftbridges
_version_ 1724170778003374080