Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions

Established practice is available as a reference for evaluating sustainable transport and CO2 emissions at national, European and global levels, but comparing corresponding systems at the regional and local levels are more challenging. Therefore, this paper analyses the use of indicators, evaluation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kerstin Robertson, Annika Jägerbrand, Jan R. Eriksson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-04-01
Series:Challenges
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/55
id doaj-52d961c9cbc94e76998c90796a291120
record_format Article
spelling doaj-52d961c9cbc94e76998c90796a2911202020-11-24T20:48:26ZengMDPI AGChallenges2078-15472015-04-0161557010.3390/challe6010055challe6010055Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 EmissionsKerstin Robertson0Annika Jägerbrand1Jan R. Eriksson2Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, SE-581 95 Linköping, SwedenSwedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, Box 55685, SE-102 15 Stockholm, SwedenSwedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, SE-581 95 Linköping, SwedenEstablished practice is available as a reference for evaluating sustainable transport and CO2 emissions at national, European and global levels, but comparing corresponding systems at the regional and local levels are more challenging. Therefore, this paper analyses the use of indicators, evaluation methods and data availability at local and regional levels for applied policies and measures in transport planning. Sweden is used as a case study. Available data show that total surveys (e.g., vehicle registry data), sample surveys (e.g., interviews) or modelling can be used to develop transport indicators, and that either generated (volume generated in the area) or performed (volume in the area) traffic and transportation is estimated. However, there are limitations with all methods and the design of evaluations needs careful consideration in order to reflect changes in local and regional transport systems and to relate those changes to specific measures and policies. In most cases, survey methods need to be used in order to follow up the most common indicators. All evaluation methods need to be complemented with analyses of a baseline to determine additionality and also potential rebound effects need to be considered, which requires the application of a wider systems perspective.http://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/55trafficlocalregionalevaluationcarbon dioxide emissionsdecouplingtransport planning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kerstin Robertson
Annika Jägerbrand
Jan R. Eriksson
spellingShingle Kerstin Robertson
Annika Jägerbrand
Jan R. Eriksson
Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
Challenges
traffic
local
regional
evaluation
carbon dioxide emissions
decoupling
transport planning
author_facet Kerstin Robertson
Annika Jägerbrand
Jan R. Eriksson
author_sort Kerstin Robertson
title Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
title_short Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
title_full Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
title_fullStr Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
title_full_unstemmed Regional Transport Indicators Used in Sweden for Measurement, Reporting and Verification of CO2 Emissions
title_sort regional transport indicators used in sweden for measurement, reporting and verification of co2 emissions
publisher MDPI AG
series Challenges
issn 2078-1547
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Established practice is available as a reference for evaluating sustainable transport and CO2 emissions at national, European and global levels, but comparing corresponding systems at the regional and local levels are more challenging. Therefore, this paper analyses the use of indicators, evaluation methods and data availability at local and regional levels for applied policies and measures in transport planning. Sweden is used as a case study. Available data show that total surveys (e.g., vehicle registry data), sample surveys (e.g., interviews) or modelling can be used to develop transport indicators, and that either generated (volume generated in the area) or performed (volume in the area) traffic and transportation is estimated. However, there are limitations with all methods and the design of evaluations needs careful consideration in order to reflect changes in local and regional transport systems and to relate those changes to specific measures and policies. In most cases, survey methods need to be used in order to follow up the most common indicators. All evaluation methods need to be complemented with analyses of a baseline to determine additionality and also potential rebound effects need to be considered, which requires the application of a wider systems perspective.
topic traffic
local
regional
evaluation
carbon dioxide emissions
decoupling
transport planning
url http://www.mdpi.com/2078-1547/6/1/55
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstinrobertson regionaltransportindicatorsusedinswedenformeasurementreportingandverificationofco2emissions
AT annikajagerbrand regionaltransportindicatorsusedinswedenformeasurementreportingandverificationofco2emissions
AT janreriksson regionaltransportindicatorsusedinswedenformeasurementreportingandverificationofco2emissions
_version_ 1716807703722983424