Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
Over the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Growing Science
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Project Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdf |
id |
doaj-53271dca21e948e5b27731e624515a30 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-53271dca21e948e5b27731e624515a302020-11-25T00:40:02ZengGrowing ScienceJournal of Project Management2371-83662371-83742020-01-015111610.5267/j.jpm.2019.8.003Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfoliosNima Golghamat RaadMohsen Akbarpour ShiraziS.H. GhodsypourOver the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both theory and practice. One of the yet unspoiled topics in this field is improving and balancing the efficiency of sub-portfolios while paying attention to portfolio optimization. This study employs data-mining tools to categorize projects into sub-portfolios and rank them. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are also used to weigh the criteria on which the ranking process is based. Finally, a novel multi-objective model is designed to optimize the efficiency of sub-portfolios and the gain of the main portfolio. The model is solved by NSGA II algorithm. This study introduces a hybrid framework by which project portfolio selection process can be carried out regarding strategic alignment, cost, and risk.http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdfProject Portfolio SelectionPrioritizationClusteringNeural NetworkFAHPMultiobjective Programming |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nima Golghamat Raad Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi S.H. Ghodsypour |
spellingShingle |
Nima Golghamat Raad Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi S.H. Ghodsypour Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios Journal of Project Management Project Portfolio Selection Prioritization Clustering Neural Network FAHP Multiobjective Programming |
author_facet |
Nima Golghamat Raad Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi S.H. Ghodsypour |
author_sort |
Nima Golghamat Raad |
title |
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
title_short |
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
title_full |
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
title_fullStr |
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
title_full_unstemmed |
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
title_sort |
selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios |
publisher |
Growing Science |
series |
Journal of Project Management |
issn |
2371-8366 2371-8374 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Over the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both theory and practice. One of the yet unspoiled topics in this field is improving and balancing the efficiency of sub-portfolios while paying attention to portfolio optimization. This study employs data-mining tools to categorize projects into sub-portfolios and rank them. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are also used to weigh the criteria on which the ranking process is based. Finally, a novel multi-objective model is designed to optimize the efficiency of sub-portfolios and the gain of the main portfolio. The model is solved by NSGA II algorithm. This study introduces a hybrid framework by which project portfolio selection process can be carried out regarding strategic alignment, cost, and risk. |
topic |
Project Portfolio Selection Prioritization Clustering Neural Network FAHP Multiobjective Programming |
url |
http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nimagolghamatraad selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios AT mohsenakbarpourshirazi selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios AT shghodsypour selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios |
_version_ |
1725291802018185216 |