Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios

Over the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nima Golghamat Raad, Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi, S.H. Ghodsypour
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Growing Science 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Project Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdf
id doaj-53271dca21e948e5b27731e624515a30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53271dca21e948e5b27731e624515a302020-11-25T00:40:02ZengGrowing ScienceJournal of Project Management2371-83662371-83742020-01-015111610.5267/j.jpm.2019.8.003Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfoliosNima Golghamat RaadMohsen Akbarpour ShiraziS.H. GhodsypourOver the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both theory and practice. One of the yet unspoiled topics in this field is improving and balancing the efficiency of sub-portfolios while paying attention to portfolio optimization. This study employs data-mining tools to categorize projects into sub-portfolios and rank them. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are also used to weigh the criteria on which the ranking process is based. Finally, a novel multi-objective model is designed to optimize the efficiency of sub-portfolios and the gain of the main portfolio. The model is solved by NSGA II algorithm. This study introduces a hybrid framework by which project portfolio selection process can be carried out regarding strategic alignment, cost, and risk.http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdfProject Portfolio SelectionPrioritizationClusteringNeural NetworkFAHPMultiobjective Programming
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nima Golghamat Raad
Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi
S.H. Ghodsypour
spellingShingle Nima Golghamat Raad
Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi
S.H. Ghodsypour
Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
Journal of Project Management
Project Portfolio Selection
Prioritization
Clustering
Neural Network
FAHP
Multiobjective Programming
author_facet Nima Golghamat Raad
Mohsen Akbarpour Shirazi
S.H. Ghodsypour
author_sort Nima Golghamat Raad
title Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
title_short Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
title_full Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
title_fullStr Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
title_full_unstemmed Selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
title_sort selecting a portfolio of projects considering both optimization and balance of sub-portfolios
publisher Growing Science
series Journal of Project Management
issn 2371-8366
2371-8374
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Over the past four decades, portfolio selection has been one of the most important con-cerns of researchers, project managers, project-oriented companies, and public agencies around the world. Although numerous studies have been done in this field, still there is a room for more improvement in both theory and practice. One of the yet unspoiled topics in this field is improving and balancing the efficiency of sub-portfolios while paying attention to portfolio optimization. This study employs data-mining tools to categorize projects into sub-portfolios and rank them. Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are also used to weigh the criteria on which the ranking process is based. Finally, a novel multi-objective model is designed to optimize the efficiency of sub-portfolios and the gain of the main portfolio. The model is solved by NSGA II algorithm. This study introduces a hybrid framework by which project portfolio selection process can be carried out regarding strategic alignment, cost, and risk.
topic Project Portfolio Selection
Prioritization
Clustering
Neural Network
FAHP
Multiobjective Programming
url http://www.growingscience.com/jpm/Vol5/jpm_2019_24.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nimagolghamatraad selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios
AT mohsenakbarpourshirazi selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios
AT shghodsypour selectingaportfolioofprojectsconsideringbothoptimizationandbalanceofsubportfolios
_version_ 1725291802018185216