Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions

Degradations in external, acoustic stimulation have long been suspected to increase the load on working memory. One neural signature of working memory load is enhanced power of alpha oscillations (6 ‒ 12 Hz). However, it is unknown to what extent common internal, auditory degradation, that is, heari...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eline Borch Petersen, Malte eWöstmann, Jonas eObleser, Stefan eStenfelt, Thomas eLunner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177/full
id doaj-534d5f9eaddf4a6eb40eca389d728b97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-534d5f9eaddf4a6eb40eca389d728b972020-11-24T23:38:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782015-02-01610.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177120014Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditionsEline Borch Petersen0Eline Borch Petersen1Eline Borch Petersen2Malte eWöstmann3Malte eWöstmann4Jonas eObleser5Stefan eStenfelt6Stefan eStenfelt7Thomas eLunner8Thomas eLunner9Eriksholm Research CentreLinköping UniversityLinnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesInternational Max Planck Research School on Neuroscience of CommunicationMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain SciencesLinköping UniversityLinnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchEriksholm Research CentreLinnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability ResearchDegradations in external, acoustic stimulation have long been suspected to increase the load on working memory. One neural signature of working memory load is enhanced power of alpha oscillations (6 ‒ 12 Hz). However, it is unknown to what extent common internal, auditory degradation, that is, hearing impairment, affects the neural mechanisms of working memory when audibility has been ensured via amplification. Using an adapted auditory Sternberg paradigm, we varied the orthogonal factors memory load and background noise level, while the electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. In each trial, participants were presented with 2, 4, or 6 spoken digits embedded in one of three different levels of background noise. After a stimulus-free delay interval, participants indicated whether a probe digit had appeared in the sequence of digits. Participants were healthy older adults (62 – 86 years), with normal to moderately impaired hearing. Importantly, the background noise levels were individually adjusted and participants were wearing hearing aids to equalize audibility across participants. Irrespective of hearing loss, behavioral performance improved with lower memory load and also with lower levels of background noise. Interestingly, the alpha power in the stimulus-free delay interval was dependent on the interplay between task demands (memory load and noise level) and hearing loss; while alpha power increased with hearing loss during low and intermediate levels of memory load and background noise, it dropped for participants with the relatively most severe hearing loss under the highest memory load and background noise level. These findings suggest that adaptive neural mechanisms for coping with adverse listening conditions break down for higher degrees of hearing loss, even when adequate hearing aid amplification is in place.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177/fullCognitionHearing Losshearing aidworking memoryAlpha oscillations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Malte eWöstmann
Malte eWöstmann
Jonas eObleser
Stefan eStenfelt
Stefan eStenfelt
Thomas eLunner
Thomas eLunner
spellingShingle Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Malte eWöstmann
Malte eWöstmann
Jonas eObleser
Stefan eStenfelt
Stefan eStenfelt
Thomas eLunner
Thomas eLunner
Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
Frontiers in Psychology
Cognition
Hearing Loss
hearing aid
working memory
Alpha oscillations
author_facet Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Eline Borch Petersen
Malte eWöstmann
Malte eWöstmann
Jonas eObleser
Stefan eStenfelt
Stefan eStenfelt
Thomas eLunner
Thomas eLunner
author_sort Eline Borch Petersen
title Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
title_short Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
title_full Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
title_fullStr Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
title_full_unstemmed Hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
title_sort hearing loss impacts neural alpha oscillations under adverse listening conditions
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Degradations in external, acoustic stimulation have long been suspected to increase the load on working memory. One neural signature of working memory load is enhanced power of alpha oscillations (6 ‒ 12 Hz). However, it is unknown to what extent common internal, auditory degradation, that is, hearing impairment, affects the neural mechanisms of working memory when audibility has been ensured via amplification. Using an adapted auditory Sternberg paradigm, we varied the orthogonal factors memory load and background noise level, while the electroencephalogram (EEG) was recorded. In each trial, participants were presented with 2, 4, or 6 spoken digits embedded in one of three different levels of background noise. After a stimulus-free delay interval, participants indicated whether a probe digit had appeared in the sequence of digits. Participants were healthy older adults (62 – 86 years), with normal to moderately impaired hearing. Importantly, the background noise levels were individually adjusted and participants were wearing hearing aids to equalize audibility across participants. Irrespective of hearing loss, behavioral performance improved with lower memory load and also with lower levels of background noise. Interestingly, the alpha power in the stimulus-free delay interval was dependent on the interplay between task demands (memory load and noise level) and hearing loss; while alpha power increased with hearing loss during low and intermediate levels of memory load and background noise, it dropped for participants with the relatively most severe hearing loss under the highest memory load and background noise level. These findings suggest that adaptive neural mechanisms for coping with adverse listening conditions break down for higher degrees of hearing loss, even when adequate hearing aid amplification is in place.
topic Cognition
Hearing Loss
hearing aid
working memory
Alpha oscillations
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elineborchpetersen hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT elineborchpetersen hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT elineborchpetersen hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT malteewostmann hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT malteewostmann hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT jonaseobleser hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT stefanestenfelt hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT stefanestenfelt hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT thomaselunner hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
AT thomaselunner hearinglossimpactsneuralalphaoscillationsunderadverselisteningconditions
_version_ 1725516458377609216