Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
Optimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects. This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays. This paper explores whether innovative mechanis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
TU Delft Open
2010-03-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research |
Online Access: | https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866 |
id |
doaj-5364d520ab1044ca98685add9b05b534 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5364d520ab1044ca98685add9b05b5342021-07-26T08:46:22ZengTU Delft OpenEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412010-03-0110110.18757/ejtir.2010.10.1.28662488Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking ApproachMatti Siemiatycki0University of TorontoOptimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects. This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays. This paper explores whether innovative mechanisms of collecting and publicly disseminating information about the performance of government contractors on past projects can contribute to improving the success rate of future initiatives. Drawing on international examples from North America, Europe and Asia, it is found that the production and dissemination of greater information through benchmarking does not on its own lead to reductions in the prevalence of optimism biases. However, there is evidence that when combined with incentives built formally into government procurement processes that reward strong past performance, benchmarking can support improvements in the quality of project outputs.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Matti Siemiatycki |
spellingShingle |
Matti Siemiatycki Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research |
author_facet |
Matti Siemiatycki |
author_sort |
Matti Siemiatycki |
title |
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach |
title_short |
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach |
title_full |
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach |
title_fullStr |
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach |
title_sort |
managing optimism biases in the delivery of large-infrastructure projects: a corporate performance benchmarking approach |
publisher |
TU Delft Open |
series |
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research |
issn |
1567-7141 |
publishDate |
2010-03-01 |
description |
Optimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects. This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays. This paper explores whether innovative mechanisms of collecting and publicly disseminating information about the performance of government contractors on past projects can contribute to improving the success rate of future initiatives. Drawing on international examples from North America, Europe and Asia, it is found that the production and dissemination of greater information through benchmarking does not on its own lead to reductions in the prevalence of optimism biases. However, there is evidence that when combined with incentives built formally into government procurement processes that reward strong past performance, benchmarking can support improvements in the quality of project outputs. |
url |
https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mattisiemiatycki managingoptimismbiasesinthedeliveryoflargeinfrastructureprojectsacorporateperformancebenchmarkingapproach |
_version_ |
1721281952070238208 |