Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach

Optimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects.  This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays.  This paper explores whether innovative mechanis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matti Siemiatycki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: TU Delft Open 2010-03-01
Series:European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
Online Access:https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866
id doaj-5364d520ab1044ca98685add9b05b534
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5364d520ab1044ca98685add9b05b5342021-07-26T08:46:22ZengTU Delft OpenEuropean Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research1567-71412010-03-0110110.18757/ejtir.2010.10.1.28662488Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking ApproachMatti Siemiatycki0University of TorontoOptimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects.  This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays.  This paper explores whether innovative mechanisms of collecting and publicly disseminating information about the performance of government contractors on past projects can contribute to improving the success rate of future initiatives.  Drawing on international examples from North America, Europe and Asia, it is found that the production and dissemination of greater information through benchmarking does not on its own lead to reductions in the prevalence of optimism biases.  However, there is evidence that when combined with incentives built formally into government procurement processes that reward strong past performance, benchmarking can support improvements in the quality of project outputs.https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matti Siemiatycki
spellingShingle Matti Siemiatycki
Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
author_facet Matti Siemiatycki
author_sort Matti Siemiatycki
title Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
title_short Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
title_full Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
title_fullStr Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
title_full_unstemmed Managing Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure Projects: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach
title_sort managing optimism biases in the delivery of large-infrastructure projects: a corporate performance benchmarking approach
publisher TU Delft Open
series European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research
issn 1567-7141
publishDate 2010-03-01
description Optimism bias has been a considerable challenge in the planning and delivery of public services, particularly infrastructure mega projects.  This has resulted in consistently underestimated costs and overestimated benefits, as well as delivery delays.  This paper explores whether innovative mechanisms of collecting and publicly disseminating information about the performance of government contractors on past projects can contribute to improving the success rate of future initiatives.  Drawing on international examples from North America, Europe and Asia, it is found that the production and dissemination of greater information through benchmarking does not on its own lead to reductions in the prevalence of optimism biases.  However, there is evidence that when combined with incentives built formally into government procurement processes that reward strong past performance, benchmarking can support improvements in the quality of project outputs.
url https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/ejtir/article/view/2866
work_keys_str_mv AT mattisiemiatycki managingoptimismbiasesinthedeliveryoflargeinfrastructureprojectsacorporateperformancebenchmarkingapproach
_version_ 1721281952070238208