Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobili...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: In Kyong Yi, Hyun Jeong Kwak, Kyung Cheon Lee, Ji Hyea Lee, Sang Kee Min, Jong Yeop Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-08-01
Series:European Journal of Medical Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0
id doaj-53879c78535847eda3c529eba57c0758
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53879c78535847eda3c529eba57c07582020-11-25T03:49:37ZengBMCEuropean Journal of Medical Research2047-783X2020-08-012511710.1186/s40001-020-00435-0Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trialIn Kyong Yi0Hyun Jeong Kwak1Kyung Cheon Lee2Ji Hyea Lee3Sang Kee Min4Jong Yeop Kim5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University, Gil Medical CenterDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of MedicineDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Ajou University School of MedicineAbstract Background The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin models. Methods Thirty-five anesthesia nurses without previous intubation experience were recruited. Participants performed endotracheal intubation in a manikin model at two simulated neck positions (normal and fixed neck via cervical immobilization), using three different devices three times each. Performance parameters included intubation time, success rate of intubation, Cormack Lehane laryngoscope grading, dental click, and subjective difficulty score. Results Intubation time and success rate during first attempt were not significantly different between the 3 groups in normal airway manikin. In the cervical immobilized manikin, the intubation time was shorter (p = 0.012), and the success rate with the first attempt was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when using McGrath VL and Pentax AWS compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. Both VLs showed less difficulty score (p < 0.001) and more Cormack Lehane grade I (p < 0.001) in both scenarios. The incidence of dental clicks was higher with Macintosh laryngoscope compared with McGrath VL in cervical immobilized airway (p < 0.001). Conclusions McGrath VL and Pentax AWS did not show clinically significant decrease in intubation time, however, they achieved higher first attempt success rate, easier intubation and better glottis view compared with Macintosh laryngoscope by novices in a cervical immobilized manikin model. McGrath VL may reduce the risk of dental injury compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in cervical immobilized scenario. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161730), May 22, 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/homhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0LaryngoscopyIntubationVideolaryngoscopeCervical immobilizationNovice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author In Kyong Yi
Hyun Jeong Kwak
Kyung Cheon Lee
Ji Hyea Lee
Sang Kee Min
Jong Yeop Kim
spellingShingle In Kyong Yi
Hyun Jeong Kwak
Kyung Cheon Lee
Ji Hyea Lee
Sang Kee Min
Jong Yeop Kim
Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
European Journal of Medical Research
Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Videolaryngoscope
Cervical immobilization
Novice
author_facet In Kyong Yi
Hyun Jeong Kwak
Kyung Cheon Lee
Ji Hyea Lee
Sang Kee Min
Jong Yeop Kim
author_sort In Kyong Yi
title Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
title_short Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
title_full Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
title_fullStr Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of McGrath, Pentax, and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
title_sort comparison of mcgrath, pentax, and macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novices: a randomized crossover trial
publisher BMC
series European Journal of Medical Research
issn 2047-783X
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract Background The aim of this study was to compare tracheal intubation performance regarding the time to intubation, glottic view, difficulty, and dental click, by novices using McGrath videolaryngoscope (VL), Pentax Airway Scope (AWS) and Macintosh laryngoscope in normal and cervical immobilized manikin models. Methods Thirty-five anesthesia nurses without previous intubation experience were recruited. Participants performed endotracheal intubation in a manikin model at two simulated neck positions (normal and fixed neck via cervical immobilization), using three different devices three times each. Performance parameters included intubation time, success rate of intubation, Cormack Lehane laryngoscope grading, dental click, and subjective difficulty score. Results Intubation time and success rate during first attempt were not significantly different between the 3 groups in normal airway manikin. In the cervical immobilized manikin, the intubation time was shorter (p = 0.012), and the success rate with the first attempt was significantly higher (p < 0.001) when using McGrath VL and Pentax AWS compared with Macintosh laryngoscope. Both VLs showed less difficulty score (p < 0.001) and more Cormack Lehane grade I (p < 0.001) in both scenarios. The incidence of dental clicks was higher with Macintosh laryngoscope compared with McGrath VL in cervical immobilized airway (p < 0.001). Conclusions McGrath VL and Pentax AWS did not show clinically significant decrease in intubation time, however, they achieved higher first attempt success rate, easier intubation and better glottis view compared with Macintosh laryngoscope by novices in a cervical immobilized manikin model. McGrath VL may reduce the risk of dental injury compared with Macintosh laryngoscope in cervical immobilized scenario. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03161730), May 22, 2017 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/hom
topic Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Videolaryngoscope
Cervical immobilization
Novice
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40001-020-00435-0
work_keys_str_mv AT inkyongyi comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT hyunjeongkwak comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT kyungcheonlee comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT jihyealee comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT sangkeemin comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
AT jongyeopkim comparisonofmcgrathpentaxandmacintoshlaryngoscopeinnormalandcervicalimmobilizedmanikinbynovicesarandomizedcrossovertrial
_version_ 1724494368172146688