No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign

<p>Safe driving campaigns frequently use threat-appeals to portray the consequences of risky driving and generate negative emotion. However, increasing perceived risk is often ineffective in motivating behaviour change. A potential approach to increasing the efficacy of safe driving campaigns...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emma Kesterton Rait
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Federation of Psychology Students' Associations 2019-04-01
Series:Journal of European Psychology Students
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/451
id doaj-53c2f1e362564eedbaf059c25441eb8b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53c2f1e362564eedbaf059c25441eb8b2020-11-25T03:43:32ZengEuropean Federation of Psychology Students' AssociationsJournal of European Psychology Students2222-69312019-04-0110211110.5334/jeps.451108No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaignEmma Kesterton Rait0University of the Highlands and Islands<p>Safe driving campaigns frequently use threat-appeals to portray the consequences of risky driving and generate negative emotion. However, increasing perceived risk is often ineffective in motivating behaviour change. A potential approach to increasing the efficacy of safe driving campaigns is the incorporation of emotion regulation strategies. This study used an independent-groups experimental design with a sample of 53 participants (21 males, 32 females) aged 18–65 years (<em>M</em> = 43) to investigate if employing the emotion regulation strategies of distraction and cognitive reappraisal reduces negative emotion while viewing a distracted driving campaign film. Findings revealed that employing emotion regulation strategies significantly reduced negative emotion with a medium effect size, in comparison to the control condition, confirming the hypothesis.</p>https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/451emotion regulationdistracted drivingreappraisaldistractionbehaviour changethreat-appeal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emma Kesterton Rait
spellingShingle Emma Kesterton Rait
No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
Journal of European Psychology Students
emotion regulation
distracted driving
reappraisal
distraction
behaviour change
threat-appeal
author_facet Emma Kesterton Rait
author_sort Emma Kesterton Rait
title No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
title_short No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
title_full No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
title_fullStr No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
title_full_unstemmed No text Is worth dying for: The role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
title_sort no text is worth dying for: the role of emotion regulation in a distracted driving campaign
publisher European Federation of Psychology Students' Associations
series Journal of European Psychology Students
issn 2222-6931
publishDate 2019-04-01
description <p>Safe driving campaigns frequently use threat-appeals to portray the consequences of risky driving and generate negative emotion. However, increasing perceived risk is often ineffective in motivating behaviour change. A potential approach to increasing the efficacy of safe driving campaigns is the incorporation of emotion regulation strategies. This study used an independent-groups experimental design with a sample of 53 participants (21 males, 32 females) aged 18–65 years (<em>M</em> = 43) to investigate if employing the emotion regulation strategies of distraction and cognitive reappraisal reduces negative emotion while viewing a distracted driving campaign film. Findings revealed that employing emotion regulation strategies significantly reduced negative emotion with a medium effect size, in comparison to the control condition, confirming the hypothesis.</p>
topic emotion regulation
distracted driving
reappraisal
distraction
behaviour change
threat-appeal
url https://jeps.efpsa.org/articles/451
work_keys_str_mv AT emmakestertonrait notextisworthdyingfortheroleofemotionregulationinadistracteddrivingcampaign
_version_ 1724519179007033344