Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.

The aim of this study was to assess and compare the maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) between intermediate, advanced and elite climbers using several different methods for calculating RFD. Fifty-seven male climbers (17 intermediate, 25 advanced, and 15 elite) performed isometric pull...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolay Stien, Vegard Albert Vereide, Atle Hole Saeterbakken, Espen Hermans, Matthew Peter Shaw, Vidar Andersen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249353
id doaj-53d5bd8f16884564aeecfe48ea9a1e56
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53d5bd8f16884564aeecfe48ea9a1e562021-04-09T04:30:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01163e024935310.1371/journal.pone.0249353Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.Nicolay StienVegard Albert VereideAtle Hole SaeterbakkenEspen HermansMatthew Peter ShawVidar AndersenThe aim of this study was to assess and compare the maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) between intermediate, advanced and elite climbers using several different methods for calculating RFD. Fifty-seven male climbers (17 intermediate, 25 advanced, and 15 elite) performed isometric pull-ups on a climbing-specific hold while the RFD was calculated using several absolute (50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 ms from onset of force) and relative time periods (25, 50, 75, 95, and 100% of time to peak force). The maximal force was higher among elite climbers compared to advanced (ES = 1.78, p < 0.001) and intermediate climbers (ES = 1.77, p < 0.001), while no difference was observed between intermediate and advanced climbers (P = 0.898). The elite group also showed higher RFD than the other two groups at all relative time periods (ES = 1.02-1.58, p < 0.001-0.002), whereas the absolute time periods only revealed differences between the elite vs. the other groups at 50, 100 and 150 ms from the onset of force (ES = 0.72-0.84, p = 0.032-0.040). No differences in RFD were observed between the intermediate and advanced groups at any time period (p = 0.942-1.000). Maximal force and RFD, especially calculated using the longer periods of the force curve, may be used to distinguish elite climbers from advanced and intermediate climbers. The authors suggest using relative rather than absolute time periods when analyzing the RFD of climbers.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249353
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolay Stien
Vegard Albert Vereide
Atle Hole Saeterbakken
Espen Hermans
Matthew Peter Shaw
Vidar Andersen
spellingShingle Nicolay Stien
Vegard Albert Vereide
Atle Hole Saeterbakken
Espen Hermans
Matthew Peter Shaw
Vidar Andersen
Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nicolay Stien
Vegard Albert Vereide
Atle Hole Saeterbakken
Espen Hermans
Matthew Peter Shaw
Vidar Andersen
author_sort Nicolay Stien
title Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
title_short Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
title_full Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
title_fullStr Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
title_full_unstemmed Upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
title_sort upper body rate of force development and maximal strength discriminates performance levels in sport climbing.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2021-01-01
description The aim of this study was to assess and compare the maximal force and rate of force development (RFD) between intermediate, advanced and elite climbers using several different methods for calculating RFD. Fifty-seven male climbers (17 intermediate, 25 advanced, and 15 elite) performed isometric pull-ups on a climbing-specific hold while the RFD was calculated using several absolute (50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 ms from onset of force) and relative time periods (25, 50, 75, 95, and 100% of time to peak force). The maximal force was higher among elite climbers compared to advanced (ES = 1.78, p < 0.001) and intermediate climbers (ES = 1.77, p < 0.001), while no difference was observed between intermediate and advanced climbers (P = 0.898). The elite group also showed higher RFD than the other two groups at all relative time periods (ES = 1.02-1.58, p < 0.001-0.002), whereas the absolute time periods only revealed differences between the elite vs. the other groups at 50, 100 and 150 ms from the onset of force (ES = 0.72-0.84, p = 0.032-0.040). No differences in RFD were observed between the intermediate and advanced groups at any time period (p = 0.942-1.000). Maximal force and RFD, especially calculated using the longer periods of the force curve, may be used to distinguish elite climbers from advanced and intermediate climbers. The authors suggest using relative rather than absolute time periods when analyzing the RFD of climbers.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0249353
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolaystien upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
AT vegardalbertvereide upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
AT atleholesaeterbakken upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
AT espenhermans upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
AT matthewpetershaw upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
AT vidarandersen upperbodyrateofforcedevelopmentandmaximalstrengthdiscriminatesperformancelevelsinsportclimbing
_version_ 1714685956957667328