JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs

Abstract Understanding edge formation represents a key question in network analysis. Various approaches have been postulated across disciplines ranging from network growth models to statistical (regression) methods. In this work, we extend this existing arsenal of methods with JANUS, a hypothesis-dr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lisette Espín-Noboa, Florian Lemmerich, Markus Strohmaier, Philipp Singer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-06-01
Series:Applied Network Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-017-0036-1
id doaj-53d71d8a031148e78eacd8e8ac14e7f9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53d71d8a031148e78eacd8e8ac14e7f92020-11-24T21:19:08ZengSpringerOpenApplied Network Science2364-82282017-06-012112010.1007/s41109-017-0036-1JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphsLisette Espín-Noboa0Florian Lemmerich1Markus Strohmaier2Philipp Singer3GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesGESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesGESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesGESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesAbstract Understanding edge formation represents a key question in network analysis. Various approaches have been postulated across disciplines ranging from network growth models to statistical (regression) methods. In this work, we extend this existing arsenal of methods with JANUS, a hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach that allows to intuitively compare hypotheses about edge formation in multigraphs. We model the multiplicity of edges using a simple categorical model and propose to express hypotheses as priors encoding our belief about parameters. Using Bayesian model comparison techniques, we compare the relative plausibility of hypotheses which might be motivated by previous theories about edge formation based on popularity or similarity. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on synthetic and empirical data. JANUS is relevant for researchers interested in studying mechanisms explaining edge formation in networks from both empirical and methodological perspectives.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-017-0036-1Edge formationBayesian inferenceAttributed multigraphsMultiplexHypTrails
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisette Espín-Noboa
Florian Lemmerich
Markus Strohmaier
Philipp Singer
spellingShingle Lisette Espín-Noboa
Florian Lemmerich
Markus Strohmaier
Philipp Singer
JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
Applied Network Science
Edge formation
Bayesian inference
Attributed multigraphs
Multiplex
HypTrails
author_facet Lisette Espín-Noboa
Florian Lemmerich
Markus Strohmaier
Philipp Singer
author_sort Lisette Espín-Noboa
title JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
title_short JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
title_full JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
title_fullStr JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
title_full_unstemmed JANUS: A hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
title_sort janus: a hypothesis-driven bayesian approach for understanding edge formation in attributed multigraphs
publisher SpringerOpen
series Applied Network Science
issn 2364-8228
publishDate 2017-06-01
description Abstract Understanding edge formation represents a key question in network analysis. Various approaches have been postulated across disciplines ranging from network growth models to statistical (regression) methods. In this work, we extend this existing arsenal of methods with JANUS, a hypothesis-driven Bayesian approach that allows to intuitively compare hypotheses about edge formation in multigraphs. We model the multiplicity of edges using a simple categorical model and propose to express hypotheses as priors encoding our belief about parameters. Using Bayesian model comparison techniques, we compare the relative plausibility of hypotheses which might be motivated by previous theories about edge formation based on popularity or similarity. We demonstrate the utility of our approach on synthetic and empirical data. JANUS is relevant for researchers interested in studying mechanisms explaining edge formation in networks from both empirical and methodological perspectives.
topic Edge formation
Bayesian inference
Attributed multigraphs
Multiplex
HypTrails
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41109-017-0036-1
work_keys_str_mv AT lisetteespinnoboa janusahypothesisdrivenbayesianapproachforunderstandingedgeformationinattributedmultigraphs
AT florianlemmerich janusahypothesisdrivenbayesianapproachforunderstandingedgeformationinattributedmultigraphs
AT markusstrohmaier janusahypothesisdrivenbayesianapproachforunderstandingedgeformationinattributedmultigraphs
AT philippsinger janusahypothesisdrivenbayesianapproachforunderstandingedgeformationinattributedmultigraphs
_version_ 1726006795020795904