Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism

The 2017 U.S. Senate Special Election in Alabama, which was decided on 12 December 2017, was one of the most contentious and scandal-laden political campaigns in recent memory. The Republican candidate, Roy Moore, gained notoriety during the 2017 campaign when a number of women alleged to national m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franklin G. Mixon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-09-01
Series:Economies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/6/3/48
id doaj-53ecd2274ef5447e9ed35e0befae9b87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-53ecd2274ef5447e9ed35e0befae9b872020-11-25T00:41:53ZengMDPI AGEconomies2227-70992018-09-01634810.3390/economies6030048economies6030048Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on LocalismFranklin G. Mixon0Center for Economic Education, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907, USAThe 2017 U.S. Senate Special Election in Alabama, which was decided on 12 December 2017, was one of the most contentious and scandal-laden political campaigns in recent memory. The Republican candidate, Roy Moore, gained notoriety during the 2017 campaign when a number of women alleged to national media that as teenagers they were subject to sexual advances by Moore, who was then in his early 30s and serving as a local assistant district attorney. The process and results of this particular election provide the heretofore unexamined impact of political scandal on localism or friends-and-neighbors voting in political contests. Based on data from the 2017 special election in Alabama, econometric results presented here suggest that a candidate who is embroiled in political scandal suffers an erosion in the usual friends-and-neighbors effect on his or her local vote share. In this particular case, the scandal hanging over Moore eroded all of the friends-and-neighbors effect that would have been expected (e.g., about five percentage points) in his home county, as well as about 40% of the advantage Moore had at home over his opponent in terms of constituent political ideology.http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/6/3/48friends-and-neighbors votinglocalism in electionsreputation capitalpolitical scandal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Franklin G. Mixon
spellingShingle Franklin G. Mixon
Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
Economies
friends-and-neighbors voting
localism in elections
reputation capital
political scandal
author_facet Franklin G. Mixon
author_sort Franklin G. Mixon
title Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
title_short Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
title_full Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
title_fullStr Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
title_full_unstemmed Glass Houses and Friends-and-Neighbors Voting: An Exploratory Analysis of the Impact of Political Scandal on Localism
title_sort glass houses and friends-and-neighbors voting: an exploratory analysis of the impact of political scandal on localism
publisher MDPI AG
series Economies
issn 2227-7099
publishDate 2018-09-01
description The 2017 U.S. Senate Special Election in Alabama, which was decided on 12 December 2017, was one of the most contentious and scandal-laden political campaigns in recent memory. The Republican candidate, Roy Moore, gained notoriety during the 2017 campaign when a number of women alleged to national media that as teenagers they were subject to sexual advances by Moore, who was then in his early 30s and serving as a local assistant district attorney. The process and results of this particular election provide the heretofore unexamined impact of political scandal on localism or friends-and-neighbors voting in political contests. Based on data from the 2017 special election in Alabama, econometric results presented here suggest that a candidate who is embroiled in political scandal suffers an erosion in the usual friends-and-neighbors effect on his or her local vote share. In this particular case, the scandal hanging over Moore eroded all of the friends-and-neighbors effect that would have been expected (e.g., about five percentage points) in his home county, as well as about 40% of the advantage Moore had at home over his opponent in terms of constituent political ideology.
topic friends-and-neighbors voting
localism in elections
reputation capital
political scandal
url http://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/6/3/48
work_keys_str_mv AT franklingmixon glasshousesandfriendsandneighborsvotinganexploratoryanalysisoftheimpactofpoliticalscandalonlocalism
_version_ 1725285097232400384