Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients

Objective: Many emergency department (ED) patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms such as chest pain or dyspnea are placed in observation units but do not undergo specific diagnostic testing for pulmonary embolism (PE). The role of observation units in the diagnosis of PE has not been studied. We hyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cairns, Charles B, Glickman, Seth W, Limkakeng, Alexander T, Chandra, Abhinav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2009-08-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g09t6v4
id doaj-5414e3675ffc4d61962cbde68946aa04
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5414e3675ffc4d61962cbde68946aa042020-11-24T21:26:10ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-900X1936-90182009-08-01103130134Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit PatientsCairns, Charles BGlickman, Seth WLimkakeng, Alexander TChandra, AbhinavObjective: Many emergency department (ED) patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms such as chest pain or dyspnea are placed in observation units but do not undergo specific diagnostic testing for pulmonary embolism (PE). The role of observation units in the diagnosis of PE has not been studied. We hypothesized that there was a small but significant rate of unsuspected PE in our observation unit population.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at an urban academic hospital of all ED patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of PE between January 2005 and July 2006. The number of such patients assigned to observation at any point in their stay was recorded, in addition to events leading to diagnosis and subsequent in-hospital outcomes.Results: Thirteen of the 190 ED patients diagnosed with PE were placed in the observation unit. Six of these either had a known recent diagnosis of PE or had testing for PE initiated prior to placement in the observation unit. Two of the remaining seven patients with undiagnosed PE were placed in observation for undifferentiated chest pain, accounting for 0.09% of the 2190 patients under the chest pain protocol. Twelve of 13 PE patients (92%) were admitted with an average stay of 4.3 days. Of the 13 patients, five were ultimately determined after admission to not have PE, leaving a rate of confirmed PE in the observation unit population of 0.12% (8/6182), with five of eight being classified as unsuspected prior to assignment to observation (0.08% rate).Conclusion: We identified a small number of patients assigned to observation with unsuspected PE. The high rate of hospital admission and prolonged hospital stay suggests that patients with PE are inappropriate for observation status. Given the low incidence of unsuspected PE, there may be a need for a specific approach to screening for PE in observation unit patients.[WestJEM. 2009;10:130-134.]http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g09t6v4observation unitpulmonary embolismchest paindyspnea
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cairns, Charles B
Glickman, Seth W
Limkakeng, Alexander T
Chandra, Abhinav
spellingShingle Cairns, Charles B
Glickman, Seth W
Limkakeng, Alexander T
Chandra, Abhinav
Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
observation unit
pulmonary embolism
chest pain
dyspnea
author_facet Cairns, Charles B
Glickman, Seth W
Limkakeng, Alexander T
Chandra, Abhinav
author_sort Cairns, Charles B
title Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
title_short Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
title_full Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
title_fullStr Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
title_full_unstemmed Unsuspected Pulmonary Embolism in Observation Unit Patients
title_sort unsuspected pulmonary embolism in observation unit patients
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
issn 1936-900X
1936-9018
publishDate 2009-08-01
description Objective: Many emergency department (ED) patients with cardiopulmonary symptoms such as chest pain or dyspnea are placed in observation units but do not undergo specific diagnostic testing for pulmonary embolism (PE). The role of observation units in the diagnosis of PE has not been studied. We hypothesized that there was a small but significant rate of unsuspected PE in our observation unit population.Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at an urban academic hospital of all ED patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis of PE between January 2005 and July 2006. The number of such patients assigned to observation at any point in their stay was recorded, in addition to events leading to diagnosis and subsequent in-hospital outcomes.Results: Thirteen of the 190 ED patients diagnosed with PE were placed in the observation unit. Six of these either had a known recent diagnosis of PE or had testing for PE initiated prior to placement in the observation unit. Two of the remaining seven patients with undiagnosed PE were placed in observation for undifferentiated chest pain, accounting for 0.09% of the 2190 patients under the chest pain protocol. Twelve of 13 PE patients (92%) were admitted with an average stay of 4.3 days. Of the 13 patients, five were ultimately determined after admission to not have PE, leaving a rate of confirmed PE in the observation unit population of 0.12% (8/6182), with five of eight being classified as unsuspected prior to assignment to observation (0.08% rate).Conclusion: We identified a small number of patients assigned to observation with unsuspected PE. The high rate of hospital admission and prolonged hospital stay suggests that patients with PE are inappropriate for observation status. Given the low incidence of unsuspected PE, there may be a need for a specific approach to screening for PE in observation unit patients.[WestJEM. 2009;10:130-134.]
topic observation unit
pulmonary embolism
chest pain
dyspnea
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1g09t6v4
work_keys_str_mv AT cairnscharlesb unsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminobservationunitpatients
AT glickmansethw unsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminobservationunitpatients
AT limkakengalexandert unsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminobservationunitpatients
AT chandraabhinav unsuspectedpulmonaryembolisminobservationunitpatients
_version_ 1725980527691825152