Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population

• Main Authors: Hyo Jin Kim, Sun Mi Kim, Bohyoung Kim, Bo La Yun, Mijung Jang, Yousun Ko, Soo Hyun Lee, Heeyeong Jeong, Jung Min Chang, Nariya Cho
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Nature Publishing Group 2018-04-01
• Series: Scientific Reports
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24377-0

Abstract We investigated addition of strain and shear wave elastography to conventional ultrasonography for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score for differentiating between benign and malignant masses. In all, 108 masses from 94 patients were evaluated with strain and shear wave elastography and scored for suspicion of malignancy, visual score, strain ratio, and elasticity ratio. The diagnostic performance between ultrasonography alone and ultrasonography combined with either type of elastography was compared; cut-off points were determined for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual score. Of the 108 masses, 44 were malignant and 64 were benign. The areas under the curves were significantly higher for strain and shear wave elastography-supplemented ultrasonography (0.839 and 0.826, respectively; P = 0.656) than for ultrasonography alone (0.764; P = 0.018 and 0.035, respectively). The diagnostic performances of strain and elasticity ratios were similar when differentiating benign from malignant masses. Cut-off values for strain ratio, elasticity ratio, and visual scores for strain and shear wave elastography were 2.93, 4, 3, and 2, respectively. Both forms of elastography similarly improved the diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasonography in the qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses.