Darsi codici etici in antropologia

Through review of selected anthropological ethical codes an attempt is made to outline the fundamental ethical principles of anthropological research and their applicability to current practices of applied anthropology. The Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics was adopted by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Marco Bassi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CLUEB 2017-05-01
Series:Antropologia Pubblica
Online Access:https://riviste-clueb.online/index.php/anpub/article/view/81
id doaj-5464129aac1946fe8da7b13911e46670
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5464129aac1946fe8da7b13911e466702020-11-25T01:20:05ZengCLUEBAntropologia Pubblica2531-87992017-05-012215917210.1473/anpub.v2i2.8181Darsi codici etici in antropologiaMarco Bassi0Università degli Studi di TrentoThrough review of selected anthropological ethical codes an attempt is made to outline the fundamental ethical principles of anthropological research and their applicability to current practices of applied anthropology. The Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics was adopted by the American Anthropological Association in response to the need to take distance from military research after the Camelot scandal. Anthropology reacted stronger than other disciplines due to its methodology implying a relation of trust with the community. The Codice etico of AISEA defines the anthropologist’s obligations with different type of actors. In applied anthropology more attention should be paid to the relation with the financers of the research, due to possible conflict of interest between the latter and the concerned community. During consultancies anthropologists are today often forced into conditions that do not allow them to fulfil the obligations as stated in most deontological codes. Yet, giving up would cut the anthropologist out of the ongoing processes that have often a potential critical impact on the communities. The Codes of Ethics of ISE has allowed overcoming serious controversies by referring to procedural rights according to international law. It is suggested that reference to procedural and collective rights, appropriate international standards and best practices can provide an appropriate device to evaluate case by case the opportunity to engage, considering the overall field of relations rather that strictly focusing on the anthologist’s obligations which each actor independently.https://riviste-clueb.online/index.php/anpub/article/view/81
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Bassi
spellingShingle Marco Bassi
Darsi codici etici in antropologia
Antropologia Pubblica
author_facet Marco Bassi
author_sort Marco Bassi
title Darsi codici etici in antropologia
title_short Darsi codici etici in antropologia
title_full Darsi codici etici in antropologia
title_fullStr Darsi codici etici in antropologia
title_full_unstemmed Darsi codici etici in antropologia
title_sort darsi codici etici in antropologia
publisher CLUEB
series Antropologia Pubblica
issn 2531-8799
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Through review of selected anthropological ethical codes an attempt is made to outline the fundamental ethical principles of anthropological research and their applicability to current practices of applied anthropology. The Statement on Problems of Anthropological Research and Ethics was adopted by the American Anthropological Association in response to the need to take distance from military research after the Camelot scandal. Anthropology reacted stronger than other disciplines due to its methodology implying a relation of trust with the community. The Codice etico of AISEA defines the anthropologist’s obligations with different type of actors. In applied anthropology more attention should be paid to the relation with the financers of the research, due to possible conflict of interest between the latter and the concerned community. During consultancies anthropologists are today often forced into conditions that do not allow them to fulfil the obligations as stated in most deontological codes. Yet, giving up would cut the anthropologist out of the ongoing processes that have often a potential critical impact on the communities. The Codes of Ethics of ISE has allowed overcoming serious controversies by referring to procedural rights according to international law. It is suggested that reference to procedural and collective rights, appropriate international standards and best practices can provide an appropriate device to evaluate case by case the opportunity to engage, considering the overall field of relations rather that strictly focusing on the anthologist’s obligations which each actor independently.
url https://riviste-clueb.online/index.php/anpub/article/view/81
work_keys_str_mv AT marcobassi darsicodicieticiinantropologia
_version_ 1725135603059654656