Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional surgical techniques. The purpose of this review is to document the current state of research and identify future research directions. At present, no specific markers have been shown to specifically identify MSCs. Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Eiki Yamachika, Seiji Iida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-02-01
Series:Japanese Dental Science Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761612000658
id doaj-547e7bdf52bb4fed8139d3d8e925a0ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-547e7bdf52bb4fed8139d3d8e925a0ba2020-11-24T22:57:05ZengElsevierJapanese Dental Science Review1882-76162013-02-01491354410.1016/j.jdsr.2012.11.003Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal modelEiki Yamachika0Seiji Iida1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama city 700-8558, JapanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Reconstructive Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Densitry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama city 700-8558, JapanMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional surgical techniques. The purpose of this review is to document the current state of research and identify future research directions. At present, no specific markers have been shown to specifically identify MSCs. The most commonly reported positive markers are CD105, CD90, CD44, CD73, CD29, CD13, CD34, CD146, CD106, CD54 and CD166. The most frequently reported negative markers are CD34, CD14, CD45, CD11b, CD49d, CD106, CD10 and CD31. Regarding the source of MSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs are the most frequently studied MSCs in bone regeneration; however, no reports have demonstrated advantages of bone marrow-derived MSCs over other types of MSCs in bone regeneration. For the purpose of clinical use, serum-free media is recommended to avoid risks connected with the use of animal products. Attempts have been made to develop defined serum-free media for animal and human MSC growth; however, most products have demonstrated only limited performance. Tumorigenesis is the other major problem in MSC regeneration. It is strongly recommended to prepare MSCs for tissue regeneration at early passages to avoid potential chromosomal abnormalities.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761612000658Bone regenerationMesenchymal stem cells
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Eiki Yamachika
Seiji Iida
spellingShingle Eiki Yamachika
Seiji Iida
Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
Japanese Dental Science Review
Bone regeneration
Mesenchymal stem cells
author_facet Eiki Yamachika
Seiji Iida
author_sort Eiki Yamachika
title Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
title_short Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
title_full Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
title_fullStr Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
title_full_unstemmed Bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and compact bone-derived MSCs as an animal model
title_sort bone regeneration from mesenchymal stem cells (mscs) and compact bone-derived mscs as an animal model
publisher Elsevier
series Japanese Dental Science Review
issn 1882-7616
publishDate 2013-02-01
description Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional surgical techniques. The purpose of this review is to document the current state of research and identify future research directions. At present, no specific markers have been shown to specifically identify MSCs. The most commonly reported positive markers are CD105, CD90, CD44, CD73, CD29, CD13, CD34, CD146, CD106, CD54 and CD166. The most frequently reported negative markers are CD34, CD14, CD45, CD11b, CD49d, CD106, CD10 and CD31. Regarding the source of MSCs, bone marrow-derived MSCs are the most frequently studied MSCs in bone regeneration; however, no reports have demonstrated advantages of bone marrow-derived MSCs over other types of MSCs in bone regeneration. For the purpose of clinical use, serum-free media is recommended to avoid risks connected with the use of animal products. Attempts have been made to develop defined serum-free media for animal and human MSC growth; however, most products have demonstrated only limited performance. Tumorigenesis is the other major problem in MSC regeneration. It is strongly recommended to prepare MSCs for tissue regeneration at early passages to avoid potential chromosomal abnormalities.
topic Bone regeneration
Mesenchymal stem cells
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1882761612000658
work_keys_str_mv AT eikiyamachika boneregenerationfrommesenchymalstemcellsmscsandcompactbonederivedmscsasananimalmodel
AT seijiiida boneregenerationfrommesenchymalstemcellsmscsandcompactbonederivedmscsasananimalmodel
_version_ 1725652082378145792