Comparison of reliability techniques of parametric and non-parametric method

Reliability of a product or system is the probability that the product performs adequately its intended function for the stated period of time under stated operating conditions. It is function of time. The most widely used nano ceramic capacitor C0G and X7R is used in this reliability study to gener...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Kalaiselvan, L. Bhaskara Rao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2016-06-01
Series:Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215098615001640
Description
Summary:Reliability of a product or system is the probability that the product performs adequately its intended function for the stated period of time under stated operating conditions. It is function of time. The most widely used nano ceramic capacitor C0G and X7R is used in this reliability study to generate the Time-to failure (TTF) data. The time to failure data are identified by Accelerated Life Test (ALT) and Highly Accelerated Life Testing (HALT). The test is conducted at high stress level to generate more failure rate within the short interval of time. The reliability method used to convert accelerated to actual condition is Parametric method and Non-Parametric method. In this paper, comparative study has been done for Parametric and Non-Parametric methods to identify the failure data. The Weibull distribution is identified for parametric method; Kaplan–Meier and Simple Actuarial Method are identified for non-parametric method. The time taken to identify the mean time to failure (MTTF) in accelerating condition is the same for parametric and non-parametric method with relative deviation.
ISSN:2215-0986