The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery

Background: Etomidate and ketamine are commonly used to induce sedation in cataract surgery due to their favorable hemodynamic side-effect profile. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate/fentanyl with ketamine/midazolam combinations for inducing sedation in cataract...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Omid Aghadavoudi, Parastou Balaei, Mojtaba Akbari
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Vesnu Publications 2012-12-01
Series:مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
Online Access:http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2288
id doaj-5497f1d0db7c42d9b8cfa303a529419e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5497f1d0db7c42d9b8cfa303a529419e2020-11-25T00:02:42ZfasVesnu Publications مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان1027-75951735-854X2012-12-0130209163116381170The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract SurgeryOmid Aghadavoudi0Parastou Balaei1Mojtaba Akbari2Associate Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranStudent of Medicine, School of Medicine AND Student Research Committee, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranEpidemiologist, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IranBackground: Etomidate and ketamine are commonly used to induce sedation in cataract surgery due to their favorable hemodynamic side-effect profile. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate/fentanyl with ketamine/midazolam combinations for inducing sedation in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique. Methods: This study was a double-blind active-control clinical trial. 94 patients scheduled for cataract surgery under sedation, were randomly assigned to receive either etomidate/fentanyl or ketamine/midazolam. Participants’ blood pressure, heart rate, nausea and vomiting frequency, decreased arterial O2 saturation episodes, and recovery duration as well as the patients and surgeon satisfaction were recorded during the study period. Findings: No statistically significant differences were observed in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate between groups. Mean systolic blood pressure was 148.5 ± 25.1 in etomidate/fentanyl and 149.3 ± 22.0 in ketamin/midazolam groups (P = 0.87). Similarly, the patients of both groups reported the same levels of pain and nausea, but not vomiting episodes which have only happened in etomidate/fentanyl group. In contrast, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in ketamine/midazolam group (P = 0.001), although surgeon satisfaction were comparable with both combinations (P = 0.07). The members of both groups reached a desired level of sedation in 30 minutes and the between-group differences of sedation scores remained non-significant. However, myoclonus was only experienced by the etomidate/fentanyl group patients. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated that the combination of etomidate/fentanyl is as efficient and safe as ketamine/midazolam in cataract surgery, without any significant side effects. Keywords: Cataract extraction, Conscious sedation, Etomidate, Midazolam, Ketaminehttp://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2288
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Omid Aghadavoudi
Parastou Balaei
Mojtaba Akbari
spellingShingle Omid Aghadavoudi
Parastou Balaei
Mojtaba Akbari
The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
author_facet Omid Aghadavoudi
Parastou Balaei
Mojtaba Akbari
author_sort Omid Aghadavoudi
title The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
title_short The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
title_full The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
title_fullStr The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
title_full_unstemmed The Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Sedation with Etomidate-Fentanyl versus Ketamine-Midazolam Combinations in Cataract Surgery
title_sort comparison of the efficacy and safety of sedation with etomidate-fentanyl versus ketamine-midazolam combinations in cataract surgery
publisher Vesnu Publications
series مجله دانشکده پزشکی اصفهان
issn 1027-7595
1735-854X
publishDate 2012-12-01
description Background: Etomidate and ketamine are commonly used to induce sedation in cataract surgery due to their favorable hemodynamic side-effect profile. This study was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of etomidate/fentanyl with ketamine/midazolam combinations for inducing sedation in cataract surgery with phacoemulsification technique. Methods: This study was a double-blind active-control clinical trial. 94 patients scheduled for cataract surgery under sedation, were randomly assigned to receive either etomidate/fentanyl or ketamine/midazolam. Participants’ blood pressure, heart rate, nausea and vomiting frequency, decreased arterial O2 saturation episodes, and recovery duration as well as the patients and surgeon satisfaction were recorded during the study period. Findings: No statistically significant differences were observed in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate between groups. Mean systolic blood pressure was 148.5 ± 25.1 in etomidate/fentanyl and 149.3 ± 22.0 in ketamin/midazolam groups (P = 0.87). Similarly, the patients of both groups reported the same levels of pain and nausea, but not vomiting episodes which have only happened in etomidate/fentanyl group. In contrast, patient satisfaction was significantly higher in ketamine/midazolam group (P = 0.001), although surgeon satisfaction were comparable with both combinations (P = 0.07). The members of both groups reached a desired level of sedation in 30 minutes and the between-group differences of sedation scores remained non-significant. However, myoclonus was only experienced by the etomidate/fentanyl group patients. Conclusion: Overall, this study demonstrated that the combination of etomidate/fentanyl is as efficient and safe as ketamine/midazolam in cataract surgery, without any significant side effects. Keywords: Cataract extraction, Conscious sedation, Etomidate, Midazolam, Ketamine
url http://jims.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jims/article/view/2288
work_keys_str_mv AT omidaghadavoudi thecomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
AT parastoubalaei thecomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
AT mojtabaakbari thecomparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
AT omidaghadavoudi comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
AT parastoubalaei comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
AT mojtabaakbari comparisonoftheefficacyandsafetyofsedationwithetomidatefentanylversusketaminemidazolamcombinationsincataractsurgery
_version_ 1725437120321945600