Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy

Abstract Background The assessment of liver percentage fat fraction (%FF) using proton density fat fraction sequences is becoming increasingly accessible. Previous studies have tended to use multiple small ROIs that focus on Couinaud segments. In an effort to simplify day-to-day analysis, this study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander J. Procter, Julia Y. Sun, Paul N. Malcolm, Andoni P. Toms
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-02-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
ROI
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0311-y
id doaj-54991dc7e75e4964b9121e43936ed6b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54991dc7e75e4964b9121e43936ed6b92020-11-25T03:20:13ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422019-02-011911910.1186/s12880-019-0311-yMeasuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracyAlexander J. Procter0Julia Y. Sun1Paul N. Malcolm2Andoni P. Toms3Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustNorfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Foundation TrustAbstract Background The assessment of liver percentage fat fraction (%FF) using proton density fat fraction sequences is becoming increasingly accessible. Previous studies have tended to use multiple small ROIs that focus on Couinaud segments. In an effort to simplify day-to-day analysis, this study assesses the impact of using larger, elliptical ROIs focused on a single hepatic lobe. Additionally, we assess the impact of sampling fewer transhepatic slices when measuring %FF. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained images from 34 volunteers using an IDEAL IQ sequence. Two observers independently measured %FF using three different protocols: freehand whole-liver ROI (fh-ROI), elliptical-ROI on the right lobe (rt-ROI) and elliptical-ROI on the left lobe (lt-ROI). Results Inter-observer reliability for all measurements techniques was ‘excellent’ (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients 0.81–0.98). There was a significant difference (Paired Wilcoxon Test: p < 0.001) between the median %FF obtained using fh-ROI when compared to the rt-ROI method, the maximum mean difference between the two techniques was 2.79% (95% CI). For all sampling methods a Kruskall-Wallis analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean %FF when the number of slices sampled was reduced from 11 to 1. The mean coefficient of variance increased when more slices were sampled (3 slices = 0.1, 11 slices = 0.17, p < 0.001). Conclusion Simplified ROIs focused on one hepatic lobe provide %FF measurements that are unlikely to be sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice. Freehand whole-liver ROIs should be used in preference. A single freehand ROI measurement taken at the level of the hepatic hilum yields a %FF that is representative of the mean whole liver % FF. Multiple slices are needed to measure heterogeneity.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0311-yROILiverPDFF
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alexander J. Procter
Julia Y. Sun
Paul N. Malcolm
Andoni P. Toms
spellingShingle Alexander J. Procter
Julia Y. Sun
Paul N. Malcolm
Andoni P. Toms
Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
BMC Medical Imaging
ROI
Liver
PDFF
author_facet Alexander J. Procter
Julia Y. Sun
Paul N. Malcolm
Andoni P. Toms
author_sort Alexander J. Procter
title Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
title_short Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
title_full Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
title_fullStr Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
title_full_unstemmed Measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift MRI: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
title_sort measuring liver fat fraction with complex-based chemical shift mri: the effect of simplified sampling protocols on accuracy
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Imaging
issn 1471-2342
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract Background The assessment of liver percentage fat fraction (%FF) using proton density fat fraction sequences is becoming increasingly accessible. Previous studies have tended to use multiple small ROIs that focus on Couinaud segments. In an effort to simplify day-to-day analysis, this study assesses the impact of using larger, elliptical ROIs focused on a single hepatic lobe. Additionally, we assess the impact of sampling fewer transhepatic slices when measuring %FF. Methods Retrospective analysis of prospectively obtained images from 34 volunteers using an IDEAL IQ sequence. Two observers independently measured %FF using three different protocols: freehand whole-liver ROI (fh-ROI), elliptical-ROI on the right lobe (rt-ROI) and elliptical-ROI on the left lobe (lt-ROI). Results Inter-observer reliability for all measurements techniques was ‘excellent’ (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients 0.81–0.98). There was a significant difference (Paired Wilcoxon Test: p < 0.001) between the median %FF obtained using fh-ROI when compared to the rt-ROI method, the maximum mean difference between the two techniques was 2.79% (95% CI). For all sampling methods a Kruskall-Wallis analysis demonstrated no significant difference in mean %FF when the number of slices sampled was reduced from 11 to 1. The mean coefficient of variance increased when more slices were sampled (3 slices = 0.1, 11 slices = 0.17, p < 0.001). Conclusion Simplified ROIs focused on one hepatic lobe provide %FF measurements that are unlikely to be sufficiently accurate for use in clinical practice. Freehand whole-liver ROIs should be used in preference. A single freehand ROI measurement taken at the level of the hepatic hilum yields a %FF that is representative of the mean whole liver % FF. Multiple slices are needed to measure heterogeneity.
topic ROI
Liver
PDFF
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12880-019-0311-y
work_keys_str_mv AT alexanderjprocter measuringliverfatfractionwithcomplexbasedchemicalshiftmritheeffectofsimplifiedsamplingprotocolsonaccuracy
AT juliaysun measuringliverfatfractionwithcomplexbasedchemicalshiftmritheeffectofsimplifiedsamplingprotocolsonaccuracy
AT paulnmalcolm measuringliverfatfractionwithcomplexbasedchemicalshiftmritheeffectofsimplifiedsamplingprotocolsonaccuracy
AT andoniptoms measuringliverfatfractionwithcomplexbasedchemicalshiftmritheeffectofsimplifiedsamplingprotocolsonaccuracy
_version_ 1724618675913228288