Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.

There is a discrepancy between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines (7th edition) and the Japanese treatment guidelines (3rd edition) with regard to the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. In the AJCC, hepatic artery station (No.12a) lymph node (LN) metastasis is cla...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cai Shirong, Chen Jianhui, Chen Chuangqi, Wu Kaiming, Zhang Xinhua, Song Wu, He Yulong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4358929?pdf=render
id doaj-54b71e3406034c12a228fa4e34d6cb14
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54b71e3406034c12a228fa4e34d6cb142020-11-25T01:33:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01103e011895310.1371/journal.pone.0118953Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.Cai ShirongChen JianhuiChen ChuangqiWu KaimingZhang XinhuaSong WuHe YulongThere is a discrepancy between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines (7th edition) and the Japanese treatment guidelines (3rd edition) with regard to the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. In the AJCC, hepatic artery station (No.12a) lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as distant metastasis, whereas in the Japanese guidelines, this classified is regional metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate whether it is appropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis in consideration of survival outcome.In this retrospective analysis, data from patients with gastric cancer who underwent regular D2 or greater lymphadenectomy between 1996 and 2006 were evaluated to determine any association between the clinicopathological features of hepatic artery LNs and survival prognosis.Among the 247 patients with gastric cancer who underwent No.12 LN harvest, 45 (18.2%) were positive for No.12a LN metastasis. No.12a LN metastasis was significantly associated with poor clinicopathological features, advanced tumor stage, and poor overall survival. The 5-year survival rate of patients with No.12a LN metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but was similar to that of patients with LN involvement in the D2 lymphadenectomy region (P > 0.05). No.12a LN metastasis was shown to significantly influence survival outcome in univariate analysis, but was not identified as a significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. In logistic multivariate regression analysis, T stage, N stage, and station No.3, 5, and 6 LN metastasis were independent predictors of No.12a LN involvement.It is inappropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis. We propose that this be considered as regional metastasis and be included in the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy to improve survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4358929?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cai Shirong
Chen Jianhui
Chen Chuangqi
Wu Kaiming
Zhang Xinhua
Song Wu
He Yulong
spellingShingle Cai Shirong
Chen Jianhui
Chen Chuangqi
Wu Kaiming
Zhang Xinhua
Song Wu
He Yulong
Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Cai Shirong
Chen Jianhui
Chen Chuangqi
Wu Kaiming
Zhang Xinhua
Song Wu
He Yulong
author_sort Cai Shirong
title Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
title_short Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
title_full Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
title_fullStr Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
title_full_unstemmed Survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for D2 lymphadenectomy.
title_sort survival of proper hepatic artery lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer: implications for d2 lymphadenectomy.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2015-01-01
description There is a discrepancy between the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines (7th edition) and the Japanese treatment guidelines (3rd edition) with regard to the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. In the AJCC, hepatic artery station (No.12a) lymph node (LN) metastasis is classified as distant metastasis, whereas in the Japanese guidelines, this classified is regional metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate whether it is appropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis in consideration of survival outcome.In this retrospective analysis, data from patients with gastric cancer who underwent regular D2 or greater lymphadenectomy between 1996 and 2006 were evaluated to determine any association between the clinicopathological features of hepatic artery LNs and survival prognosis.Among the 247 patients with gastric cancer who underwent No.12 LN harvest, 45 (18.2%) were positive for No.12a LN metastasis. No.12a LN metastasis was significantly associated with poor clinicopathological features, advanced tumor stage, and poor overall survival. The 5-year survival rate of patients with No.12a LN metastasis was significantly better than that of patients with distant metastasis (P < 0.05), but was similar to that of patients with LN involvement in the D2 lymphadenectomy region (P > 0.05). No.12a LN metastasis was shown to significantly influence survival outcome in univariate analysis, but was not identified as a significant independent predictor in multivariate analysis. In logistic multivariate regression analysis, T stage, N stage, and station No.3, 5, and 6 LN metastasis were independent predictors of No.12a LN involvement.It is inappropriate to reclassify No.12a LN metastasis as distant metastasis. We propose that this be considered as regional metastasis and be included in the extent of D2 lymphadenectomy to improve survival outcomes in patients with gastric cancer.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4358929?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT caishirong survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT chenjianhui survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT chenchuangqi survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT wukaiming survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT zhangxinhua survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT songwu survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
AT heyulong survivalofproperhepaticarterylymphnodemetastasisinpatientswithgastriccancerimplicationsford2lymphadenectomy
_version_ 1725077796251762688