Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) trans venous lead extraction (TLE) is technically challenging. Whether the use of a laser sheath reduces complications and improves outcomes is still in debate. We therefore aimed at comparing our experience with and witho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arwa Younis, Michael Glikson, Amit Meitus, Noga Arwas, Sharon Shalom Natanzon, Dor Lotan, David Luria, Roy Beinart, Eyal Nof
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215589
id doaj-54b86011fbd642d0bafb200e95c7b731
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54b86011fbd642d0bafb200e95c7b7312021-03-04T10:32:13ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01144e021558910.1371/journal.pone.0215589Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.Arwa YounisMichael GliksonAmit MeitusNoga ArwasSharon Shalom NatanzonDor LotanDavid LuriaRoy BeinartEyal Nof<h4>Introduction</h4>Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) trans venous lead extraction (TLE) is technically challenging. Whether the use of a laser sheath reduces complications and improves outcomes is still in debate. We therefore aimed at comparing our experience with and without laser in a large referral center.<h4>Methods</h4>Information of all patients undergoing TLE was collected prospectively. We retrospectively compared procedural outcomes prior to the introduction of the laser sheath lead extraction technique to use of laser sheath.<h4>Results</h4>During the years 2007-2017, there were 850 attempted lead removals in 407 pts. Of them, 339 (83%) were extracted due to infection, device upgrade/lead malfunction in 42 (10%) cases, and other (7%). Complete removal (radiological success) of all leads was achieved in (88%). Partial removal was achieved in another 6% of the patients. Comparison of cases prior to and after laser technique introduction, showed that with laser, a significantly smaller proportion of cases required conversion to femoral approach [31/275 (6%) laser vs. 40/132 (15%) non-laser; p<0.001]. However, success rates of removal [259/275 (94%) vs. 124/132 (94%) respectively; p = 0.83] and total complication rates [35 (13%) vs. 19 (14%) respectively; p = 0.86] did not differ prior to and after laser use. In multivariate analysis, laser-assisted extraction was an independent predictor for no need for femoral extraction (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.69; p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Introduction of laser lead removal resulted in decreased need to convert to femoral approach, albeit without improving success rates or preventing major complications.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215589
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Arwa Younis
Michael Glikson
Amit Meitus
Noga Arwas
Sharon Shalom Natanzon
Dor Lotan
David Luria
Roy Beinart
Eyal Nof
spellingShingle Arwa Younis
Michael Glikson
Amit Meitus
Noga Arwas
Sharon Shalom Natanzon
Dor Lotan
David Luria
Roy Beinart
Eyal Nof
Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Arwa Younis
Michael Glikson
Amit Meitus
Noga Arwas
Sharon Shalom Natanzon
Dor Lotan
David Luria
Roy Beinart
Eyal Nof
author_sort Arwa Younis
title Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
title_short Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
title_full Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
title_fullStr Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
title_full_unstemmed Transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
title_sort transvenous lead extraction with laser reduces need for femoral approach during the procedure.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) trans venous lead extraction (TLE) is technically challenging. Whether the use of a laser sheath reduces complications and improves outcomes is still in debate. We therefore aimed at comparing our experience with and without laser in a large referral center.<h4>Methods</h4>Information of all patients undergoing TLE was collected prospectively. We retrospectively compared procedural outcomes prior to the introduction of the laser sheath lead extraction technique to use of laser sheath.<h4>Results</h4>During the years 2007-2017, there were 850 attempted lead removals in 407 pts. Of them, 339 (83%) were extracted due to infection, device upgrade/lead malfunction in 42 (10%) cases, and other (7%). Complete removal (radiological success) of all leads was achieved in (88%). Partial removal was achieved in another 6% of the patients. Comparison of cases prior to and after laser technique introduction, showed that with laser, a significantly smaller proportion of cases required conversion to femoral approach [31/275 (6%) laser vs. 40/132 (15%) non-laser; p<0.001]. However, success rates of removal [259/275 (94%) vs. 124/132 (94%) respectively; p = 0.83] and total complication rates [35 (13%) vs. 19 (14%) respectively; p = 0.86] did not differ prior to and after laser use. In multivariate analysis, laser-assisted extraction was an independent predictor for no need for femoral extraction (OR = 0.39; 95% CI 0.23-0.69; p = 0.01).<h4>Conclusion</h4>Introduction of laser lead removal resulted in decreased need to convert to femoral approach, albeit without improving success rates or preventing major complications.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215589
work_keys_str_mv AT arwayounis transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT michaelglikson transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT amitmeitus transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT nogaarwas transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT sharonshalomnatanzon transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT dorlotan transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT davidluria transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT roybeinart transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
AT eyalnof transvenousleadextractionwithlaserreducesneedforfemoralapproachduringtheprocedure
_version_ 1714805587134382080