Fatigue resistance of ProTaper gold exposed to high-concentration sodium hypochlorite in double curvature artificial canal

Fatigue resistance of ProTaper gold exposed to high-concentration sodium hypochlorite in double curvature artificial canal

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold (PTG) and ProTaper Universal (PTU) in artificial single and double curvature canals in 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) at body temperature (37 °C). PTG and PTU files (size F1) were subjected to fatigue tests in two diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Fahda Algahtani, Xiangya Huang, Markus Haapasalo, Zhejun Wang, Ahmed Hieawy, Duo Zhang, Jolanta Aleksejuniene, Ya Shen
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2019-12-01
Series:	Bioactive Materials
Online Access:	http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452199X1930043X

Similar Items

Comparison of canal transportation in simulated curved canals prepared with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold systems
by: Emmanuel João Nogueira Leal Silva, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Effects on the incidence of dentinal microcracks in curved root canal preparation with ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold
by: LI Shuhui, et al.
Published: (2021-10-01)

The effects of autoclave sterilization on the cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and ProTaper Gold nickel-titanium instruments
by: Taha Özyürek, et al.
Published: (2017-11-01)

Influence of NiTi alloy on the root canal shaping capabilities of the ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Gold rotary instrument systems
by: Jussaro Alves DUQUE, et al.

ProTaper files in root canal preparation: Case report
by: Brkanić Tatjana
Published: (2005-01-01)

Canal Centring Ability of ProTaper and Mtwo Rotary Systems in Curved Canals
by: Turkaydin Dilek Erbay, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01)

Computed Tomography Evaluation of Canal Transportation and Volumetric Changes in Root Canal Dentin of Curved Canals Using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next Rotary System-An In-vitro Study
by: Mayuri Biccodu Shivashankar, et al.
Published: (2016-11-01)

Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography
by: Amr M Elnaghy, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Antimicrobial activity of chlorhexidine in root canals instrumented with the ProTaper Universal™ System
by: Andréa Cruz Câmara, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

Geometric and dimensional characteristics of simulated curved canals prepared with proTaper instruments
by: Renata de Castro Martins, et al.
Published: (2010-02-01)

Cyclic fatigue resistance of new and used ProTaper universal and ProTaper next nickel-titanium rotary instruments
by: Neslihan Büşra Keskin, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Apically extruded debris associated with ProTaper Next, ProTaper Gold and TruNatomy systems: An in vitro study
by: Neslihan Yılmaz Çırakoglu, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Comparative evaluation of dentin volume removal and centralization of the root canal after shaping with the ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and One-Curve instruments using micro-CT
by: Hatice Yalniz, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Wear of K3 and ProTaper files after simulated clinical use in curved canals
by: Patrícia de Almeida Rodrigues Silva e Souza, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

The efficacy of the self-adjusting file and ProTaper for removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals
by: Gisele Faria, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01)

Torsional resistance of three ProTaper rotary systems
by: Abdullah Alqedairi, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01)

Evaluation of apical deviation in root canals instrumented with K3 and ProTaper systems Avaliação do desvio apical em canais instrumentados pelos sistemas K3 e ProTaper
by: Mariana Diniz Bisi dos Santos, et al.
Published: (2006-12-01)

Comparison of debris extruded apically and working time used by ProTaper Universal rotary and ProTaper retreatment system during gutta-percha removal
by: Mary Kinue Nakamune Uezu, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Evaluation of the Apical Seal in Root Canals Prepared with Rotary ProTaper Files and Obturated by Different Methods
by: Sabah A Ismail, et al.
Published: (2011-04-01)

Comparison of the shaping ability of Twisted Files with ProTaper and RevoS nickel-titanium instruments in simulated canals
by: Cumhur Aydin, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01)

Centering Ability of ProTaper Next and WaveOne Classic in J-Shape Simulated Root Canals
by: Giuseppe Troiano, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Microscopic assessment of dentinal defects induced by ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Gold, and Hyflex electric discharge machining rotary file systems – An in vitro study
by: Takhellambam Premlata Devi, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

A comparative study on the shaping ability of K3, ProFile and ProTaper instruments in simulated curved root canals
by: Chinni Suneelkumar, et al.
Published: (2010-11-01)

In vitro evaluation of the failure of rotary instruments Mtwo® y ProTaper®
by: Sandra Bibiana Rodríguez Gutiérrez, et al.
Published: (2013-07-01)

The Effect of Autoclave Sterilization on the Fracture Resistance of ProTaper Rotary Files
by: N Roghanizad, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01)

Effect of environment on cyclic fatigue of ProTaper Next rotary files
by: Tariq S Abuhaimed
Published: (2018-01-01)

مقایسه سه سیستم چرخشی نیکل تیتانیوم Reciproc، ProTaper و ProTaper Next در زمان کار و تغییر میزان خمیدگی کانال ریشه
by: سعید مرادی, et al.
Published: (2015-06-01)

Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel–titanium files in simulated severe curved canals
by: Simone Staffoli, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

Comparison of shaping ability of ProTaper Next and 2Shape nickel–titanium files in simulated severe curved canals
by: Azizi, H., et al.
Published: (2018)

Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain after single visit endodontic treatment using ProTaper Universal and ProTaper Next rotary file systems: A randomized clinical trial
by: Neha Arora, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Torsional and Bending Properties of V Taper 2H, ProTaper NEXT, NRT, and One Shape
by: Soram Oh, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Effect of the sterilization on the cutting efficiency of ProTaper® and K3® endodontic instruments
by: Alex Niederauer Becker, et al.
Published: (2009-12-01)

Comparison of the centering ability of the ProTaper Universal, ProFile and Twisted File Rotary Systems
by: Daniela de Andrade Mendes, et al.
Published: (2015-11-01)

A Comparison of the Apical Extrusion of Debris during the Preparation of Root Canal with Medin, RaCe, and ProTaper Rotary Systems
by: Mohammadreza Nabavizadeh, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Computed tomography evaluation of root canal transportation using ProTaper, Race and Sendoline rotary systems: an ex vivo study
by: Saberi E, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

The root canal shaping ability of WaveOne and Reciproc versus ProTaper Universal and Mtwo rotary NiTi systems
by: Ahmed S Abu Haimed, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Efficacy of ProTaper Retreatment System in Root Canals Obturated with Gutta-Percha Using Two Different Sealers and GuttaFlow
by: Jaya Siotia, et al.
Published: (2011-01-01)

A Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Dentinal Cracks at Different Instrumentation Lengths by Using Different Rotary Files (ProTaper Universal, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM): An Ex Vivo Study
by: Fauzia Ashraf, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

Dentinal Microcrack Formation after Root Canal Instrumentation by XP-Endo Shaper and ProTaper Universal: A Microcomputed Tomography Evaluation
by: Sarah M. Alkahtany, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Centering ability, canal transportation and surface modifications of ProTaper F2 and F3 used in continuous rotation and reciprocating motion in curved root canals
by: Jader Vinicius Andreazza, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_le30gjvcvoipg8g33sp5klhqs7