Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates

Abstract The brain is intrinsically organized into large-scale networks that constantly re-organize on multiple timescales, even when the brain is at rest. The timing of these dynamics is crucial for sensation, perception, cognition, and ultimately consciousness, but the underlying dynamics governin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Creaser, Peter Ashwin, Claire Postlethwaite, Juliane Britz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0
id doaj-54e87f1ee7c3429d9ceb804960b79a81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-54e87f1ee7c3429d9ceb804960b79a812021-01-10T12:55:41ZengSpringerOpenJournal of Mathematical Neuroscience2190-85672021-01-0111112510.1186/s13408-020-00100-0Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstatesJennifer Creaser0Peter Ashwin1Claire Postlethwaite2Juliane Britz3Department of Mathematics and EPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, University of ExeterDepartment of Mathematics and EPSRC Centre for Predictive Modelling in Healthcare, University of ExeterDepartment of Mathematics, University of AucklandDepartment of Psychology, University of FribourgAbstract The brain is intrinsically organized into large-scale networks that constantly re-organize on multiple timescales, even when the brain is at rest. The timing of these dynamics is crucial for sensation, perception, cognition, and ultimately consciousness, but the underlying dynamics governing the constant reorganization and switching between networks are not yet well understood. Electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates are brief periods of stable scalp topography that have been identified as the electrophysiological correlate of functional magnetic resonance imaging defined resting-state networks. Spatiotemporal microstate sequences maintain high temporal resolution and have been shown to be scale-free with long-range temporal correlations. Previous attempts to model EEG microstate sequences have failed to capture this crucial property and so cannot fully capture the dynamics; this paper answers the call for more sophisticated modeling approaches. We present a dynamical model that exhibits a noisy network attractor between nodes that represent the microstates. Using an excitable network between four nodes, we can reproduce the transition probabilities between microstates but not the heavy tailed residence time distributions. We present two extensions to this model: first, an additional hidden node at each state; second, an additional layer that controls the switching frequency in the original network. Introducing either extension to the network gives the flexibility to capture these heavy tails. We compare the model generated sequences to microstate sequences from EEG data collected from healthy subjects at rest. For the first extension, we show that the hidden nodes ‘trap’ the trajectories allowing the control of residence times at each node. For the second extension, we show that two nodes in the controlling layer are sufficient to model the long residence times. Finally, we show that in addition to capturing the residence time distributions and transition probabilities of the sequences, these two models capture additional properties of the sequences including having interspersed long and short residence times and long range temporal correlations in line with the data as measured by the Hurst exponent.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0EEG microstatesExcitable network modelResidence timesTransition processNoisy network attractorLong range temporal correlations
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer Creaser
Peter Ashwin
Claire Postlethwaite
Juliane Britz
spellingShingle Jennifer Creaser
Peter Ashwin
Claire Postlethwaite
Juliane Britz
Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
EEG microstates
Excitable network model
Residence times
Transition process
Noisy network attractor
Long range temporal correlations
author_facet Jennifer Creaser
Peter Ashwin
Claire Postlethwaite
Juliane Britz
author_sort Jennifer Creaser
title Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
title_short Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
title_full Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
title_fullStr Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
title_full_unstemmed Noisy network attractor models for transitions between EEG microstates
title_sort noisy network attractor models for transitions between eeg microstates
publisher SpringerOpen
series Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience
issn 2190-8567
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Abstract The brain is intrinsically organized into large-scale networks that constantly re-organize on multiple timescales, even when the brain is at rest. The timing of these dynamics is crucial for sensation, perception, cognition, and ultimately consciousness, but the underlying dynamics governing the constant reorganization and switching between networks are not yet well understood. Electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates are brief periods of stable scalp topography that have been identified as the electrophysiological correlate of functional magnetic resonance imaging defined resting-state networks. Spatiotemporal microstate sequences maintain high temporal resolution and have been shown to be scale-free with long-range temporal correlations. Previous attempts to model EEG microstate sequences have failed to capture this crucial property and so cannot fully capture the dynamics; this paper answers the call for more sophisticated modeling approaches. We present a dynamical model that exhibits a noisy network attractor between nodes that represent the microstates. Using an excitable network between four nodes, we can reproduce the transition probabilities between microstates but not the heavy tailed residence time distributions. We present two extensions to this model: first, an additional hidden node at each state; second, an additional layer that controls the switching frequency in the original network. Introducing either extension to the network gives the flexibility to capture these heavy tails. We compare the model generated sequences to microstate sequences from EEG data collected from healthy subjects at rest. For the first extension, we show that the hidden nodes ‘trap’ the trajectories allowing the control of residence times at each node. For the second extension, we show that two nodes in the controlling layer are sufficient to model the long residence times. Finally, we show that in addition to capturing the residence time distributions and transition probabilities of the sequences, these two models capture additional properties of the sequences including having interspersed long and short residence times and long range temporal correlations in line with the data as measured by the Hurst exponent.
topic EEG microstates
Excitable network model
Residence times
Transition process
Noisy network attractor
Long range temporal correlations
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-020-00100-0
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifercreaser noisynetworkattractormodelsfortransitionsbetweeneegmicrostates
AT peterashwin noisynetworkattractormodelsfortransitionsbetweeneegmicrostates
AT clairepostlethwaite noisynetworkattractormodelsfortransitionsbetweeneegmicrostates
AT julianebritz noisynetworkattractormodelsfortransitionsbetweeneegmicrostates
_version_ 1724342088402731008