ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS

Introduction: Anthropometric measurements are widely used because they are simple, non-invasive and with fast results. Weight and height can be obtained by measurement or by estimation formulas. Few studies have been evaluated the similarity of the values obtained through the formulas of estimation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Raíssa Marina de Freitas Rodrigues, Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo, Margarete Nimer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Josely Correa Koury 2019-08-01
Series:Demetra
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/35793
id doaj-55011fe6d377405299aa074f1f489d2a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-55011fe6d377405299aa074f1f489d2a2021-04-02T21:06:39ZengJosely Correa KouryDemetra2238-913X2019-08-01140e35793e3579310.12957/demetra.2019.3579323685ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENSRaíssa Marina de Freitas RodriguesVirgínia Capistrano FajardoMargarete NimerIntroduction: Anthropometric measurements are widely used because they are simple, non-invasive and with fast results. Weight and height can be obtained by measurement or by estimation formulas. Few studies have been evaluated the similarity of the values obtained through the formulas of estimation with the values measured. Aim: Compare the weight and height measured with the resultant values by estimation formulas, in order to analyze which of them presents better results in brazilian adults. Method: This is a cross-sectional study carried out with 100 students between 19 and 35 years of age. The correlation and the concordance between weight and height measured and the estimated values were analyzed. Results: The weight estimation formulas of Chumlea et al. and formula C of Rabito et al. presented a very strong correlation, only Chumlea et al. had good agreement and homogeneity. Formulas A and B of Rabito et al. presented strong correlation, good agreement and heterogeneity. The height estimation formulas of Chumlea et al. and Rabito et al. obtained a strong correlation with the measured height and heterogeneity, being that of Rabito et al. presented good agreement. Conclusion: There was good correlation between all the formulas and the measures evaluated. However, only the height estimation formula of Rabito et al., those of weight estimation by Chumlea et al. and Formulas A and B of Rabito et al. presented good agreement. DOI: 10.12957/demetra.2019.35793https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/35793antropometria. peso corporal. estatura.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Raíssa Marina de Freitas Rodrigues
Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo
Margarete Nimer
spellingShingle Raíssa Marina de Freitas Rodrigues
Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo
Margarete Nimer
ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
Demetra
antropometria. peso corporal. estatura.
author_facet Raíssa Marina de Freitas Rodrigues
Virgínia Capistrano Fajardo
Margarete Nimer
author_sort Raíssa Marina de Freitas Rodrigues
title ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
title_short ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
title_full ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
title_fullStr ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
title_full_unstemmed ANÁLISE DE FÓRMULAS DE ESTIMATIVA DE PESO E ALTURA EM ADULTOS JOVENS
title_sort análise de fórmulas de estimativa de peso e altura em adultos jovens
publisher Josely Correa Koury
series Demetra
issn 2238-913X
publishDate 2019-08-01
description Introduction: Anthropometric measurements are widely used because they are simple, non-invasive and with fast results. Weight and height can be obtained by measurement or by estimation formulas. Few studies have been evaluated the similarity of the values obtained through the formulas of estimation with the values measured. Aim: Compare the weight and height measured with the resultant values by estimation formulas, in order to analyze which of them presents better results in brazilian adults. Method: This is a cross-sectional study carried out with 100 students between 19 and 35 years of age. The correlation and the concordance between weight and height measured and the estimated values were analyzed. Results: The weight estimation formulas of Chumlea et al. and formula C of Rabito et al. presented a very strong correlation, only Chumlea et al. had good agreement and homogeneity. Formulas A and B of Rabito et al. presented strong correlation, good agreement and heterogeneity. The height estimation formulas of Chumlea et al. and Rabito et al. obtained a strong correlation with the measured height and heterogeneity, being that of Rabito et al. presented good agreement. Conclusion: There was good correlation between all the formulas and the measures evaluated. However, only the height estimation formula of Rabito et al., those of weight estimation by Chumlea et al. and Formulas A and B of Rabito et al. presented good agreement. DOI: 10.12957/demetra.2019.35793
topic antropometria. peso corporal. estatura.
url https://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/demetra/article/view/35793
work_keys_str_mv AT raissamarinadefreitasrodrigues analisedeformulasdeestimativadepesoealturaemadultosjovens
AT virginiacapistranofajardo analisedeformulasdeestimativadepesoealturaemadultosjovens
AT margaretenimer analisedeformulasdeestimativadepesoealturaemadultosjovens
_version_ 1721545610197204992