Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017

Background: Obesity rates are higher among rural versus urban adolescents. To examine possible mechanisms for the rural-urban adolescent obesity disparity, we examined the direct and indirect effects of food purchasing patterns, and the home, school, and consumer food environments on dietary intake...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alison Gustafson, Stephanie Jilcott Pitts, Jordan McDonald, Hannah Ford, Paige Connelly, Rachel Gillespie, Emily Liu, Heather Bush, Candace Brancato, Toyin Babatande, Janet Mullins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-10-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1255
id doaj-5507e919fab04cf0a21dc27cc01f5447
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alison Gustafson
Stephanie Jilcott Pitts
Jordan McDonald
Hannah Ford
Paige Connelly
Rachel Gillespie
Emily Liu
Heather Bush
Candace Brancato
Toyin Babatande
Janet Mullins
spellingShingle Alison Gustafson
Stephanie Jilcott Pitts
Jordan McDonald
Hannah Ford
Paige Connelly
Rachel Gillespie
Emily Liu
Heather Bush
Candace Brancato
Toyin Babatande
Janet Mullins
Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
consumer food environment
school food environment
home food availability
adolescent obesity
nutrition
author_facet Alison Gustafson
Stephanie Jilcott Pitts
Jordan McDonald
Hannah Ford
Paige Connelly
Rachel Gillespie
Emily Liu
Heather Bush
Candace Brancato
Toyin Babatande
Janet Mullins
author_sort Alison Gustafson
title Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
title_short Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
title_full Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
title_fullStr Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
title_full_unstemmed Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017
title_sort direct effects of the home, school, and consumer food environments on the association between food purchasing patterns and dietary intake among rural adolescents in kentucky and north carolina, 2017
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Background: Obesity rates are higher among rural versus urban adolescents. To examine possible mechanisms for the rural-urban adolescent obesity disparity, we examined the direct and indirect effects of food purchasing patterns, and the home, school, and consumer food environments on dietary intake among rural adolescents. Methods: A baseline survey was conducted among adolescents in eight rural high schools (four in Eastern Kentucky, and four in Eastern North Carolina). Participants answered questions about food purchasing patterns, dietary intake, home food availability, and demographics. The school and consumer food environments were assessed using validated measures from the School Meals Cost Study (United States Department of Agriculture-Mathematica) and the Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey for Stores, Restaurants, and Corner Stores. Results: Of 432 adolescents, 55% were normal weight, 24% were overweight, and 21% were obese. There was a direct association between unhealthy food purchasing patterns (shopping frequently at gas stations, fast food, and dollar stores) and consuming more added sugars, when compared to those with a healthy shopping pattern (shopping less frequently at gas stations, fast food, and dollar stores) [Odds Ratio = 2.41 (95% CI (confidence interval) 0.99, 3.82)]. Those who reported always having fruits and vegetables in the home consumed more servings of fruits and vegetables [OR = 0.31 cups (95% CI 0.22, 0.44)] compared to those who reported never having fruits and vegetables in the home. Adolescents attending a school with a low healthy food availability score consumed fewer servings of fruits and vegetables [−0.001 (95% CI −0.001, 0.0001)] compared to those attending a school with a high healthy food availability score. Conclusions: There are direct associations between food purchasing patterns, the home and school food environments, and dietary intake among rural adolescents. These cross-sectional results informed the development of the “Go Big and Bring it Home” program, a text messaging intervention to improve adolescents’ fruit, vegetable, and healthy beverage intake.
topic consumer food environment
school food environment
home food availability
adolescent obesity
nutrition
url https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1255
work_keys_str_mv AT alisongustafson directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT stephaniejilcottpitts directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT jordanmcdonald directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT hannahford directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT paigeconnelly directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT rachelgillespie directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT emilyliu directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT heatherbush directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT candacebrancato directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT toyinbabatande directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
AT janetmullins directeffectsofthehomeschoolandconsumerfoodenvironmentsontheassociationbetweenfoodpurchasingpatternsanddietaryintakeamongruraladolescentsinkentuckyandnorthcarolina2017
_version_ 1725411016601239552
spelling doaj-5507e919fab04cf0a21dc27cc01f54472020-11-25T00:09:36ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012017-10-011410125510.3390/ijerph14101255ijerph14101255Direct Effects of the Home, School, and Consumer Food Environments on the Association between Food Purchasing Patterns and Dietary Intake among Rural Adolescents in Kentucky and North Carolina, 2017Alison Gustafson0Stephanie Jilcott Pitts1Jordan McDonald2Hannah Ford3Paige Connelly4Rachel Gillespie5Emily Liu6Heather Bush7Candace Brancato8Toyin Babatande9Janet Mullins10Department of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USADepartment of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine, ECU 600 Moye Blvd., Mailstop 660, Lakeside Annex Modular Unit 8 Room 126, Greenville, NC 27834, USADepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USADepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USADepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USADepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USADepartment of Nutrition, University of Pennsylvania, College Station, PA 20067, USACollege of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 725 Rose Street Room 301, Lexington, KY 40536, USACollege of Public Health, University of Kentucky, 725 Rose Street Room 301, Lexington, KY 40536, USAHealth Sciences Bldg, 3310J MailStop #668, College of Allied Health Sciences, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USADepartment of Dietetics and Human Nutrition, 206J Funkhouser Building, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USABackground: Obesity rates are higher among rural versus urban adolescents. To examine possible mechanisms for the rural-urban adolescent obesity disparity, we examined the direct and indirect effects of food purchasing patterns, and the home, school, and consumer food environments on dietary intake among rural adolescents. Methods: A baseline survey was conducted among adolescents in eight rural high schools (four in Eastern Kentucky, and four in Eastern North Carolina). Participants answered questions about food purchasing patterns, dietary intake, home food availability, and demographics. The school and consumer food environments were assessed using validated measures from the School Meals Cost Study (United States Department of Agriculture-Mathematica) and the Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey for Stores, Restaurants, and Corner Stores. Results: Of 432 adolescents, 55% were normal weight, 24% were overweight, and 21% were obese. There was a direct association between unhealthy food purchasing patterns (shopping frequently at gas stations, fast food, and dollar stores) and consuming more added sugars, when compared to those with a healthy shopping pattern (shopping less frequently at gas stations, fast food, and dollar stores) [Odds Ratio = 2.41 (95% CI (confidence interval) 0.99, 3.82)]. Those who reported always having fruits and vegetables in the home consumed more servings of fruits and vegetables [OR = 0.31 cups (95% CI 0.22, 0.44)] compared to those who reported never having fruits and vegetables in the home. Adolescents attending a school with a low healthy food availability score consumed fewer servings of fruits and vegetables [−0.001 (95% CI −0.001, 0.0001)] compared to those attending a school with a high healthy food availability score. Conclusions: There are direct associations between food purchasing patterns, the home and school food environments, and dietary intake among rural adolescents. These cross-sectional results informed the development of the “Go Big and Bring it Home” program, a text messaging intervention to improve adolescents’ fruit, vegetable, and healthy beverage intake.https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1255consumer food environmentschool food environmenthome food availabilityadolescent obesitynutrition